Primary Legal Sources

Why This Matters

Primary legal sources are the raw materials of legal argument—they're what courts actually apply when deciding cases, and they're what you'll cite to support every legal position you take. In Advanced Legal Research, you're being tested on your ability to identify which primary source controls a given situation, understand how these sources interact hierarchically, and locate them efficiently across multiple research platforms. The interplay between constitutional provisions, statutory law, case law, and administrative regulations forms the foundation of legal analysis.

Don't just memorize what each source is—know where it fits in the hierarchy of authority, how it's created, and when one source trumps another. Understanding the relationships between these sources will help you tackle complex research problems where multiple authorities intersect. Whether you're parsing a federal preemption question or tracing how an agency regulation implements a statute, your grasp of primary source structure determines your research effectiveness.

---

Constitutional and Treaty-Based Authority

These sources occupy the highest rungs of the legal hierarchy. Constitutional supremacy means that any law conflicting with constitutional provisions is invalid, while treaties create binding federal obligations that can reshape domestic law.

Constitutions (Federal and State)

• Supreme law of the land—the U.S. Constitution establishes governmental structure and fundamental rights that override all conflicting laws
• Federal vs. state scope: federal Constitution binds all jurisdictions, while state constitutions may grant broader rights than federal protections (state constitutional claims often provide alternative grounds for relief)
• Amendment processes reflect evolving legal standards; know that constitutional interpretation through case law often matters more than the text alone for research purposes

Treaties

• Ratification requires two-thirds Senate approval—this distinguishes treaties from executive agreements, which don't require Senate consent
• Self-executing vs. non-self-executing: some treaties apply directly as domestic law, while others require implementing legislation before courts can enforce them
• Equal footing with federal statutes under the Supremacy Clause; when conflicts arise, the later-in-time rule generally applies

---

Legislative Sources

Legislatures create law through formal enactment processes. Statutory authority derives from the legislative branch's constitutional power to make law, and understanding how statutes are organized and interpreted is essential for efficient research.

Statutes and Codes

• Statutes are session laws—individual acts passed by Congress or state legislatures, cited by public law number or chapter
• Codes organize statutes by subject matter (e.g., Title 18 for federal criminal law, Title 26 for tax); always cite to the codified version unless the session law contains provisions not yet codified
• Statutory interpretation requires examining text, structure, and legislative history; courts apply canons of construction when meaning is ambiguous

Legislative History Materials

• Committee reports are the gold standard—courts give them significant weight when interpreting ambiguous statutory language
• Includes floor debates, hearing transcripts, and amendment histories; useful for establishing legislative intent behind specific provisions
• Hierarchy of persuasiveness: committee reports > sponsor statements > floor debates > hearing testimony; know which materials courts in your jurisdiction actually credit

Local Ordinances

• Municipal and county laws addressing zoning, licensing, public safety, and local governance issues
• Must comply with state enabling statutes—local governments have only those powers delegated by the state (Dillon's Rule vs. home rule jurisdictions)
• Research challenges: often poorly indexed and scattered across municipal codes; check both codified ordinances and recent session laws

---

Judicial Authority

Courts interpret and apply law through written opinions that become binding or persuasive authority. Stare decisis—the doctrine of following precedent—makes case law essential for predicting how courts will rule on similar issues.

Case Law (Court Opinions)

• Judicial decisions interpreting constitutions, statutes, and regulations—the holding (not dicta) creates binding precedent within that court's jurisdiction
• Hierarchical authority: U.S. Supreme Court binds all courts on federal issues; mandatory vs. persuasive precedent depends on court level and jurisdiction
• Case law evolves through distinguishing, limiting, or overruling prior decisions; always check that your cases remain good law through citator services

Court Rules

• Procedural requirements governing filing deadlines, document formatting, motion practice, and appellate procedures
• Jurisdiction-specific: federal rules (FRCP, FRAP, FRE) differ from state rules; local rules add court-specific requirements that can be outcome-determinative
• Failure to comply can result in sanctions, dismissal, or waiver of arguments; treat rules research as seriously as substantive law research

---

Executive and Administrative Sources

The executive branch implements and enforces law through regulations, orders, and adjudicatory decisions. Administrative law governs how agencies exercise delegated authority and how their actions can be challenged.

Administrative Regulations

• Agency-created rules implementing statutes—published in the Federal Register and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
• Force of law when properly promulgated under enabling statutes; courts apply Chevron or Skidmore deference frameworks when reviewing agency interpretations
• Notice-and-comment rulemaking under the APA requires public participation; failure to follow proper procedures can invalidate regulations

Agency Decisions and Orders

• Adjudicatory determinations in specific cases involving regulatory compliance, benefits, or enforcement actions
• Precedential value varies: some agencies designate decisions as precedential, while others treat them as binding only on the parties (check agency practice)
• Exhaustion requirements often mandate pursuing administrative remedies before seeking judicial review

Executive Orders

• Presidential directives managing executive branch operations and policy implementation
• No legislative approval required, but authority must derive from constitutional powers or statutory delegation
• Subject to judicial review—courts can invalidate orders exceeding constitutional or statutory authority (Youngstown framework for analyzing presidential power)

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. A federal statute conflicts with a treaty signed the same year—what rule determines which controls, and where would you research the timeline?

2. Which two primary sources both derive authority from legislative delegation but differ in whether they're generally applicable or case-specific? How does this distinction affect their precedential value?

3. Compare and contrast the research process for finding federal administrative regulations versus state administrative regulations—what databases and organizational structures differ?

4. If an FRQ asks you to identify all primary sources relevant to challenging a city's new zoning restriction, which sources might apply and in what hierarchical order?

5. A court rule requires motions to be filed within 14 days, but a case from that court suggests the deadline is jurisdictional rather than procedural—which source controls, and how would you reconcile them in your research?