Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Your closing statement is the last thing your audience hears—and often the only thing they remember. In Advanced Public Speaking, you're being tested on your ability to craft conclusions that don't just end a speech but transform it. The techniques you choose reveal your understanding of audience psychology, rhetorical strategy, and speech structure. Evaluators look for closings that demonstrate purposeful design, not just a signal that you're done talking.
These ten closing techniques fall into distinct categories based on their rhetorical function: cognitive reinforcement, emotional resonance, audience activation, and structural elegance. Don't just memorize what each technique is—know when to deploy it, why it works psychologically, and how to combine techniques for maximum impact. The best speakers layer multiple closing strategies, and that's exactly what exam prompts will ask you to analyze and execute.
These closings work by strengthening message retention through repetition and clarity. They appeal to the logical mind and ensure your audience walks away with your core ideas intact.
Compare: Thesis Restatement vs. Summary of Key Points—both reinforce content, but restatement focuses on one core idea while summary covers multiple arguments. Use restatement for persuasive speeches with a single call to action; use summary for informative speeches with distinct sections.
These closings work by creating psychological connection through feeling rather than logic. They tap into shared human experiences and values to make your message personally meaningful.
Compare: Emotional Appeal vs. Visualization—both target feelings, but emotional appeal works in the present moment while visualization projects emotion into the future. If an exam asks about motivating long-term behavior change, visualization is your strongest technique.
These closings work by transferring responsibility from speaker to listener. They position the audience as agents of change rather than passive recipients of information.
Compare: Call to Action vs. Challenge—both prompt behavior, but CTAs specify exactly what to do while challenges specify who to become. CTAs work for concrete, immediate goals; challenges work for long-term mindset shifts. FRQ tip: If asked to close a civic engagement speech, layer both—challenge their identity, then give a specific CTA.
This closing works by satisfying the audience's psychological need for completion. It creates aesthetic pleasure through deliberate design.
Compare: Circular Ending vs. Summary—both create closure, but circular endings provide emotional satisfaction through narrative completion while summaries provide intellectual satisfaction through content review. Circular endings feel more sophisticated and are often rewarded in speech evaluations.
| Rhetorical Function | Best Techniques | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Message Retention | Thesis Restatement, Summary, Powerful Statistic | Informative speeches, complex arguments |
| Emotional Connection | Emotional Appeal, Quote/Anecdote, Visualization | Inspirational, commemorative speeches |
| Behavior Change | Call to Action, Challenge | Persuasive speeches, advocacy |
| Structural Satisfaction | Circular Ending | Narrative-driven speeches, TED-style talks |
| Audience Engagement | Rhetorical Question, Challenge | Interactive contexts, smaller audiences |
| Credibility Boost | Powerful Statistic, Memorable Quote | Policy speeches, academic presentations |
| Urgency Creation | Visualization, Powerful Statistic, CTA | Fundraising, activism, crisis communication |
| Identity Appeal | Challenge, Emotional Appeal | Graduation speeches, motivational contexts |
Which two closing techniques both aim to change audience behavior, and how do they differ in approach?
You're ending a speech about climate action that opened with a story about your grandmother's farm. Which closing technique creates the most structural elegance, and what would you add to it for maximum impact?
Compare and contrast Emotional Appeal and Visualization—when would you choose one over the other, and how might you combine them?
A classmate ends their persuasive speech with "So, think about it." What's wrong with this rhetorical question, and how would you coach them to improve it?
If an FRQ asks you to write a closing that achieves both cognitive reinforcement and audience activation, which two techniques would you layer together and in what order?