Power series are the backbone of complex analysis—they transform complicated functions into infinite sums that you can manipulate, differentiate, and integrate term by term. You're being tested on your ability to recognize when a function can be represented as a power series, where that representation is valid (convergence), and how to use these expansions to analyze function behavior near specific points. These concepts connect directly to analyticity, residue calculations, and contour integration.
Don't just memorize the formulas for each series. Know why Taylor series center matters, how radius of convergence limits your analysis, and what distinguishes entire functions from those with singularities. When an exam asks you to expand a function or evaluate a limit, you need to recognize which series representation applies and where it's valid—that's the real skill being tested.
Foundational Series Structures
The Taylor and Maclaurin series provide the fundamental framework for representing analytic functions as power series. Any function that's analytic at a point can be expressed as a convergent power series in some neighborhood of that point.
Taylor Series
Represents any analytic function as an infinite sum centered at point a, with the general form f(z)=∑n=0∞n!f(n)(a)(z−a)n
Coefficients encode all derivative information—the nth coefficient is n!f(n)(a), connecting local behavior to global representation
Convergence occurs within a disk centered at a, extending to the nearest singularity in the complex plane
Maclaurin Series
Special case of Taylor series with a=0—simplifies to f(z)=∑n=0∞n!f(n)(0)zn
Default choice for functions analytic at the origin—most standard series you'll memorize are Maclaurin series
Computational efficiency comes from evaluating derivatives at zero, which often produces clean patterns
Compare: Taylor vs. Maclaurin—both represent analytic functions as power series, but Maclaurin is centered at zero while Taylor allows any center point a. If an FRQ asks you to expand around a non-zero point, you need the full Taylor formula.
Building Block Series
These fundamental series serve as templates for deriving more complex expansions. Master these forms and you can construct most series you'll encounter through substitution and manipulation.
Geometric Series
Converges to 1−ra when ∣r∣<1—the series ∑n=0∞arn is the prototype for understanding convergence
Foundation for rational function expansions—rewrite expressions as 1−(something)1 to generate series
Radius of convergence is exactly 1 for the standard form, determined by the singularity at r=1
Binomial Series
Generalizes (1+z)k to non-integer exponents—given by ∑n=0∞(nk)zn where (nk)=n!k(k−1)⋯(k−n+1)
Converges for ∣z∣<1 when k is not a non-negative integer; terminates for non-negative integer k
Essential for fractional powers and roots—expanding 1+z or (1+z)−1 requires this series
Compare: Geometric vs. Binomial—geometric series is actually the binomial series with k=−1. Recognizing this connection helps you derive one from the other and understand why both have radius of convergence 1.
Entire Function Series
These series converge everywhere in the complex plane, representing entire functions—functions analytic on all of C with no singularities.
Exponential Function Series
Converges for all z∈C—the series ez=∑n=0∞n!zn has infinite radius of convergence
Factorial growth in denominators ensures convergence regardless of how large ∣z∣ becomes
Connects to Euler's formulaeiz=cosz+isinz, linking exponential and trigonometric series
Sine and Cosine Series
Sine uses only odd powers—sinz=∑n=0∞(2n+1)!(−1)nz2n+1 reflects the odd symmetry of sine
Cosine uses only even powers—cosz=∑n=0∞(2n)!(−1)nz2n reflects the even symmetry of cosine
Both converge for all z and can be derived from the exponential series using eiz
Compare: Exponential vs. Trigonometric series—all three are entire functions with infinite radius of convergence, but ez uses all powers while sine and cosine split into odd and even terms. This decomposition appears directly in Euler's formula.
Series with Finite Convergence
These series have restricted domains of convergence, typically due to singularities that limit how far the power series can extend.
Logarithmic Series
Converges only for ∣z∣<1—the series ln(1+z)=∑n=1∞n(−1)n−1zn is limited by the branch point at z=−1
Starts at n=1, not n=0—there's no constant term since ln(1)=0
Slower convergence than factorial-based series due to the n1 coefficients rather than n!1
Radius of Convergence
Measures the disk where the series converges absolutely—for ∑an(z−a)n, convergence holds when ∣z−a∣<R
Calculated via ratio testR=limn→∞an+1an or root test R=limsupn→∞∣an∣1/n1
Determined by nearest singularity in the complex plane—the series cannot converge past any point where f(z) fails to be analytic
Compare: Logarithmic vs. Exponential series—both are fundamental transcendental functions, but ez is entire (infinite radius) while ln(1+z) has radius 1 due to the branch point. This illustrates how singularities control convergence.
Advanced Convergence Theory
These results govern the behavior of power series at boundary points and extend representations to functions with singularities.
Abel's Theorem
Extends convergence to boundary points—if ∑an converges, then limx→1−∑anxn=∑an
Guarantees continuity at convergent boundary points—the function defined by the series is continuous from within the disk
Critical for summing conditionally convergent series like ln2=1−21+31−⋯
Laurent Series
Includes negative powers of (z−a)—the general form f(z)=∑n=−∞∞an(z−a)n handles singularities
Converges in an annulusr<∣z−a∣<R, not a disk—the inner radius excludes the singularity
Essential for residue calculation—the coefficient a−1 is the residue at z=a, fundamental to contour integration
Compare: Taylor vs. Laurent series—Taylor handles analytic functions with only non-negative powers, while Laurent accommodates isolated singularities using negative powers. When an FRQ involves singularities or residues, Laurent series is your tool.
Quick Reference Table
Concept
Best Examples
Entire functions (infinite radius)
Exponential, Sine, Cosine
Finite radius of convergence
Geometric, Logarithmic, Binomial
Series centered at arbitrary point
Taylor series
Series centered at origin
Maclaurin series
Handling singularities
Laurent series
Boundary behavior
Abel's theorem
Convergence testing
Radius of convergence (ratio/root test)
Non-integer exponents
Binomial series
Self-Check Questions
Which two series are entire functions that can be combined to derive the third via Euler's formula? What is that relationship?
A function has a simple pole at z=2. If you expand it in a Taylor series centered at z=0, what is the maximum possible radius of convergence, and why?
Compare and contrast the logarithmic series and the geometric series: what limits the convergence of each, and how do their coefficient patterns differ?
You need to expand f(z)=(z−1)(z−3)1 around z=0. Which fundamental series form would you use, and what's the radius of convergence?
When would you choose a Laurent series over a Taylor series? Give a specific scenario involving residue calculation where this choice is necessary.
Power Series Representations to Know for Intro to Complex Analysis