Political Scandals

Why This Matters

Political scandals aren't just juicy historical drama—they're windows into how journalism functions as a check on power. When you study these events, you're really examining press-government relationships, media ethics, investigative techniques, and the consequences of disclosure. Every scandal on this list became a scandal because someone reported it, and understanding how that reporting unfolded reveals the mechanics of political journalism in action.

You're being tested on more than names and dates. Examiners want to see that you understand why certain stories break when they do, how different media eras shaped coverage, and what ethical tensions journalists face when covering powerful figures. Don't just memorize what happened—know what each scandal teaches us about the press's role in democracy and the evolving standards of political accountability.

---

Investigative Journalism and Government Transparency

These scandals demonstrate how sustained investigative reporting can expose hidden government actions. The key mechanism here is the tension between official secrecy and the press's watchdog function—when journalists gain access to suppressed information, they force public reckonings with institutional misconduct.

Watergate Scandal

• Investigative reporting by Woodward and Bernstein at The Washington Post transformed a "third-rate burglary" into a constitutional crisis through persistent source cultivation and document verification
• Deep Throat (Mark Felt) demonstrated the critical role of confidential sources in holding power accountable—a foundational concept in journalism ethics
• Press freedom implications emerged when Nixon's attempts to suppress coverage failed, reinforcing the media's independence from executive pressure

Pentagon Papers

• Daniel Ellsberg's leak of classified documents to The New York Times tested whether the government could use "prior restraint" to stop publication
• New York Times Co. v. United States (1971) established that the press could publish classified material when public interest outweighed national security claims—a landmark First Amendment ruling
• Credibility gap became a defining term as the documents revealed systematic government deception about Vietnam War progress

Russian Interference in 2016 U.S. Election

• Multi-platform disinformation through social media required journalists to develop new verification methods for identifying foreign influence operations
• Mueller investigation coverage tested media outlets' ability to report on ongoing legal proceedings without speculation or partisan framing
• Source attribution challenges emerged as reporters navigated intelligence community leaks while maintaining credibility

---

Executive Power and Congressional Oversight

These scandals center on the constitutional balance between branches of government. The underlying principle is separation of powers—when executives act unilaterally or deceive Congress, scandals often follow, and the press becomes the mechanism through which these violations reach public awareness.

Iran-Contra Affair

• Secret arms sales to Iran to fund Nicaraguan Contra rebels violated the Boland Amendment, raising questions about executive authority to conduct foreign policy outside congressional oversight
• Oliver North's testimony became a media spectacle that complicated public understanding—he appeared both as lawbreaker and patriot depending on coverage framing
• Pardons by George H.W. Bush later undermined accountability, illustrating how scandal narratives can remain unresolved

Teapot Dome Scandal

• Secretary Albert Fall's bribery conviction marked the first time a Cabinet member went to prison, establishing precedent for prosecuting high-level corruption
• Senate investigation demonstrated congressional oversight power before modern investigative journalism fully developed
• Muckraking press coverage connected the scandal to broader Progressive Era concerns about corporate influence on government

---

Personal Conduct and Media Ethics

These scandals force journalists to navigate the boundary between public accountability and private life. The central tension is newsworthiness versus privacy—when does personal behavior become legitimate political news, and how should media handle stories that mix policy concerns with tabloid appeal?

Clinton-Lewinsky Scandal

• Independent counsel Kenneth Starr's investigation expanded from Whitewater into personal conduct, raising questions about prosecutorial scope and media complicity in publicizing salacious details
• 24-hour cable news cycle transformed coverage, with networks competing for updates and blurring lines between news and entertainment
• Impeachment proceedings tested whether personal misconduct constituted "high crimes and misdemeanors"—a debate the press framed but couldn't resolve

Profumo Affair

• National security angle gave journalists justification for covering a sex scandal—Christine Keeler's simultaneous relationship with a Soviet attaché made personal conduct politically relevant
• British press restraint initially contrasted with later aggressive coverage, illustrating how media norms around political privacy have shifted over time
• Resignation without prosecution showed that political consequences can exceed legal ones when public trust collapses

Whitewater Controversy

• Special prosecutor investigations lasted years without producing charges against the Clintons, raising questions about whether sustained coverage was proportionate to evidence
• "Scandal fatigue" emerged as a media phenomenon—prolonged coverage without resolution can diminish public attention rather than increase accountability
• Foundation for later scrutiny established patterns of Clinton coverage that persisted through subsequent campaigns

---

Systemic Corruption and Reform

These scandals reveal patterns of institutional corruption rather than individual misconduct. The mechanism is structural—when political systems incentivize corrupt behavior, scandals expose not just bad actors but flawed institutions requiring reform.

Tammany Hall Corruption

• Thomas Nast's political cartoons in Harper's Weekly demonstrated visual journalism's power to reach audiences beyond literate elites—Boss Tweed reportedly said, "Stop them damn pictures"
• Machine politics model showed how corruption could coexist with genuine constituent services, complicating simple reform narratives
• Progressive Era reforms including civil service requirements and primary elections emerged partly in response to machine politics exposure

Abscam

• FBI sting operations using hidden cameras produced dramatic footage that became central to media coverage, raising questions about entrapment and journalistic ethics in using government-produced evidence
• Six congressional convictions demonstrated vulnerability of elected officials to corruption, prompting ethics reforms
• Undercover journalism parallels emerged as reporters debated whether similar deceptive techniques were acceptable for journalists pursuing stories

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Both Watergate and the Pentagon Papers involved confidential sources providing information to journalists. What ethical obligations do these cases suggest reporters have toward sources, and how did the outcomes differ for the sources themselves?

2. Compare how the media technology of the era shaped coverage of Tammany Hall (1870s print/cartoons) versus Clinton-Lewinsky (1990s cable news). How did each medium's characteristics influence public understanding?

3. Iran-Contra and Teapot Dome both involved executive branch officials acting outside legal authority. Why did Teapot Dome produce clearer public accountability while Iran-Contra's narrative remained more contested?

4. If an FRQ asked you to evaluate when personal conduct becomes legitimate political news, which two scandals would you compare, and what criteria would you use to distinguish them?

5. The Pentagon Papers and Russian Interference cases both involved national security concerns and questions about what information the public should access. How do these cases illustrate evolving challenges in political journalism across a 45-year span?