Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Latin American wars from 1791 to the present aren't just a timeline of battles—they're windows into the forces that shaped the modern Western Hemisphere. You're being tested on how colonialism, nationalism, resource competition, and ideological conflict drove these wars and transformed societies. Each conflict reveals something about power dynamics: who held it, who challenged it, and what happened when empires crumbled or new nations clashed over borders and beliefs.
Don't fall into the trap of memorizing dates and death tolls. Instead, focus on why each war started, what changed because of it, and how it connects to broader themes like decolonization, U.S. intervention, social revolution, and territorial nationalism. When you understand the underlying mechanisms, you can tackle any FRQ that asks you to compare conflicts or analyze their long-term consequences.
These conflicts challenged European colonial rule and established new nations built on ideals of freedom—though the meaning of "freedom" varied dramatically depending on who was fighting.
Compare: Haitian Revolution vs. Latin American Wars of Independence—both overthrew colonial rule, but Haiti's revolution was driven by enslaved people demanding total liberation, while mainland independence movements were led by creole elites who often maintained racial hierarchies. If an FRQ asks about the limits of independence movements, this contrast is essential.
Once independence was achieved, Latin American nations turned on each other—and faced external powers—in brutal struggles over land, resources, and regional dominance.
Compare: War of the Triple Alliance vs. War of the Pacific—both reshaped South American borders through devastating conflict, but the Triple Alliance war was driven by political rivalries and nationalism, while the Pacific war was fundamentally about economic resources (nitrates). The Pacific war's consequences remain diplomatically active today.
These conflicts went beyond changing governments—they aimed to restructure society itself, challenging who held power and how wealth was distributed.
Compare: Mexican Revolution vs. Cuban Revolution—both targeted dictatorships and demanded land reform, but Mexico's revolution produced a constitutional republic with mixed economic policies, while Cuba's created a socialist state aligned with the Soviet Union. The Mexican Revolution predated Cold War ideological frameworks; Cuba's was defined by them.
Some conflicts were driven less by ideology than by the promise of valuable resources—real or imagined—beneath disputed territories.
Compare: Chaco War vs. Falklands War—both involved nationalist claims to disputed territory, but the Chaco War was fought between neighboring Latin American nations over resources, while the Falklands pitted a Latin American nation against a European colonial power. Both wars had unintended political consequences: Paraguay's victory didn't bring prosperity, and Argentina's defeat ended military rule.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Anti-colonial liberation | Haitian Revolution, Latin American Wars of Independence, Cuban War of Independence |
| Territorial expansion/loss | Mexican-American War, War of the Pacific, Falklands War |
| Regional power struggles | War of the Triple Alliance, War of the Pacific, Chaco War |
| Social revolution | Mexican Revolution, Cuban Revolution |
| Resource-driven conflict | War of the Pacific (nitrates), Chaco War (oil) |
| U.S. intervention/influence | Mexican-American War, Cuban War of Independence, Cuban Revolution |
| Cold War ideological conflict | Cuban Revolution |
| Military government collapse | Falklands War |
Which two conflicts were fundamentally driven by competition over natural resources, and how did the outcomes differ in terms of whether the "winners" actually benefited economically?
Compare the Haitian Revolution and the Latin American Wars of Independence: What social groups led each movement, and how did this affect post-independence social structures?
If an FRQ asked you to analyze how war can lead to political change within a country (not just between countries), which two conflicts would provide the strongest contrasting examples?
Both the Mexican Revolution and Cuban Revolution targeted dictatorships and pursued land reform. What fundamental difference in their outcomes reflects the different historical moments in which they occurred?
Which conflicts created territorial disputes that remain unresolved today, and what does their persistence reveal about the relationship between nationalism and foreign policy in Latin America?