Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Africa's wars of independence weren't just military conflicts—they were laboratories for anti-colonial strategy that reshaped global politics. You're being tested on how these struggles reveal the mechanisms of decolonization: settler colonialism versus extraction colonialism, Cold War proxy dynamics, guerrilla mobilization tactics, and the unfinished business of post-independence state-building. Understanding why some conflicts lasted decades while others concluded relatively quickly tells you everything about colonial investment, metropolitan politics, and international pressure.
Don't just memorize dates and acronyms. Know what each conflict illustrates about broader patterns: Why did Portuguese colonies fight longer? How did Cold War alignments shape outcomes? What made settler colonies particularly violent? These conceptual threads connect individual wars to the larger story of African self-determination—and they're exactly what FRQ prompts will ask you to analyze.
Where European populations established permanent settlements and claimed land as their own, independence required not just political transfer but fundamental restructuring of society. Settler colonies produced the most protracted and violent conflicts because colonizers had no "home" to return to.
Compare: Algeria vs. Rhodesia—both settler colonies requiring armed struggle, but Algeria's integration into France made it a metropolitan crisis while Rhodesia's UDI made it an international pariah. If an FRQ asks about settler colonialism's impact on decolonization, these are your strongest contrasts.
Portugal, Europe's poorest colonial power, refused decolonization longer than any other—until the wars bankrupted the state and triggered revolution at home. The simultaneity of liberation struggles across Portuguese Africa created unsustainable military overstretch.
Compare: Angola vs. Mozambique—both Portuguese colonies gaining independence in 1975, but Angola's three-way movement split produced immediate civil war while Mozambique's unified FRELIMO initially consolidated power. Key distinction for understanding post-independence trajectories.
Southern Africa became the final frontier of white minority rule, where anti-colonial struggles intersected with anti-apartheid resistance and superpower competition. South Africa's regional dominance meant liberation movements faced not just colonial powers but a hostile neighbor committed to destabilization.
Compare: Namibia vs. Zimbabwe—both achieved independence through negotiated settlements (Lancaster House 1979, Tripartite Accord 1988), but Namibia's UN involvement created stronger international guarantees. Useful for discussing the role of international institutions in decolonization.
Not all independence struggles targeted European powers. Some conflicts challenged African states accused of perpetuating colonial-style domination over marginalized regions. These wars complicate simple narratives of decolonization by revealing how independence could reproduce oppression.
Compare: Eritrea vs. South Sudan—both achieved independence from African states rather than European powers, but Eritrea fought a unified liberation war while South Sudan's path involved two civil wars and international mediation. Essential for discussing the limits of colonial-era boundaries.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Settler colonialism's violent logic | Algeria, Kenya, Rhodesia/Zimbabwe |
| Portuguese colonial collapse | Angola, Mozambique, Guinea-Bissau |
| Cold War proxy dynamics | Angola, Namibia, South African Border War |
| Guerrilla warfare effectiveness | Guinea-Bissau (PAIGC), Mozambique (FRELIMO), Eritrea (EPLF) |
| Negotiated transitions | Zimbabwe (Lancaster House), Namibia (Tripartite Accord) |
| Post-colonial secession | Eritrea, South Sudan |
| Liberation movements as proto-states | Mozambique's liberated zones, Guinea-Bissau's declared independence |
| Colonial wars destabilizing metropoles | Algeria (French Fourth Republic), Portuguese Africa (Carnation Revolution) |
Which two conflicts best illustrate how settler colonialism produced more prolonged violence than extraction colonialism, and what specific factors extended each war?
Compare the outcomes of Angola's and Mozambique's independence struggles—why did one descend immediately into civil war while the other initially achieved stability?
How did the Eritrean and South Sudanese independence movements challenge the principle of colonial-era boundaries, and what distinguished their paths to statehood?
If an FRQ asked you to evaluate the role of Cold War dynamics in African liberation struggles, which three conflicts would provide the strongest evidence, and what would each demonstrate?
What do the Portuguese colonial wars reveal about the relationship between colonial conflicts and political change in the colonizing country? Compare the outcomes in Lisbon to those in Paris during the Algerian War.