Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Persuasion isn't just about having a good argument—it's about understanding how people are convinced and strategically deploying the right techniques at the right moments. In public speaking, you're being tested on your ability to identify these techniques in others' speeches and apply them effectively in your own. The three classical appeals (ethos, pathos, logos) form the foundation, but modern persuasion requires a full toolkit of structural and stylistic strategies that work together.
Think of persuasive techniques as falling into three categories: appeals that establish why you should listen, appeals that make you feel something, and appeals that prove something is true. When you analyze a speech or craft your own, don't just memorize technique names—know what psychological or logical principle each one activates in your audience. That's what separates a competent speaker from a truly persuasive one.
These three appeals, identified by Aristotle over 2,000 years ago, remain the backbone of persuasive communication. Every other technique you'll learn is essentially a specific method for delivering one of these appeals.
Compare: Pathos vs. Logos—both aim to persuade, but pathos moves people to feel while logos convinces them to think. Strong speeches layer both: use logos to establish your case, then pathos to motivate action. If asked to analyze a speech's effectiveness, identify which appeal dominates and why that choice fits the audience.
These techniques shape how you deliver your message, creating patterns that enhance retention and engagement. The brain processes structured information more efficiently than random points.
Compare: Repetition vs. Call to Action—repetition works throughout a speech to build momentum, while the call to action lands at the end to channel that momentum into behavior. Think of repetition as the engine and the call to action as the steering wheel.
These techniques strengthen logos by providing concrete support for your claims. Audiences are increasingly skeptical—unsupported assertions rarely persuade.
Compare: Statistics vs. Addressing Counterarguments—statistics build your positive case, while addressing counterarguments handles the negative (potential objections). A speech with only statistics seems one-sided; one that also handles counterarguments seems thorough and fair.
These techniques create psychological engagement, making audiences active participants rather than passive listeners. Engaged audiences are more persuadable.
Compare: Storytelling vs. Analogies—both make ideas concrete, but storytelling uses extended narrative while analogies use brief comparison. Use storytelling when you have time to develop emotional investment; use analogies when you need quick clarity on a complex point.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Establishing Credibility | Ethos, Statistics and Data, Addressing Counterarguments |
| Emotional Connection | Pathos, Storytelling, Rhetorical Questions |
| Logical Argumentation | Logos, Statistics and Data, Addressing Counterarguments |
| Audience Engagement | Rhetorical Questions, Storytelling, Repetition |
| Clarifying Complex Ideas | Analogies and Metaphors, Storytelling |
| Driving Behavior Change | Call to Action, Pathos, Repetition |
| Building Memorability | Repetition, Storytelling, Analogies and Metaphors |
Which two techniques both serve to strengthen logos, and how do their functions differ?
A speaker shares a personal anecdote about overcoming adversity before presenting policy recommendations. Which two appeals does this strategy strengthen, and why?
Compare and contrast rhetorical questions and calls to action: both engage the audience, but what is the key difference in when and how each is used?
If you were analyzing a speech that relied heavily on statistics but failed to address any counterarguments, what weakness would you identify in the speaker's persuasive strategy?
You're crafting a speech to convince classmates to volunteer at a local food bank. Which three techniques would you prioritize, and in what order would you deploy them? Justify your choices.