Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Personality assessment is one of the most applied topics you'll encounter in Intro Psychology—it bridges theory and real-world practice. The AP exam tests whether you understand how psychologists measure personality, why different approaches exist, and what makes a test scientifically valid versus just popular. You're being tested on the distinction between objective and projective tests, the theoretical frameworks behind different instruments (like the Big Five model versus psychodynamic approaches), and the concepts of reliability, validity, and standardization.
Don't just memorize test names and what they measure. Know what type of assessment each tool represents, what theory it's based on, and when psychologists would choose one over another. Understanding the difference between a projective test that taps the unconscious and a self-report inventory that measures observable traits is exactly the kind of comparative thinking that shows up on FRQs. Master the categories, and the individual tests will make sense.
These tests use standardized questions with fixed response options (true/false, rating scales). They're called objective because scoring doesn't require interpretation—answers are tallied according to predetermined rules. This standardization makes them highly reliable and easy to compare across populations.
Compare: MMPI vs. CPI—both are objective self-report inventories, but the MMPI targets psychopathology while the CPI assesses normal personality functioning. If an FRQ asks about assessing mental disorders, go with MMPI; for workplace applications, think CPI.
These tests are grounded in trait theory—the idea that personality consists of stable, measurable dimensions that predict behavior across situations. Different theorists proposed different numbers of core traits, which is why these tests vary in structure.
Compare: Big Five tests vs. Eysenck's EPQ—both use trait theory, but the Big Five identifies five dimensions while Eysenck argued for three biologically-based supertraits. The Big Five has more research support today, but Eysenck's biological emphasis connects personality to neuroscience.
Projective tests present ambiguous stimuli and ask individuals to interpret them. Based on psychodynamic theory, they assume responses reveal unconscious thoughts, conflicts, and desires that people can't or won't report directly. Scoring requires trained clinical judgment, making these tests more subjective and controversial.
Compare: Rorschach vs. TAT—both are projective tests tapping unconscious processes, but the Rorschach uses abstract inkblots while the TAT uses social scenes. The TAT is better for assessing interpersonal concerns; the Rorschach is broader. Both have weaker validity than objective tests—a common exam point.
Unlike trait tests that place people on continuous dimensions, type theories sort individuals into discrete categories. This categorical approach is intuitive but scientifically problematic—most personality characteristics exist on spectrums, not in boxes.
Compare: MBTI vs. Big Five—the MBTI is far more popular in workplaces, but the Big Five has much stronger scientific support. This distinction between popular and valid is a classic exam concept. Know that psychologists generally prefer trait models over type models.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Objective/Self-Report Tests | MMPI, PAI, CPI, Big Five, NEO-PI, 16PF, EPQ |
| Projective Tests | Rorschach, TAT |
| Clinical Diagnosis Focus | MMPI, PAI |
| Normal Personality Focus | CPI, Big Five, NEO-PI |
| Trait Theory Based | Big Five, NEO-PI, 16PF, EPQ |
| Type Theory Based | MBTI |
| Validity Scales Included | MMPI, EPQ |
| Psychodynamic Foundation | Rorschach, TAT |
What distinguishes objective tests from projective tests, and which assessment tools fall into each category?
Both the MMPI and CPI are objective self-report inventories. What is the key difference in their intended populations and purposes?
Compare the Big Five model and Eysenck's PEN model—how do they differ in the number of traits identified, and what theoretical approach underlies Eysenck's version?
Why do psychologists generally consider the Big Five more scientifically valid than the MBTI, despite the MBTI's popularity in organizational settings?
If an FRQ asks you to evaluate a projective test's usefulness for diagnosis, what concerns about reliability and validity should you address using the Rorschach or TAT as examples?