upgrade
upgrade

🥸Intro to Psychology

Personality Assessment Tools

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Personality assessment is one of the most applied topics you'll encounter in Intro Psychology—it bridges theory and real-world practice. The AP exam tests whether you understand how psychologists measure personality, why different approaches exist, and what makes a test scientifically valid versus just popular. You're being tested on the distinction between objective and projective tests, the theoretical frameworks behind different instruments (like the Big Five model versus psychodynamic approaches), and the concepts of reliability, validity, and standardization.

Don't just memorize test names and what they measure. Know what type of assessment each tool represents, what theory it's based on, and when psychologists would choose one over another. Understanding the difference between a projective test that taps the unconscious and a self-report inventory that measures observable traits is exactly the kind of comparative thinking that shows up on FRQs. Master the categories, and the individual tests will make sense.


Objective Self-Report Inventories

These tests use standardized questions with fixed response options (true/false, rating scales). They're called objective because scoring doesn't require interpretation—answers are tallied according to predetermined rules. This standardization makes them highly reliable and easy to compare across populations.

Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)

  • The most widely used clinical personality test—originally developed to diagnose psychological disorders, now in its third edition (MMPI-3)
  • Contains validity scales that detect lying, exaggeration, or defensiveness—a key feature that distinguishes it from other inventories
  • Empirically derived through criterion-keying, meaning questions were selected based on how well they differentiated clinical groups from healthy controls

Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI)

  • A modern alternative to the MMPI—designed specifically for clinical diagnosis and treatment planning
  • 344 items across multiple scales measuring clinical syndromes, treatment considerations, and interpersonal style
  • Uses a 4-point scale rather than true/false, allowing for more nuanced responses than dichotomous formats

California Psychological Inventory (CPI)

  • Focuses on normal personality traits—unlike the MMPI, it's designed for healthy populations rather than clinical diagnosis
  • Measures interpersonal behavior like dominance, sociability, and self-control in everyday functioning
  • Common in organizational settings for employee selection, making it a bridge between clinical and industrial-organizational psychology

Compare: MMPI vs. CPI—both are objective self-report inventories, but the MMPI targets psychopathology while the CPI assesses normal personality functioning. If an FRQ asks about assessing mental disorders, go with MMPI; for workplace applications, think CPI.


Trait-Based Assessments

These tests are grounded in trait theory—the idea that personality consists of stable, measurable dimensions that predict behavior across situations. Different theorists proposed different numbers of core traits, which is why these tests vary in structure.

Big Five Personality Test

  • Measures the five-factor model (OCEAN)—Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism
  • The most research-supported trait model—studies show these five dimensions appear across cultures and remain stable over time
  • Predicts real-world outcomes like job performance (Conscientiousness), relationship satisfaction (Agreeableness), and mental health (Neuroticism)

NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI)

  • The detailed version of Big Five assessment—breaks each factor into six specific facets for deeper analysis
  • Distinguishes normal from maladaptive traits—useful for understanding how extreme scores relate to personality disorders
  • Gold standard in research settings when psychologists need precise measurement of trait dimensions

16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF)

  • Based on Cattell's factor analysis—identified 16 source traits through statistical analysis of language
  • More granular than the Big Five—measures traits like warmth, reasoning, emotional stability, and vigilance separately
  • Used in career counseling to match personality profiles with occupational requirements

Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ)

  • Measures just three dimensions—Extraversion, Neuroticism, and Psychoticism (PEN model)
  • Rooted in biological theory—Eysenck linked traits to nervous system arousal and brain structures
  • Includes a lie scale to detect socially desirable responding, similar to MMPI validity scales

Compare: Big Five tests vs. Eysenck's EPQ—both use trait theory, but the Big Five identifies five dimensions while Eysenck argued for three biologically-based supertraits. The Big Five has more research support today, but Eysenck's biological emphasis connects personality to neuroscience.


Projective Tests

Projective tests present ambiguous stimuli and ask individuals to interpret them. Based on psychodynamic theory, they assume responses reveal unconscious thoughts, conflicts, and desires that people can't or won't report directly. Scoring requires trained clinical judgment, making these tests more subjective and controversial.

Rorschach Inkblot Test

  • Ten symmetrical inkblots presented one at a time—individuals describe what they see in each image
  • Based on the projective hypothesis—the idea that people "project" unconscious material onto ambiguous stimuli
  • Controversial reliability and validity—critics argue interpretation is too subjective, though standardized scoring systems (like the Exner system) have improved consistency

Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)

  • Shows ambiguous social scenes—individuals create stories about what's happening, revealing their concerns and motivations
  • Developed by Henry Murray—designed to measure needs like achievement, affiliation, and power
  • Focuses on interpersonal themes—particularly useful for exploring how individuals perceive relationships and social situations

Compare: Rorschach vs. TAT—both are projective tests tapping unconscious processes, but the Rorschach uses abstract inkblots while the TAT uses social scenes. The TAT is better for assessing interpersonal concerns; the Rorschach is broader. Both have weaker validity than objective tests—a common exam point.


Type-Based Assessments

Unlike trait tests that place people on continuous dimensions, type theories sort individuals into discrete categories. This categorical approach is intuitive but scientifically problematic—most personality characteristics exist on spectrums, not in boxes.

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)

  • Sorts people into 16 personality types—based on four dichotomies: Introversion/Extraversion, Sensing/Intuition, Thinking/Feeling, Judging/Perceiving
  • Based on Jung's theory of psychological types—though significantly modified from his original ideas
  • Extremely popular but scientifically weak—widely used in business and education despite poor test-retest reliability and limited predictive validity

Compare: MBTI vs. Big Five—the MBTI is far more popular in workplaces, but the Big Five has much stronger scientific support. This distinction between popular and valid is a classic exam concept. Know that psychologists generally prefer trait models over type models.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Objective/Self-Report TestsMMPI, PAI, CPI, Big Five, NEO-PI, 16PF, EPQ
Projective TestsRorschach, TAT
Clinical Diagnosis FocusMMPI, PAI
Normal Personality FocusCPI, Big Five, NEO-PI
Trait Theory BasedBig Five, NEO-PI, 16PF, EPQ
Type Theory BasedMBTI
Validity Scales IncludedMMPI, EPQ
Psychodynamic FoundationRorschach, TAT

Self-Check Questions

  1. What distinguishes objective tests from projective tests, and which assessment tools fall into each category?

  2. Both the MMPI and CPI are objective self-report inventories. What is the key difference in their intended populations and purposes?

  3. Compare the Big Five model and Eysenck's PEN model—how do they differ in the number of traits identified, and what theoretical approach underlies Eysenck's version?

  4. Why do psychologists generally consider the Big Five more scientifically valid than the MBTI, despite the MBTI's popularity in organizational settings?

  5. If an FRQ asks you to evaluate a projective test's usefulness for diagnosis, what concerns about reliability and validity should you address using the Rorschach or TAT as examples?