Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Permaculture ethics aren't just feel-good principles—they're the foundational framework that guides every design decision you'll make in this course. When you're tested on permaculture concepts, you're being evaluated on your ability to connect ethics to action, showing how abstract values like "Earth Care" translate into concrete design choices like water harvesting, polyculture planting, or community food sharing. Understanding these ethics means understanding the "why" behind every technique.
Think of the three core ethics as a lens through which all twelve design principles flow. Every principle you'll study—from "Catch and Store Energy" to "Produce No Waste"—serves one or more of these ethical foundations. Don't just memorize definitions; know which ethic each principle supports and how they work together as an integrated system. That's what separates surface-level recall from the deeper thinking your assessments will require.
These are the philosophical foundation of permaculture—the non-negotiable values that inform every principle and practice. All design decisions should pass through the filter of these three ethics.
Compare: Earth Care vs. People Care—both focus on well-being, but Earth Care centers ecosystems while People Care centers human communities. The key insight: permaculture rejects the idea that these are in conflict. If an assessment asks you to resolve a design tension, look for solutions that serve both ethics simultaneously.
These principles establish how permaculturists gather information before making design interventions. Good design requires deep understanding of existing patterns and systems.
Compare: Observe and Interact vs. Apply Self-Regulation—both involve learning from the environment, but observation happens before design while self-regulation happens during and after implementation. Think of them as the front and back ends of the design cycle.
These principles govern how energy and materials move through permaculture systems. The goal is capturing, cycling, and maximizing the utility of every resource.
Compare: Catch and Store Energy vs. Produce No Waste—both deal with resource efficiency, but catching energy focuses on inputs while producing no waste focuses on outputs. Together, they create the closed loops that define regenerative systems.
These principles guide how permaculturists translate observations into functional designs. Strategy determines whether good intentions become effective systems.
Compare: Obtain a Yield vs. Design from Patterns to Details—Obtain a Yield asks "what will this system produce?" while Design from Patterns asks "how should this system be organized?" Both questions must be answered, but pattern thinking should precede yield planning. If an FRQ presents a site design scenario, demonstrate pattern-level thinking before jumping to specific elements.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Core Ethics | Earth Care, People Care, Fair Share |
| Learning/Feedback | Observe and Interact, Apply Self-Regulation and Accept Feedback |
| Energy/Resource Capture | Catch and Store Energy, Use and Value Renewable Resources |
| Waste Elimination | Produce No Waste, closed-loop systems |
| Productivity | Obtain a Yield, multiple yield stacking |
| Design Process | Design from Patterns to Details, observation-based planning |
| Social Sustainability | People Care, Fair Share, community resilience |
Which two principles work together to create closed-loop resource systems, and what's the difference in their focus?
If you're designing a community garden, which core ethic would guide decisions about who gets access to the harvest, and what principle would help you minimize inputs from outside the system?
Compare and contrast "Observe and Interact" with "Apply Self-Regulation and Accept Feedback"—when in the design process does each principle apply?
A permaculture designer wants to install a rainwater harvesting system. Which principles support this decision, and which ethics does it serve?
Why does "Design from Patterns to Details" come before specific plant selection in the design process? What problems might occur if you reversed this sequence?