upgrade
upgrade

🥏English 11

Periods of American Literature

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Understanding American literary periods isn't just about memorizing dates and author names—it's about recognizing how literature responds to historical forces. You're being tested on your ability to connect texts to their cultural moments: how did industrialization shape Realism? Why did Modernists reject traditional forms? What social upheavals produced the Harlem Renaissance? When you can identify these cause-and-effect relationships, you'll nail both multiple-choice questions about context and essay prompts asking you to analyze a work within its era.

Each period represents a shift in what Americans believed about themselves and how writers chose to express those beliefs. The Puritans wrote to instruct and save souls; the Romantics wrote to celebrate individual spirit; the Modernists wrote to capture a fractured world. Don't just memorize that Hawthorne was a Romantic—know why his dark symbolism and moral complexity fit that movement's concerns. That's the difference between recalling facts and truly understanding literature.


Foundation and Faith: Early American Writing

The earliest American literature served practical and spiritual purposes. Writers weren't pursuing art for art's sake—they were documenting survival, justifying colonization, and reinforcing religious community. The dominant mode was didactic: literature existed to teach, persuade, and save souls.

Colonial Period (1607–1765)

  • Religious purpose drove most writing—sermons, spiritual diaries, and captivity narratives dominated because Puritan communities valued literature that reinforced faith and moral instruction
  • Plain style characterized the prose, reflecting the Puritan belief that ornate language was sinful vanity; clarity served God's truth
  • Key voices include Anne Bradstreet and Jonathan Edwards—Bradstreet's poetry explored faith and domestic life, while Edwards's sermon "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" exemplifies the era's fire-and-brimstone rhetoric

Revolutionary Period (1765–1790)

  • Literature became a weapon for political change—pamphlets, speeches, and essays replaced sermons as the dominant forms, reflecting the shift from religious to civic concerns
  • Thomas Paine's "Common Sense" sold 500,000 copies and demonstrates how accessible prose could mobilize a revolution; persuasive rhetoric was now aimed at citizens, not congregations
  • Foundational documents emerged as literary texts—the Declaration of Independence and Federalist Papers blend Enlightenment philosophy with persuasive argument, establishing a distinctly American political voice

Compare: Colonial Period vs. Revolutionary Period—both used writing as a tool for community building, but the Colonial era focused on spiritual community while the Revolutionary era built political community. If an essay asks about the purpose of early American literature, these two periods show the shift from salvation to self-governance.


Inventing America: National Identity and Romanticism

After independence, American writers faced a new challenge: what does American literature even sound like? This era saw conscious efforts to break from British literary traditions and create something distinctly national—celebrating American landscapes, folklore, and the individual spirit.

Early National Period (1790–1828)

  • Writers actively constructed American identity—Washington Irving's tales like "Rip Van Winkle" used American settings and folklore to create a national mythology independent of European traditions
  • The American short story emerged as a distinct form, suited to magazine publication and a growing literate middle class; brevity and accessibility became American literary values
  • Romantic influences from Europe blended with American themes—writers borrowed emotional intensity and interest in the past while applying these to uniquely American subjects like the frontier and democracy

Romantic Period (1828–1865)

  • Emotion, intuition, and nature trumped reason—Romantics rejected Enlightenment rationalism, celebrating instead the sublime power of wilderness and the authority of individual feeling
  • Transcendentalism formed the movement's philosophical core—Emerson's "Self-Reliance" and Thoreau's Walden argued that divinity existed in nature and the individual soul, not institutions
  • Dark Romanticism explored the shadow side—Poe's tales of madness and Hawthorne's moral allegories revealed that the American psyche contained guilt, obsession, and sin alongside optimism

Compare: Transcendentalists vs. Dark Romantics—both rejected pure rationalism and explored the inner self, but Emerson found divinity and hope there while Hawthorne and Poe found darkness and moral complexity. This tension within Romanticism is a frequent essay topic.


Holding Up the Mirror: Realism and Its Offshoots

The Civil War, industrialization, and Darwinian science shattered Romantic idealism. Writers turned from celebrating imagination to documenting reality—often unflinchingly. The question shifted from "what should America be?" to "what is America actually like?"

Realism (1865–1900)

  • Ordinary life became worthy subject matter—Realists depicted middle-class existence, regional dialects, and everyday struggles rather than heroic adventures or supernatural events
  • Mark Twain mastered vernacular voiceAdventures of Huckleberry Finn used dialect and humor to critique American society while capturing authentic speech patterns; the way people actually talked became literary
  • Psychological complexity replaced moral allegory—Henry James's novels explored consciousness and social nuance, treating character motivation with almost scientific precision

Naturalism (1890–1914)

  • Determinism replaced free will—Naturalists, influenced by Darwin and social science, portrayed characters as products of heredity and environment, trapped by forces beyond their control
  • Stephen Crane and Jack London depicted brutal conditions—whether war, poverty, or wilderness, Naturalist settings crushed individuals, revealing the indifference of nature and society
  • Social critique drove the movement—by showing how circumstances shaped (and often destroyed) people, Naturalists implicitly argued for reform; if environment determines fate, change the environment

Compare: Realism vs. Naturalism—both rejected Romantic idealization and depicted life accurately, but Realism focused on typical middle-class experience while Naturalism examined extreme conditions and emphasized forces that strip away human agency. Know which authors fit where: Twain and James are Realists; Crane and London are Naturalists.


Fragmentation and Recovery: Modern and Contemporary Voices

The twentieth century brought world wars, technological revolution, and social upheaval. Writers responded first by shattering traditional forms to capture modern chaos, then by amplifying diverse voices long excluded from the literary mainstream.

Modernism (1914–1945)

  • Traditional forms couldn't capture modern experience—Modernists experimented with fragmentation, stream of consciousness, and nonlinear narrative to reflect a world shattered by war and industrialization
  • Disillusionment defined the "Lost Generation"—Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby and Hemingway's spare prose exposed the emptiness beneath American prosperity and the trauma beneath masculine stoicism
  • The Harlem Renaissance ran parallel—writers like Langston Hughes and Zora Neale Hurston celebrated Black culture and identity, creating a distinctly African American modernism that challenged mainstream narratives

Contemporary Period (1945–Present)

  • Postmodernism questioned all narratives—writers like Don DeLillo and Thomas Pynchon used irony, metafiction, and paranoia to suggest that truth itself might be constructed or unknowable
  • Marginalized voices entered the canon—Toni Morrison, Sandra Cisneros, and Jhumpa Lahiri explored identity, race, gender, and immigration, expanding what "American literature" means and who gets to define it
  • Hybrid forms and globalization blur boundaries—contemporary literature mixes genres, incorporates multimedia influences, and reflects America's increasingly diverse and interconnected reality

Compare: Modernism vs. Postmodernism—both broke from traditional forms, but Modernists still searched for meaning amid chaos (think Eliot's mythic structures) while Postmodernists question whether stable meaning exists at all. The shift is from fragmentation as tragedy to fragmentation as condition.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Literature as religious/moral instructionColonial Period, Jonathan Edwards, Anne Bradstreet
Literature as political actionRevolutionary Period, Thomas Paine, Declaration of Independence
Building national identityEarly National Period, Washington Irving
Celebrating nature and individualismRomantic Period, Emerson, Thoreau, Whitman
Exploring psychological darknessDark Romanticism, Poe, Hawthorne
Depicting ordinary life accuratelyRealism, Mark Twain, Henry James
Showing environmental/hereditary determinismNaturalism, Stephen Crane, Jack London
Experimental form reflecting modern chaosModernism, Fitzgerald, Eliot, Hemingway
Amplifying diverse and marginalized voicesHarlem Renaissance, Contemporary Period, Morrison, Lahiri

Self-Check Questions

  1. Both the Colonial and Revolutionary periods used literature for persuasion—what shifted in terms of what writers were trying to persuade audiences to do or believe?

  2. If you encountered a passage featuring dialect, regional setting, and focus on everyday middle-class life, which period would you identify? How would you distinguish it from Naturalism?

  3. Compare and contrast Transcendentalism and Dark Romanticism: what beliefs do they share, and where do they fundamentally diverge?

  4. An FRQ asks you to analyze how historical context shapes literary technique. Using Modernism as your example, explain how World War I influenced form, not just theme.

  5. Which two periods most directly challenge the idea of a single "American identity," and how do their approaches differ?