Patient Safety Indicators

Why This Matters

Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) are the healthcare system's early warning signals—they tell us when something has gone wrong that shouldn't have happened during routine care. For your exam, understanding PSIs means grasping how healthcare organizations measure quality, identify system failures, and implement improvements. These indicators connect directly to broader concepts like risk management, quality improvement cycles, and evidence-based practice. When you see a high PSI rate, you're not just seeing a number—you're seeing a breakdown in protocols, training, or system design.

The key insight here is that PSIs fall into predictable categories based on what went wrong and when. Some track procedure-related complications (things that happen during interventions), others measure postoperative failures (breakdowns in recovery care), and still others capture hospital-acquired conditions (problems that develop simply from being hospitalized). Don't just memorize which indicator tracks which complication—know what type of system failure each one reveals and what prevention strategies address it.

---

Procedure-Related Complications

These indicators capture harm that occurs during medical interventions—moments when technical skill, training, and protocol adherence are being tested in real time. The underlying principle: procedures carry inherent risks, but preventable errors signal training gaps or protocol failures.

Iatrogenic Pneumothorax Rate

• Tracks lung punctures caused by medical procedures—most commonly during central line placement, thoracentesis, or mechanical ventilation
• High rates indicate technical skill deficits or inadequate use of ultrasound guidance during invasive procedures
• Prevention focus: simulation training, mandatory imaging guidance, and competency verification protocols

Accidental Puncture or Laceration Rate

• Measures unintended injuries to organs or vessels during surgical or diagnostic procedures
• Elevated rates suggest procedural protocol gaps—often related to surgical technique, anatomical variation awareness, or time pressure
• System-level interventions include surgical checklists, timeout procedures, and near-miss reporting systems

Transfusion Reaction Rate

• Captures adverse responses to blood products—ranging from mild allergic reactions to fatal hemolytic events
• High rates signal blood bank protocol failures, particularly in patient identification and type-and-screen verification
• Two-nurse verification and electronic matching systems are standard prevention strategies

---

Postoperative Complications

These indicators reveal what happens after surgery when monitoring, prophylaxis, and early intervention systems are critical. The principle: surgical patients are vulnerable populations requiring systematic prevention protocols.

Postoperative Pulmonary Embolism or Deep Vein Thrombosis Rate

• Tracks venous thromboembolism (VTE) following surgery—a leading cause of preventable hospital death
• High rates indicate prophylaxis failures—inadequate anticoagulation, delayed mobilization, or missed risk stratification
• Prevention triad: pharmacologic prophylaxis, mechanical compression devices, and early ambulation protocols

Postoperative Sepsis Rate

• Measures systemic infection developing after surgical procedures—often from surgical site infections that spread
• Elevated rates suggest gaps in sterile technique, antibiotic timing, or early warning system responsiveness
• Sepsis bundles (early recognition, cultures, antibiotics, fluid resuscitation) are the standard intervention framework

Postoperative Wound Dehiscence Rate

• Indicates surgical wounds reopening after closure—a serious complication requiring additional intervention
• High rates reflect surgical technique issues (closure method, tension management) or patient factors (malnutrition, diabetes, obesity)
• Prevention strategies include optimizing nutrition preoperatively and selecting appropriate closure techniques for high-risk patients

Postoperative Hip Fracture Rate

• Tracks falls resulting in hip fractures during surgical recovery—particularly significant in elderly populations
• Elevated rates indicate fall prevention protocol failures or inadequate mobility assessment
• Multifactorial prevention includes medication review, environmental modifications, and physical therapy involvement

---

Hospital-Acquired Conditions

These indicators measure harm that develops simply from being hospitalized—conditions that wouldn't have occurred if the patient had stayed home. The principle: hospitalization itself creates risks that require proactive prevention systems.

Pressure Ulcer Rate

• Measures skin breakdown from sustained pressure—particularly in immobile or critically ill patients
• High rates indicate nursing care gaps in repositioning schedules, skin assessment frequency, and support surface use
• Prevention is protocol-driven: every-two-hour turning, pressure-redistributing mattresses, and nutritional optimization

Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Rate

• Tracks infections caused by central line presence—a classic hospital-acquired condition with significant mortality
• Elevated rates signal sterile technique failures during insertion or maintenance, or excessive catheter dwell time
• Central line bundles (hand hygiene, barrier precautions, chlorhexidine prep, optimal site selection, daily necessity review) are evidence-based prevention

---

Failure-to-Rescue Indicators

This category captures the healthcare system's ability to recognize and respond to deterioration—measuring not whether complications occur, but whether patients survive them. The principle: complications are sometimes unavoidable, but deaths from treatable complications are system failures.

Death Rate among Surgical Inpatients with Serious Treatable Complications

• Measures mortality in patients who develop complications that should be survivable—the ultimate failure-to-rescue metric
• High rates indicate surveillance failures, delayed recognition, or inadequate escalation protocols
• Improvement strategies include rapid response teams, early warning scoring systems, and intensive care capacity planning

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two PSIs would you use to evaluate a hospital's infection control program, and what distinguishes the system failures each one reveals?

2. A quality improvement team wants to reduce procedure-related harm. Which three indicators should they track, and what common intervention (hint: it involves training) addresses all three?

3. Compare and contrast Postoperative Sepsis Rate and Central Line Infection Rate—both involve infection, but what's different about when and how these infections develop?

4. If an FRQ asks you to explain the difference between measuring complication rates versus failure-to-rescue rates, which indicator best illustrates the failure-to-rescue concept, and why does this distinction matter for quality assessment?

5. A hospital reports high rates for both Pressure Ulcers and Postoperative Hip Fractures. What common underlying system weakness might explain both, and what department would likely lead the improvement initiative?