Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Opportunity cost isn't just another vocabulary term to memorize—it's the foundation of economic thinking itself. Every question on your exam about decision-making, resource allocation, or trade-offs connects back to this concept. When you understand opportunity cost, you're not just answering definition questions; you're equipped to analyze production possibilities curves, evaluate government policy decisions, and explain why individuals and firms behave the way they do. This concept threads through microeconomics (consumer and producer choices) and macroeconomics (fiscal policy trade-offs) alike.
The examples below demonstrate how opportunity cost operates across different economic actors: individuals, firms, and governments. You're being tested on your ability to identify what's being given up, not just what's being chosen. Don't just memorize these scenarios—know which type of trade-off each one illustrates and be ready to apply the concept to new situations. The best answer on an FRQ isn't "they had an opportunity cost"—it's identifying the specific next-best alternative that was sacrificed.
Every person faces scarcity of time and money. These examples show how individuals weigh immediate benefits against long-term gains—a classic tension in economic decision-making. The opportunity cost is always the value of the next-best alternative, not all alternatives combined.
Compare: College vs. employment and vacation vs. retirement savings—both involve trading present benefits for future gains. The difference? College is an investment in human capital with expected returns, while retirement savings is deferred consumption. FRQs love asking you to distinguish investment from consumption trade-offs.
Businesses face opportunity costs with every resource allocation decision. Because firms have limited capital, labor, and time, choosing one investment means sacrificing another. These trade-offs directly affect competitiveness and profitability.
Compare: Company expansion vs. farmer crop selection—both involve allocating scarce resources (capital vs. land) based on expected returns. The key difference is reversibility: farmers can switch crops next season, but factory investments lock up capital for years. This affects how each decision-maker weighs risk.
Governments face opportunity costs with every budget decision. Public resources are finite, so funding one program means less funding for others. These examples illustrate how societies express collective priorities through resource allocation.
Compare: Healthcare vs. education and guns vs. butter—both are government allocation decisions, but guns vs. butter is more useful for PPC analysis because the goods are more clearly distinct. Healthcare vs. education better illustrates merit goods trade-offs where both options generate positive externalities. Use guns/butter for graphing questions; use healthcare/education for policy analysis.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Human capital investment | College vs. employment, job offer selection |
| Intertemporal choice (present vs. future) | Vacation vs. retirement, college decision |
| PPC and resource allocation | Guns vs. butter, crop selection |
| Government budget trade-offs | Healthcare vs. education, land use |
| Firm capital allocation | Expansion vs. technology investment |
| Non-monetary opportunity costs | Studying vs. socializing, job selection |
| Risk vs. return trade-offs | Stocks vs. savings, crop diversification |
| Scarcity of land/resources | Housing vs. parks, crop selection |
Both the college decision and the vacation-vs-retirement trade-off involve present versus future benefits. What distinguishes an investment opportunity cost from a consumption opportunity cost?
A farmer plants wheat instead of corn. Identify the opportunity cost and explain how price signals influenced this decision.
Compare and contrast the guns-vs-butter trade-off with the healthcare-vs-education trade-off. Which is more useful for illustrating a production possibilities curve, and why?
When evaluating two job offers, why might an economist argue that the higher-salary option has a higher opportunity cost than the lower-salary option with better benefits?
(FRQ-style) A city council must decide whether to convert vacant land into affordable housing or a public park. Identify the opportunity cost of choosing the park, explain one positive externality of each option, and describe how the concept of scarcity applies to this decision.