Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Nutritional assessment is the foundation of everything you'll do in clinical nutrition—you can't design an intervention without first understanding a patient's current status. On your exam, you're being tested on more than just knowing that BMI exists or that blood tests measure nutrients. You need to understand which assessment method answers which clinical question, the strengths and limitations of each approach, and how to combine multiple methods for a complete nutritional picture.
These methods demonstrate key principles like validity versus reliability, subjective versus objective data, and screening versus diagnostic assessment. When you encounter exam questions, think about what each method actually measures, what it misses, and when you'd choose one over another. Don't just memorize the list—know why a clinician would reach for a 24-hour recall instead of a food frequency questionnaire, or when biochemical data trumps anthropometric measurements.
These methods rely on patient-reported information about dietary intake. While they're cost-effective and non-invasive, they're subject to recall bias and underreporting—limitations you'll need to account for in clinical practice.
Compare: 24-hour recall vs. food frequency questionnaire—both assess dietary intake, but recall captures detailed short-term data while FFQs reveal long-term patterns. If an FRQ asks about assessing usual dietary habits for chronic disease risk, FFQ is your answer; for acute clinical assessment, go with multiple 24-hour recalls.
Anthropometric methods use body measurements to evaluate growth, nutritional status, and disease risk. These are objective, non-invasive, and inexpensive—but they describe body size without revealing underlying causes.
Compare: BMI vs. waist circumference—both assess body size, but BMI reflects overall mass while waist circumference specifically targets visceral fat distribution. Remember: a muscular athlete may have elevated BMI but healthy waist circumference.
These techniques go beyond weight and height to quantify what the body is made of—distinguishing metabolically active lean mass from fat mass and assessing hydration status.
Compare: BIA vs. DXA—both estimate body composition, but BIA is portable and affordable while DXA provides superior accuracy and regional detail. For research protocols or clinical diagnosis, DXA is preferred; for routine monitoring and population screening, BIA offers practical advantages.
Laboratory tests provide objective, quantitative data on nutrient status at the tissue level. These methods detect deficiencies before clinical signs appear and confirm suspected nutritional problems.
Compare: Serum albumin vs. prealbumin—both assess protein status, but albumin has a 20-day half-life (reflecting long-term status) while prealbumin's 2-day half-life makes it more sensitive to acute changes. For monitoring response to nutritional intervention, prealbumin is your better indicator.
Physical examination identifies visible signs of nutritional deficiency or excess. This method requires clinical expertise to distinguish nutritional findings from other pathology.
Compare: Clinical examination vs. biochemical tests—clinical signs are observable without equipment but appear late in deficiency progression, while biochemical markers detect subclinical deficiency early. A thorough assessment uses both: biochemical tests for early detection, clinical exam for confirmation and severity assessment.
| Assessment Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Habitual dietary patterns | Food frequency questionnaire, multiple-day food diary |
| Acute dietary intake | 24-hour recall, single-day food record |
| Central adiposity risk | Waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio |
| Precise body composition | DXA, hydrostatic weighing |
| Field-practical body composition | BIA, skinfold measurements |
| Early deficiency detection | Biochemical tests, functional biomarkers |
| Protein-energy status | Serum albumin, prealbumin, handgrip strength |
| Late-stage deficiency confirmation | Clinical examination signs |
A researcher wants to assess the relationship between long-term dietary fat intake and cardiovascular disease risk in 5,000 participants. Which dietary assessment method is most appropriate, and why might 24-hour recalls be problematic for this study?
Compare and contrast BMI and waist circumference as indicators of health risk. In what clinical scenario might a patient have a normal BMI but still warrant concern based on anthropometric assessment?
You need to monitor a hospitalized patient's response to nutritional support over one week. Would you choose serum albumin or prealbumin to track progress? Explain the physiological basis for your choice.
Which two body composition methods would you compare if asked about the trade-off between accuracy and practicality? What specific factors affect the validity of the more practical method?
A patient presents with fatigue and pallor. Outline how you would use biochemical tests and clinical examination together to assess iron status—what would each method contribute to your diagnosis?