Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Ethical principles aren't just abstract philosophy—they're the decision-making framework you'll use every single shift. When a patient refuses a life-saving treatment, when resources are limited, when family members want information the patient hasn't authorized you to share, these principles guide your actions. You're being tested on your ability to identify which principle applies in complex scenarios and justify nursing interventions based on ethical reasoning.
Understanding these principles means recognizing that they often compete with each other. A patient's autonomy might conflict with your duty of beneficence; veracity might create tension with non-maleficence. The NCLEX loves scenarios where you must prioritize one principle over another—so don't just memorize definitions. Know how each principle shapes nursing action and when one principle takes precedence.
These principles place the patient at the center of care decisions, recognizing their inherent right to participate in and direct their own healthcare. The underlying mechanism is respect for persons as rational agents capable of self-determination.
Compare: Autonomy vs. Informed Consent—both protect patient self-determination, but autonomy is the principle while informed consent is the process that operationalizes it. If an exam scenario describes a patient signing forms without understanding, the violation is informed consent; if staff override a competent patient's wishes, the violation is autonomy.
These principles define the nurse's obligation to actively benefit patients while preventing harm. They reflect the fiduciary nature of the nurse-patient relationship—patients trust nurses to act in their best interest.
Compare: Beneficence vs. Non-Maleficence—beneficence requires action (do good), while non-maleficence requires restraint (avoid harm). A chemotherapy decision illustrates both: beneficence supports treatment that may cure cancer; non-maleficence demands careful monitoring of toxic side effects. Exam questions often test whether you can distinguish "doing good" from "preventing harm."
These principles establish the foundation of therapeutic nurse-patient relationships through honesty, reliability, and protection of sensitive information. Trust is the mechanism that enables patients to be vulnerable and share information essential for their care.
Compare: Veracity vs. Confidentiality—both involve information management, but veracity governs what you tell the patient, while confidentiality governs what you tell others about the patient. A scenario where family members ask about a patient's HIV status tests confidentiality; a scenario where a patient asks "Am I dying?" tests veracity.
These principles address the nurse's obligations to society, the profession, and equitable treatment of all patients. They recognize that nursing occurs within systems that can perpetuate or challenge injustice.
Compare: Justice vs. Accountability—justice focuses on fairness to patients (equitable treatment), while accountability focuses on responsibility of the nurse (answering for practice). A nurse who spends more time with patients they personally like violates justice; a nurse who fails to report a medication error violates accountability.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Patient self-determination | Autonomy, Informed Consent, Respect for Human Dignity |
| Active duty to help | Beneficence |
| Duty to prevent harm | Non-Maleficence |
| Honest communication | Veracity |
| Reliability and promises | Fidelity |
| Information protection | Confidentiality |
| Equitable treatment | Justice |
| Professional responsibility | Accountability |
A competent patient refuses a blood transfusion that would save their life. Which two principles support honoring this decision, and how do they work together?
You discover a colleague has been accessing patient records for people not in their care. Which ethical principle has been violated, and what is your accountability obligation?
Compare and contrast beneficence and non-maleficence using the example of administering pain medication with sedating side effects.
A family member demands to know their adult child's diagnosis. The patient has not authorized disclosure. Which principle guides your response, and how does it relate to veracity when the family member asks, "Is it serious?"
During a disaster with limited ventilators, how does the principle of justice guide allocation decisions, and how might this conflict with beneficence toward individual patients?