Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Photography exhibitions don't just display images—they define how we understand the medium itself. The shows on this list fundamentally shaped debates about what photography is, what it should do, and whether it qualifies as art. You're being tested on your ability to recognize how curatorial vision transforms individual photographs into arguments about the medium's identity, social function, and aesthetic possibilities.
These landmark exhibitions introduced frameworks that photographers and critics still use today: the tension between documentary objectivity and personal expression, the question of photography's relationship to other visual arts, and the medium's power to construct or critique cultural narratives. Don't just memorize exhibition names and dates—know what conceptual shift each show represented and how it challenged or built upon what came before.
These exhibitions tackled a fundamental question: what makes photography distinct from painting, drawing, and other visual arts? Curators used these shows to argue that the medium has its own formal language and aesthetic criteria.
Compare: The Photographer's Eye vs. Before Photography—both examined photography's identity, but Szarkowski's show emphasized what makes photography unique, while Before Photography explored what connects it to earlier visual traditions. If asked about photography's relationship to art history, these two exhibitions offer opposing entry points.
These exhibitions positioned photography as a tool for bearing witness to human experience and social conditions. The camera becomes an instrument of conscience, recording realities that demand attention and response.
Compare: The Family of Man vs. The Americans—both addressed American identity, but Steichen emphasized universal humanity and hope, while Frank offered a darker, more critical perspective. This contrast illustrates the shift from collective optimism to individual skepticism in postwar photography.
These exhibitions marked a decisive shift: documentary photography became less about objective recording and more about the photographer's subjective vision. The line between document and self-expression blurred.
Compare: New Documents vs. Mirrors and Windows—both curated by Szarkowski, but New Documents announced a shift toward subjectivity, while Mirrors and Windows provided a theoretical framework for understanding that shift. The later show essentially explained what the earlier show had introduced.
These exhibitions redefined landscape photography by moving away from romantic wilderness imagery toward critical examination of human impact on the land.
Compare: The New Topographics vs. The Americans—both offered critical perspectives on American culture, but Frank focused on people and social dynamics, while the New Topographics photographers examined the built environment. Together, they represent photography's capacity to critique both social and physical landscapes.
These comprehensive exhibitions attempted to narrate photography's entire history, establishing canons and defining what counts as significant in the medium's development.
Compare: Photography Until Now vs. Cruel and Tender—Szarkowski's show emphasized formal and technical evolution, while Cruel and Tender organized photography around emotional and ethical themes. This reflects a broader shift from formalist to contextual approaches in exhibition-making.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Photography as distinct art form | The Photographer's Eye, Before Photography |
| Humanist documentary tradition | The Family of Man, The Bitter Years |
| Critical/subjective documentary | The Americans, New Documents |
| Theoretical frameworks for the medium | Mirrors and Windows, The Photographer's Eye |
| Landscape and environment | The New Topographics |
| Historical surveys | Photography Until Now, Cruel and Tender |
| Szarkowski's curatorial influence | The Photographer's Eye, New Documents, Mirrors and Windows, Photography Until Now |
| MoMA's institutional role | All except The New Topographics and Cruel and Tender |
Which two exhibitions both addressed American identity but offered contrasting perspectives—one optimistic and universal, one critical and subjective? What accounts for the shift between them?
John Szarkowski curated four major exhibitions on this list. What common argument about photography's nature runs through his curatorial work, and how did each show develop that argument?
If an FRQ asked you to explain the shift from "objective" to "subjective" documentary photography, which two exhibitions would you cite as evidence, and what specific photographers would you reference?
Compare The Photographer's Eye and Before Photography: how do these exhibitions offer different answers to the question "What is photography's relationship to other visual arts?"
The New Topographics is often cited as a turning point in landscape photography. What tradition did it reject, what aesthetic did it introduce, and how does its approach connect to broader environmental concerns?