Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Understanding historical earthquakes isn't just about memorizing dates and death tolls—it's about recognizing the tectonic mechanisms, secondary hazards, and societal responses that define seismology as a discipline. These events demonstrate how plate boundaries behave, why certain regions face elevated risk, and how human factors like building construction, population density, and emergency preparedness determine whether an earthquake becomes a catastrophe. You're being tested on your ability to connect specific events to broader concepts: subduction zone dynamics, intraplate seismicity, liquefaction, tsunami generation, and the evolution of seismic engineering.
Each earthquake on this list illustrates something distinct about how the Earth moves and how societies respond. The 1906 San Francisco quake revolutionized building codes; the 2004 Indian Ocean event transformed global warning systems; the New Madrid sequence proved that devastating earthquakes can strike far from plate boundaries. Don't just memorize magnitudes—know what concept each earthquake best exemplifies and why it changed our understanding of seismic hazards.
The most powerful earthquakes on Earth occur where oceanic plates dive beneath continental plates, building enormous stress that releases in magnitude 9.0+ events. Megathrust earthquakes involve rupture along shallow-dipping fault planes, often displacing the seafloor and generating transoceanic tsunamis.
Compare: 1960 Valdivia vs. 2011 Tōhoku—both megathrust events generated devastating tsunamis, but Chile's occurred in a less densely populated region while Japan's exposed vulnerabilities in nuclear infrastructure. If an FRQ asks about cascading hazards, Tōhoku is your best example.
Transform boundaries produce powerful but typically smaller earthquakes than subduction zones. Strike-slip motion along vertical fault planes releases stress horizontally, and shallow focal depths concentrate damage in narrow zones along the fault trace.
Compare: 1906 San Francisco vs. 2011 Tōhoku—both revealed critical infrastructure vulnerabilities (water systems vs. nuclear plants), but San Francisco's legacy was improved building codes while Tōhoku's was reassessing nuclear safety near subduction zones.
Some of the most surprising seismic events occur far from plate boundaries, where ancient faults reactivate under regional stress. Intraplate earthquakes challenge simple plate tectonic models and demonstrate that seismic hazard exists even in continental interiors.
Compare: 1556 Shaanxi vs. 1920 Haiyuan—both occurred in China's loess plateau region where soft sediments amplify shaking and collapse catastrophically. These events illustrate how site effects and building materials determine death tolls more than magnitude alone.
Some earthquakes are notable less for their size than for their intellectual or institutional impact. These events forced new ways of thinking about natural hazards, human vulnerability, and societal responsibility.
Compare: 1755 Lisbon vs. 1976 Tangshan—both were pivotal moments that transformed how governments approach earthquake risk. Lisbon sparked philosophical and scientific inquiry; Tangshan drove practical policy reform in building codes and emergency response.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Megathrust/Subduction Zone Events | 1960 Valdivia, 1964 Alaska, 2004 Indian Ocean, 2011 Tōhoku |
| Transform Fault Earthquakes | 1906 San Francisco |
| Intraplate Seismicity | 1811-1812 New Madrid, 1556 Shaanxi |
| Tsunami Generation | 1960 Valdivia, 2004 Indian Ocean, 2011 Tōhoku, 1755 Lisbon |
| Secondary Hazards (Fire, Landslides) | 1906 San Francisco, 1920 Haiyuan, 1556 Shaanxi |
| Site Effects/Soft Sediments | 1556 Shaanxi, 1920 Haiyuan, 1811-1812 New Madrid |
| Policy/Building Code Changes | 1906 San Francisco, 1976 Tangshan, 2004 Indian Ocean |
| Highest Death Tolls | 1556 Shaanxi, 1976 Tangshan, 2004 Indian Ocean |
Which two earthquakes best illustrate how soft sediment site effects amplify damage and casualties, and what geological feature do their regions share?
Compare the 1960 Valdivia and 2004 Indian Ocean earthquakes: both were megathrust events generating transoceanic tsunamis, but what key difference in warning infrastructure explains the disparity in tsunami casualties?
The 1811-1812 New Madrid sequence occurred far from any plate boundary. What tectonic feature explains intraplate seismicity in this region, and why does this matter for hazard assessment in the central United States?
If an FRQ asked you to discuss how a single earthquake can trigger multiple secondary hazards, which event would you choose and what three distinct hazard types would you describe?
Compare the lasting impacts of the 1906 San Francisco and 1976 Tangshan earthquakes on earthquake preparedness policy. What specific changes did each event drive?