Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
When you're leading a nonprofit or social enterprise, the governance model you choose isn't just an organizational chart—it's the operating system that determines who holds power, how decisions get made, and who the organization ultimately serves. You're being tested on your ability to recognize how different governance structures create distinct patterns of authority, accountability, and stakeholder engagement. The real exam challenge isn't memorizing model names; it's understanding why an organization might choose one structure over another and what trade-offs come with that choice.
These models reflect fundamental tensions in nonprofit leadership: board control vs. executive agility, stakeholder representation vs. decision-making efficiency, and external oversight vs. internal responsiveness. Don't just memorize the features of each model—know what problem each one solves and what new challenges it creates. When you see a case study or scenario question, ask yourself: Where does authority sit? Who's accountable to whom? And how does this structure serve (or hinder) the mission?
These models place primary governance power with the board of directors, emphasizing collective decision-making and clear separation between governance and operations. They represent the traditional nonprofit structure and prioritize accountability through formal oversight.
Compare: Traditional Model vs. Policy Governance—both center authority in the board, but Traditional involves the board in more operational decisions while Carver delegates execution entirely to the ED. If a case asks about board micromanagement problems, Policy Governance is your reform recommendation.
These structures shift significant decision-making power to the organization's professional leadership. The trade-off is agility for oversight—faster decisions, but potentially weaker checks on executive authority.
Compare: Executive-Centered vs. Management Team—both minimize traditional board authority, but Executive-Centered concentrates power in one leader while Management Team distributes it among staff. Consider which creates more accountability gaps.
These models prioritize voice and representation in governance, ensuring that those affected by the organization's work have a seat at the decision-making table. They address questions of legitimacy and democratic participation.
Compare: Constituent Board vs. Collective Governance—both emphasize representation, but Constituent Board uses designated seats while Collective Governance gives all members equal voice. FRQs about equity and power-sharing often distinguish between these approaches.
These structures organize governance around the organization's resource needs, particularly fundraising capacity and donor relationships. They raise important questions about whose interests governance ultimately serves.
Compare: Patron Board vs. Advisory Board—both leverage external relationships, but Patron Board members hold actual governance power while Advisory Board members only recommend. Know this distinction for questions about fiduciary duty and accountability.
When no single model fits an organization's needs, leaders often blend approaches. Flexibility is the strength; clarity is the challenge.
Compare: Hybrid Model vs. any "pure" model—Hybrid offers customization but requires more intentional design work. When analyzing a struggling organization, consider whether governance confusion stems from poorly designed hybrid structures.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Board-centered authority | Traditional Model, Policy Governance (Carver) |
| Executive-centered authority | Executive-Centered Model, Management Team Model |
| Stakeholder representation | Constituent Board, Collective Governance, Cooperative Model |
| Resource/donor focus | Patron Governance, Advisory Board |
| Flexibility and adaptation | Hybrid Model |
| Fastest decision-making | Executive-Centered, Management Team |
| Strongest external oversight | Traditional Model, Policy Governance |
| Highest stakeholder engagement | Collective Governance, Cooperative Model |
Which two governance models both minimize traditional board authority but distribute power differently—one to a single leader and one to a group of managers?
An organization's board spends most meetings reviewing whether the ED has operated within established policy boundaries rather than approving individual decisions. Which governance model does this describe, and what's its primary advantage over the Traditional Model?
Compare and contrast the Constituent Board Model and the Collective Governance Model. How do they each address stakeholder representation, and what different challenges does each create?
A nonprofit's board consists entirely of major donors who focus meetings on fundraising strategy. What governance model is this, and what accountability concern should the organization monitor?
If an FRQ presents an organization struggling with slow decision-making due to board micromanagement, which governance model would you recommend as a reform—and what trade-off would you warn leadership about?