Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Neural networks are the computational engines driving modern cognitive computing—and understanding their architectures is essential for making smart business technology decisions. You're being tested not just on what these networks do, but on why specific architectures solve specific business problems. The key principles here include data flow patterns, memory mechanisms, feature extraction approaches, and learning paradigms (supervised vs. unsupervised vs. adversarial).
When exam questions ask you to recommend a solution or analyze a business case, you need to match the architecture to the problem type. A customer churn prediction model requires different capabilities than a product image classifier or a chatbot. Don't just memorize names—know what data structure each architecture handles best (sequential, spatial, tabular) and what business outcome it optimizes for.
These architectures excel when the order of information matters—think time series, customer journeys, or language. They maintain some form of memory or attention mechanism that captures temporal dependencies.
Compare: RNNs vs. Transformers—both handle sequential data, but RNNs process step-by-step while Transformers use attention to process in parallel. For FRQs about scalability or modern NLP applications, Transformers are your answer; for simpler time-series with limited compute, RNNs may suffice.
When your data has grid-like structure—images, videos, or even structured sensor arrays—these architectures detect meaningful patterns through specialized filtering operations.
Compare: CNNs vs. RBFNs—CNNs excel at high-dimensional spatial data (images) through hierarchical filtering, while RBFNs work better for lower-dimensional tabular data where distance relationships matter. If the exam mentions visual data, think CNN; for customer clustering by attributes, consider RBFN.
These simpler architectures form the building blocks for understanding more complex networks. They process data in straightforward ways without specialized memory or spatial mechanisms.
Compare: FNNs vs. RNNs—both can handle tabular business data, but FNNs treat each input independently while RNNs capture sequential dependencies. Choose FNN for snapshot predictions, RNN when history matters.
These architectures find patterns without labeled training data—essential when you have massive datasets but limited human-annotated examples. They discover structure through clustering, compression, or self-organization.
Compare: Autoencoders vs. SOMs—both reduce dimensionality, but autoencoders optimize for reconstruction accuracy while SOMs optimize for topological preservation. Use autoencoders for anomaly detection; use SOMs when you need visual, interpretable cluster maps for business presentations.
These networks don't just classify or predict—they create new data. They learn the underlying distribution of training data well enough to generate realistic synthetic examples.
Compare: GANs vs. Autoencoders—both can generate data, but GANs produce sharper, more realistic outputs through adversarial training while autoencoders tend toward blurrier reconstructions. For creative content generation, GANs are superior; for anomaly detection, autoencoders are more practical.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Sequential/Temporal Data | RNN, LSTM, Transformer |
| Spatial/Image Data | CNN |
| Basic Classification/Regression | FNN, RBFN |
| Unsupervised Feature Learning | DBN, Autoencoder, SOM |
| Anomaly Detection | Autoencoder |
| Data Generation | GAN |
| Natural Language Processing | Transformer, LSTM, RNN |
| Customer Segmentation | SOM, RBFN |
A retail company wants to predict next-quarter sales based on the past 24 months of transaction data. Which two architectures would handle this sequential forecasting task, and what advantage does one have over the other for long sequences?
Compare and contrast how CNNs and FNNs process input data. Why would a quality control image inspection system require a CNN rather than a standard feedforward network?
Your client needs to detect fraudulent insurance claims in a dataset where only 0.1% of claims are fraudulent. Which architecture learns "normal" patterns and flags deviations, and how does its encoder-decoder structure enable this?
A marketing team wants to generate realistic product images for items that don't exist yet. Explain why a GAN's adversarial training process produces more realistic outputs than a standard autoencoder would.
If an FRQ asks you to recommend an architecture for a customer service chatbot that needs to understand context across long conversations, which architecture should you choose and what mechanism makes it superior to RNNs for this task?