Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Moment of inertia isn't just another formula to memorize—it's the rotational equivalent of mass, and it determines how objects respond to torques in everything from spinning flywheels to swinging crane arms. You're being tested on your ability to select the correct formula for a given geometry, apply axis theorems to shift reference points, and understand why mass distribution matters more than total mass when it comes to rotation.
The key insight is this: mass farther from the rotation axis contributes more to rotational inertia. That's why a hollow cylinder resists angular acceleration more than a solid one of the same mass, and why the parallel axis theorem always adds inertia when you move away from the centroid. Don't just memorize the fractions in front of each formula—understand what geometric principle each one represents and when to apply the powerful shortcut theorems.
These two theorems are your problem-solving workhorses. They let you calculate moment of inertia about any axis once you know the centroidal value, saving you from integrating every time.
Compare: Parallel Axis Theorem vs. Perpendicular Axis Theorem—both simplify complex calculations, but parallel axis works for any rigid body while perpendicular axis applies only to flat shapes. FRQs often test whether you know this limitation.
Rotating machinery, shafts, wheels, and pipes all fall into this category. The key variable is how mass is distributed radially from the central axis.
Compare: Solid cylinder about central axis () vs. disc about diameter ()—same object, different axis, half the inertia. Exam problems love testing whether you've identified the correct rotation axis.
Thin rods are idealized as having all mass along a line. The axis location relative to the rod's length dramatically changes the result.
Compare: Rod about center () vs. rod about end ()—this is the classic parallel axis theorem example. If an FRQ gives you the centroidal inertia and asks about an end pivot, you must add .
Flat rectangular shapes appear in structural analysis, doors, and panels. Pay attention to which dimension defines the rotation axis.
Compare: Plate about centroid vs. plate about edge—the coefficient jumps from 1/12 to 1/3, exactly as with rods. Recognizing this pattern helps you catch errors quickly on exams.
These geometries appear less frequently but are still fair game, especially for conceptual questions about mass distribution.
Compare: Solid sphere () vs. solid cylinder ()—for the same mass and radius, the sphere has lower inertia because its 3D mass distribution places more material near the axis. This matters in rolling-without-slipping problems.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Axis theorems | Parallel Axis Theorem, Perpendicular Axis Theorem |
| Cylindrical symmetry (central axis) | Solid Cylinder, Hollow Cylinder |
| Planar rotation (in-plane axis) | Disc About Diameter, Rectangular Plate About Centroid |
| Slender members | Thin Rod About Center, Thin Rod About End |
| Edge rotation | Rectangular Plate About Edge, Thin Rod About End |
| 3D solid bodies | Solid Sphere, Solid Cylinder |
| Coefficient = 1/2 | Solid Cylinder, Hollow Cylinder (with modified term) |
| Coefficient = 1/12 (centroidal) | Thin Rod About Center, Rectangular Plate (in-plane axis) |
A solid cylinder and a hollow cylinder have the same mass and outer radius. Which has the greater moment of inertia about the central axis, and why?
You know the moment of inertia of a thin rod about its center is . Using the parallel axis theorem, derive the moment of inertia about one end.
The perpendicular axis theorem applies to which type of bodies—3D solids, planar laminae, or both? What's the key limitation?
Compare and contrast: A circular disc rotating about its central axis versus rotating about a diameter. Which has greater inertia, and by what factor?
An FRQ shows a composite body made of a rectangular plate with a rod attached at its edge. What strategy would you use to find the total moment of inertia about the plate's opposite edge?