Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Cleavage is one of the most diagnostic physical properties you'll use to identify minerals in lab practicals and on exams. When a mineral breaks along planes of weakness in its crystal structure, it's revealing something fundamental about how its atoms are arranged internally. You're being tested not just on what cleavage looks like, but on why different minerals break the way they do—and that comes down to bond strength and atomic geometry.
Understanding cleavage connects directly to crystallography, crystal systems, and the relationship between internal structure and external properties. When you see terms like "three directions at 90°" or "parallel to the base," you should immediately visualize the underlying lattice. Don't just memorize that calcite has rhombohedral cleavage—know that this reflects its trigonal crystal system and the orientation of its weakest bonds. That conceptual understanding is what separates a good exam answer from a great one.
The quality of cleavage describes how easily and smoothly a mineral splits along its planes of weakness. This depends on how much bond strength varies between different directions in the crystal lattice—greater contrast means cleaner breaks.
Compare: Perfect cleavage (mica) vs. poor cleavage (quartz)—both are common silicates, but mica's sheet structure creates dramatic bond weakness in one direction while quartz's 3D framework has uniform bonding. If asked to explain why two silicates break differently, this contrast illustrates how atomic arrangement controls physical properties.
The geometry of cleavage reflects the crystal system and the spatial arrangement of weak bond planes. Counting cleavage directions and measuring angles between them are essential identification skills.
Compare: Basal cleavage (1 direction) vs. cubic cleavage (3 directions at 90°)—both produce clean breaks, but basal cleavage creates sheets while cubic creates blocks. The number of directions directly reflects crystal system symmetry.
Some minerals display cleavage in multiple directions at angles other than 90°, producing distinctive fragment shapes that reflect their unique crystal symmetries.
Compare: Rhombohedral (calcite) vs. cubic (halite) cleavage—both have three cleavage directions, but the angles differ (not 90° vs. exactly 90°). This is a common exam question: same number of directions, different crystal systems and fragment shapes.
For minerals with two cleavage directions, the angle between planes is often the key to identification—especially for distinguishing similar-looking minerals.
Compare: Amphibole (120°/60°) vs. pyroxene (90°) cleavage—both are dark, elongated silicates with two cleavage directions, but the angle difference is diagnostic. This is the classic mineralogy comparison question. Remember: Amphiboles have Acute and obtuse angles; Pyroxenes are Perpendicular.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Perfect cleavage quality | Mica, calcite, halite |
| Poor cleavage / fracture dominant | Quartz, olivine |
| Basal cleavage (1 direction) | Mica, graphite, topaz |
| Cubic cleavage (3 at 90°) | Halite, galena |
| Rhombohedral cleavage (3, not 90°) | Calcite, dolomite |
| Octahedral cleavage (4 directions) | Fluorite, diamond |
| Two directions at ~90° | Pyroxene (augite) |
| Two directions at ~120° | Amphibole (hornblende) |
Both calcite and halite have three cleavage directions—what geometric property distinguishes their cleavage, and how does this reflect their different crystal systems?
You're examining two dark, elongated silicate minerals in lab. What single measurement would definitively distinguish amphibole from pyroxene?
Compare and contrast mica and quartz: both are silicates, but one has perfect cleavage and one has poor cleavage. Explain how their atomic structures account for this difference.
If an FRQ asks you to explain how internal crystal structure relates to physical properties, which mineral would best demonstrate the connection between sheet silicate structure and cleavage behavior?
Fluorite and halite are both isometric minerals—why does fluorite display octahedral cleavage while halite displays cubic cleavage?