Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Memory isn't just about storing information—it's about encoding, consolidating, and retrieving it efficiently. When you're tested on learning and cognition, you need to understand the mechanisms behind why certain strategies work better than others. The techniques in this guide tap into fundamental principles like levels of processing, encoding specificity, and distributed practice—concepts that show up repeatedly in multiple-choice questions and FRQs about memory systems.
Don't just memorize a list of technique names. You're being tested on how these strategies leverage cognitive architecture: Why does spacing work better than massing? How does elaboration create stronger memory traces? What makes retrieval practice more effective than re-reading? Know what principle each technique illustrates, and you'll be ready for any question they throw at you.
These techniques work by reducing cognitive load—they transform overwhelming amounts of information into structured, meaningful units that align with how working memory actually functions.
Compare: Chunking vs. Mind Mapping—both organize information into manageable structures, but chunking works sequentially (great for lists and procedures) while mind mapping works spatially (better for showing relationships). If an FRQ asks about reducing cognitive load, chunking is your cleaner example.
The testing effect is one of the most robust findings in memory research: actively pulling information out of memory strengthens it far more than passively reviewing it.
Compare: Active Recall vs. Spaced Repetition—active recall is what you do (retrieve information), while spaced repetition is when you do it (at optimal intervals). The most powerful study strategy combines both: spaced retrieval practice. This distinction matters for FRQs asking you to design a study plan.
These techniques create richer, more interconnected memory traces through deep processing—connecting new information to what you already know.
Compare: Elaborative Rehearsal vs. Dual Coding—both create deeper encoding, but elaborative rehearsal emphasizes meaningful connections to prior knowledge while dual coding emphasizes multiple formats of representation. An FRQ might ask which is better for learning vocabulary (elaborative rehearsal) versus anatomy (dual coding).
The picture superiority effect demonstrates that visual information is remembered better than verbal information—these techniques harness that power.
Compare: Method of Loci vs. General Visualization—the method of loci is a structured visualization system using spatial memory as scaffolding, while general visualization is more flexible but less systematic. Method of loci is your go-to example for FRQs about memory techniques used by experts.
These techniques create retrieval cues by linking new information to memorable patterns, phrases, or structures.
Compare: Acronyms vs. Acrostics—acronyms work when first letters form a word (limited applicability), while acrostics work for any sequence (more flexible). Both are shallow encoding strategies—useful for rote memorization but less effective for conceptual understanding than elaborative techniques.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Reducing cognitive load | Chunking, Mind Mapping |
| Testing effect / Retrieval practice | Active Recall, Spaced Repetition |
| Levels of processing (deep encoding) | Elaborative Rehearsal, Dual Coding |
| Picture superiority / Imagery | Method of Loci, Visualization Techniques |
| Creating retrieval cues | Mnemonic Devices, Acronyms, Acrostics |
| Combating forgetting curve | Spaced Repetition, Active Recall |
| Spatial memory systems | Method of Loci, Mind Mapping |
| Multiple encoding pathways | Dual Coding, Visualization Techniques |
Which two techniques both reduce cognitive load but differ in whether they organize information sequentially or spatially?
A student re-reads their notes five times the night before an exam. Using your knowledge of memory research, identify two techniques that would be more effective and explain why each works better than re-reading.
Compare and contrast elaborative rehearsal and mnemonic devices—both aid memory, but which produces deeper understanding, and why might you choose one over the other?
An FRQ asks you to design a study plan for learning 200 vocabulary words over four weeks. Which two techniques should form the core of your plan, and how would you combine them?
A student claims the method of loci is "just visualization." How would you explain the key difference that makes the method of loci particularly powerful for ordered information?