Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Medieval music isn't just a collection of old songs—it's the story of how Western music developed its fundamental building blocks. You're being tested on understanding the evolution from monophony to polyphony, how sacred and secular traditions influenced each other, and why innovations in notation and rhythm transformed what composers could create. These genres demonstrate core principles of musical texture, compositional technique, and cultural function that appear throughout music history.
When you encounter these genres on an exam, don't just recall names and dates. Know why each genre matters: What musical problem did it solve? What cultural need did it fill? How did it build on what came before? The connections between genres—how organum grew from chant, how the motet evolved from organum—are exactly what FRQs target. Master the "why" and the facts will stick.
The earliest medieval music served the Church, and understanding Gregorian chant is essential because virtually every other medieval genre either builds on it or reacts against it. This is your baseline for the entire era.
Compare: Gregorian chant vs. Conductus—both are sacred and primarily monophonic, but conductus features structured rhythm and metrical poetry while chant flows freely with prose texts. If an FRQ asks about rhythmic development in sacred music, conductus shows the transition.
Polyphony—multiple independent melodic lines sounding together—is one of Western music's defining innovations. These genres trace how composers learned to layer voices, moving from simple parallel motion to complex independence.
Compare: Organum vs. Motet—both are polyphonic and grew from chant traditions, but the motet features multiple independent texts and greater voice independence. Organum is the "training wheels" for polyphony; the motet is the fully realized form.
Medieval music theory wasn't static—two major stylistic periods mark how composers gained control over rhythm through better notation systems.
Compare: Ars antiqua vs. Ars nova—both involve polyphony and notation development, but ars nova's rhythmic freedom and metrical flexibility represent a quantum leap. Think of it as the difference between painting by numbers (rhythmic modes) and freehand composition.
Not all medieval music served the Church. These genres show how music functioned in courts, taverns, and streets, often using vernacular languages rather than Latin.
Compare: Troubadour songs vs. Goliard songs—both are secular, but troubadour music celebrates refined courtly ideals while goliard songs embrace earthier themes of tavern life. Class and social function drive the difference.
Some genres blur the line between church and world, showing how medieval culture integrated religious and secular impulses.
Compare: Liturgical drama vs. Lauda—both bring religious content outside strict liturgical boundaries, but liturgical drama remained in churches while laude fostered community devotion in everyday settings. Both democratized sacred music in different ways.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Monophonic sacred music | Gregorian chant, Conductus |
| Early polyphony development | Organum, Motet |
| Rhythmic/notational innovation | Ars antiqua, Ars nova |
| Courtly secular tradition | Troubadour songs, Trouvère songs |
| Counter-cultural secular music | Goliard songs |
| Sacred-secular hybrids | Liturgical drama, Lauda |
| Notre Dame school | Organum, Ars antiqua (Léonin, Pérotin) |
| 14th-century innovation | Ars nova, Motet (Machaut) |
Which two genres represent the evolution from simple to complex polyphony, and what specific technique connects them?
Compare ars antiqua and ars nova: What notational limitation did ars nova overcome, and why did this matter for composers?
If an FRQ asks you to trace the development of secular music in medieval France, which genres would you discuss, and how do their themes and languages differ?
Both conductus and Gregorian chant are sacred—what rhythmic characteristic distinguishes them, and what does this reveal about changing compositional priorities?
Identify two genres that helped bridge sacred and secular traditions. How did each make religious content more accessible to ordinary people?