Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Media convergence sits at the heart of Global Media studies because it explains how and why the boundaries between once-separate media industries have dissolved. You're being tested on your ability to recognize that convergence isn't just about technologyโit's about the economic restructuring of media industries, the cultural shifts in audience behavior, and the political implications of platforms that concentrate power while appearing to democratize access. Understanding convergence means grasping concepts like technological determinism vs. social shaping, platform capitalism, participatory culture, and the attention economy.
Don't just memorize a list of converged technologies. Know what each example illustrates about broader media transformations: Does it show horizontal integration (one company controlling multiple platforms)? Does it demonstrate audience fragmentation or aggregation? Does it raise questions about surveillance, labor, or cultural homogenization? When you can connect a smartphone to debates about digital labor and a streaming service to discussions of cultural imperialism, you're thinking like a media scholarโand that's exactly what FRQs demand.
These technologies collapse multiple media functions into single hardware, fundamentally changing how users access and interact with content. The convergence happens at the point of consumption, concentrating media power in fewer physical objects while expanding the range of possible uses.
Compare: Smartphones vs. Smart TVsโboth integrate internet connectivity with traditional media functions, but smartphones emphasize mobility and personal use while smart TVs maintain the communal, domestic viewing experience. If an FRQ asks about convergence's impact on public vs. private media consumption, contrast these two.
Platforms merge content creation, distribution, and consumption into unified digital spaces. These examples demonstrate how convergence restructures media industries by creating new intermediaries that control access between creators and audiences.
Compare: Social Media Platforms vs. Digital News Platformsโboth distribute news content, but social media relies on peer sharing and algorithmic amplification while digital news platforms maintain editorial control. This distinction matters for FRQs about journalistic authority and misinformation.
These examples show how convergence transforms the form of media itself, blending genres, formats, and storytelling techniques. The boundaries between entertainment, information, and communication become increasingly fluid.
Compare: Multimedia Journalism vs. Cross-Platform Gamingโboth require users to engage across multiple formats, but journalism aims for information delivery while gaming prioritizes entertainment and social connection. Both illustrate how convergence demands new digital literacies from audiences.
These technologies provide the underlying systems that make other forms of convergence possible. They represent convergence at the structural level, reshaping how media is stored, processed, and distributed.
Compare: Cloud Computing vs. IoTโcloud computing centralizes media infrastructure in data centers while IoT distributes connectivity across countless devices. Together, they illustrate how convergence operates at both macro (industry) and micro (household) levels.
These technologies merge digital and physical realities, creating new possibilities for immersion and interaction. They represent the frontier of convergence, where media environments become spatial rather than screen-based.
Compare: Virtual Reality vs. Augmented RealityโVR creates fully immersive digital environments while AR overlays digital content onto physical spaces. VR isolates users from their surroundings; AR integrates media into everyday life. Both raise questions about mediated reality and embodied experience.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Technological convergence | Smartphones, Smart TVs, IoT |
| Platform capitalism | Social Media Platforms, Streaming Services |
| Participatory culture | Smartphones, Social Media Platforms, Cross-Platform Gaming |
| Vertical integration | Streaming Services, Cloud Computing |
| Attention economy | Smartphones, Social Media Platforms |
| Surveillance/privacy concerns | IoT, Social Media Platforms, Cloud Computing |
| Media labor transformation | Multimedia Journalism, Cloud Computing |
| Immersive/spatial media | Virtual and Augmented Reality |
Which two examples best illustrate the tension between democratized content creation and concentrated platform power? Explain how each demonstrates this contradiction.
Compare and contrast how streaming services and social media platforms have disrupted traditional media gatekeeping. What different challenges does each pose for legacy media industries?
If an FRQ asks you to analyze how convergence affects privacy and surveillance, which three examples would you choose, and what specific concerns does each raise?
How do smartphones and IoT devices together illustrate the concept of an "always-on" media environment? What are the cultural and political implications of this constant connectivity?
Explain how multimedia journalism and virtual/augmented reality both require new forms of media literacy from audiences. What skills must users develop to engage critically with each?