Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Marine pollution isn't just about trash floating in the ocean—it's a complex web of chemical, physical, and biological stressors that fundamentally alter how marine ecosystems function. You're being tested on your understanding of bioaccumulation, eutrophication, habitat degradation, and trophic cascade effects. Each pollution source demonstrates different pathways by which human activities disrupt ocean chemistry, species behavior, and ecosystem stability.
When you encounter these topics on exams, you'll need to explain mechanisms of harm, not just identify pollutants. Why does nutrient pollution create dead zones? How does plastic affect organisms differently at various trophic levels? Don't just memorize a list of pollution types—know what ecological principle each one illustrates and how they interact to compound environmental damage.
These pollutants introduce harmful substances that persist in marine environments and concentrate as they move up the food chain. The key mechanism here is bioaccumulation and biomagnification—toxins become more concentrated at higher trophic levels.
Compare: Industrial effluents vs. agricultural runoff—both cause bioaccumulation, but industrial sources introduce persistent synthetic toxins while agricultural sources primarily drive nutrient pollution and eutrophication. FRQs often ask you to trace different pollutant pathways through food webs.
Excess nutrients fundamentally alter primary productivity and oxygen dynamics. Eutrophication—the over-enrichment of water bodies—creates a cascade of effects that can collapse entire ecosystems.
Compare: Sewage vs. atmospheric deposition—both contribute to eutrophication, but sewage creates localized point-source pollution while atmospheric deposition represents diffuse, global-scale contamination. This distinction matters when discussing pollution management strategies.
These pollutants cause direct physical harm through ingestion, entanglement, and habitat smothering. Unlike chemical pollutants, physical debris creates immediate mechanical damage while also serving as vectors for chemical contamination.
Compare: Plastic pollution vs. oil spills—plastics cause chronic, persistent harm across size classes while oil spills create acute, localized disasters with intense immediate mortality. Both affect the same species differently: seabirds die from oil coating but from plastic ingestion.
These pollutants alter the physical environment without introducing foreign materials. Thermal and acoustic energy changes can be just as devastating as chemical contamination, particularly for sensitive species.
Compare: Thermal vs. noise pollution—both are energy-based rather than material pollutants, but thermal pollution primarily affects sessile organisms and temperature-sensitive species while noise pollution disproportionately impacts acoustically-dependent marine mammals. Neither leaves visible traces, making them easy to overlook on exams.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Bioaccumulation/Biomagnification | Industrial effluents, radioactive waste, plastic chemical leaching |
| Eutrophication & Dead Zones | Agricultural runoff, sewage and wastewater |
| Direct Physical Harm | Plastic pollution, marine debris, oil spills |
| Ocean Acidification | Atmospheric deposition ( absorption) |
| Thermal Stress | Thermal pollution, climate-driven warming |
| Behavioral Disruption | Noise pollution, thermal pollution |
| Point vs. Non-point Sources | Sewage (point) vs. agricultural runoff (non-point) |
| Persistence in Environment | Plastic pollution, radioactive waste, heavy metals |
Which two pollution sources both contribute to eutrophication but differ in whether they're classified as point or non-point sources? Explain the management implications of this difference.
Compare and contrast how plastic pollution and oil spills affect seabirds—what mechanisms of harm does each represent?
A marine mammal population shows declining reproduction rates and increased stress hormones. Which pollution sources could explain these symptoms, and what evidence would help you distinguish between them?
If an FRQ asks you to trace mercury from its emission source to a human consumer, which pollution pathway would you describe? Include at least three trophic levels.
Why might thermal pollution and noise pollution be considered "invisible" threats, and what makes them particularly challenging to regulate compared to chemical contamination?