Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Charles Dickens isn't just a name you'll encounter on your British Literature II exam—he's the writer who essentially invented the social novel and shaped how we think about Victorian England. When you're tested on Dickens, you're being tested on your understanding of serialized fiction, social reform literature, bildungsroman structure, and the relationship between literature and historical context. His works demonstrate how novelists used fiction as a vehicle for exposing institutional failures, from workhouses to debtors' prisons to the legal system itself.
The key to mastering Dickens is understanding his methods, not just his plots. Each novel deploys specific literary techniques—unreliable narrators, symbolic settings, caricatured villains, redemption arcs—to critique particular aspects of Victorian society. Don't just memorize that Oliver Twist is about an orphan; know that it's Dickens's attack on the Poor Law system and his use of the innocent child as moral compass. That's what FRQs will ask you to analyze.
Dickens wielded fiction as a weapon against Victorian institutions. These novels target specific systems—workhouses, factories, courts—exposing how bureaucracy and greed crush individual lives.
Compare: Oliver Twist vs. Hard Times—both attack systems that harm the vulnerable, but Oliver targets governmental poor relief while Hard Times targets industrial capitalism and educational philosophy. If an FRQ asks about Dickens's evolving social critique, trace this shift from institutional to ideological targets.
Dickens mastered the coming-of-age narrative, using individual growth to explore class mobility, identity formation, and moral education. These novels follow protagonists from childhood through maturity, with society itself as antagonist.
Compare: David Copperfield vs. Great Expectations—both are first-person bildungsromans featuring orphaned protagonists, but David ultimately achieves conventional success while Pip must abandon his expectations. Copperfield is warmer and more autobiographical; Expectations is darker and more critical of class aspiration.
Dickens occasionally stepped outside contemporary England to examine how historical upheaval shapes individual fate. These works use the past to comment on present anxieties about social instability.
Compare: A Tale of Two Cities vs. Bleak House—both feature complex plots with mysteries of identity, but Tale uses historical revolution while Bleak House depicts the slow violence of legal bureaucracy. Tale is Dickens at his most romantic; Bleak House at his most systemic.
Some of Dickens's most enduring works center on characters who undergo profound moral change. These narratives argue that personal transformation remains possible regardless of age or circumstance.
Compare: A Christmas Carol vs. Little Dorrit—both feature characters trapped by money (Scrooge by hoarding, the Dorrits by debt), but Carol offers swift supernatural redemption while Little Dorrit depicts the slow, grinding work of maintaining virtue in a corrupt system.
Dickens began his career as a comic writer, and humor remained central to his method even in his darkest works. These early novels establish his gift for caricature, episodic plotting, and satirical observation.
Compare: The Pickwick Papers vs. Nicholas Nickleby—both feature episodic adventures and comic set pieces, but Nickleby integrates darker social critique (Dotheboys Hall) while Pickwick remains largely sunny. Trace Dickens's development from pure comedy to comedy-with-purpose.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Institutional critique | Oliver Twist, Bleak House, Little Dorrit |
| Bildungsroman structure | David Copperfield, Great Expectations, Nicholas Nickleby |
| Industrial/utilitarian critique | Hard Times |
| Historical fiction | A Tale of Two Cities |
| Redemption narrative | A Christmas Carol, Great Expectations |
| Serial publication origins | The Pickwick Papers, Oliver Twist |
| Autobiographical elements | David Copperfield, Little Dorrit |
| Dual/innovative narration | Bleak House, Great Expectations |
Which two novels most directly critique Victorian institutions (one governmental, one legal), and how do their methods of critique differ?
Both David Copperfield and Great Expectations are first-person bildungsromans—what distinguishes their attitudes toward class mobility and success?
Identify the novel that best exemplifies each: (a) attack on utilitarian philosophy, (b) use of historical setting, (c) dual narration technique.
Compare and contrast how A Christmas Carol and Little Dorrit treat the theme of imprisonment—one literal, one metaphorical. How does each suggest escape is possible?
If an FRQ asked you to discuss how Dickens uses child protagonists to critique adult institutions, which three novels would provide your strongest evidence, and what specific institutions does each target?