Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
The Major Prophets represent far more than ancient voices—they're the theological architects of concepts you'll encounter throughout Western religious thought. When you study these figures, you're tracing the origins of ideas like messianic expectation, covenant theology, individual moral responsibility, and apocalyptic literature. These concepts don't stay contained in Judaism; they flow directly into Christian theology and shape how billions of people understand God's relationship with humanity.
You're being tested on your ability to connect prophetic messages to their historical contexts and to recognize how different prophets addressed similar crises in distinct ways. Don't just memorize names and dates—know what theological innovation each prophet introduced and why their message mattered during Israel's most turbulent periods. The exam will ask you to compare prophetic responses to exile, destruction, and hope.
These prophets emerged during times of national crisis, delivering urgent messages about the consequences of covenant unfaithfulness. Their role was to interpret current events through a theological lens, explaining why disaster was coming and what it meant about Israel's relationship with God.
Compare: Isaiah vs. Jeremiah—both warned of judgment, but Isaiah balanced doom with messianic hope while Jeremiah focused on the immediate crisis and emotional weight of destruction. If an FRQ asks about prophetic responses to national sin, these two offer contrasting tones with similar theological foundations.
Writing during or after the Babylonian exile (586 BCE), these prophets addressed a community that had lost everything—land, temple, monarchy. Their task was to explain how faith could survive catastrophe and what hope remained.
Compare: Ezekiel vs. Daniel—both address exile, but Ezekiel focuses on explaining why it happened and how restoration will occur, while Daniel focuses on how to survive exile faithfully and when God's kingdom will triumph. Ezekiel is pastoral; Daniel is apocalyptic.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Messianic expectation | Isaiah (suffering servant, Prince of Peace) |
| Covenant theology | Jeremiah (new covenant), Ezekiel (restored relationship) |
| Social justice emphasis | Isaiah, Jeremiah |
| Individual responsibility | Ezekiel 18 |
| Apocalyptic literature | Daniel (visions of beasts and kingdoms) |
| Exile theology | Ezekiel (why exile happened), Daniel (how to survive it) |
| Temple themes | Ezekiel (future temple vision), Jeremiah (temple critique) |
| Faithful resistance | Daniel (lion's den, fiery furnace) |
Which two prophets most directly address the question of why Israel experienced exile, and how do their explanations differ in emphasis?
Compare the "new covenant" in Jeremiah with Ezekiel's vision of restoration—what shift in the God-human relationship does each prophet anticipate?
If an FRQ asked you to trace the origins of apocalyptic literature in Judaism, which prophet would you focus on and what specific elements would you cite?
How does Ezekiel's emphasis on individual responsibility challenge earlier Israelite thinking about collective guilt and punishment?
Both Isaiah and Daniel influenced Christian theology significantly—identify one key concept from each prophet that Christianity later reinterpreted, and explain the original Jewish context.