Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Public relations campaigns represent the strategic intersection of brand messaging, audience psychology, and media channel selection—core concepts you'll be tested on throughout this course. These campaigns don't just sell products; they demonstrate how organizations shape public perception, manage reputation, and create cultural movements. Understanding why certain campaigns succeeded (or struggled) reveals the underlying principles of agenda-setting, framing, two-way communication, and integrated marketing communications.
When you study these campaigns, you're building a toolkit for analyzing any PR strategy. Don't just memorize which brand launched which slogan—know what communication principle each campaign illustrates. Can you explain why emotional storytelling works differently than humor? Why user-generated content creates engagement that traditional advertising can't? These are the questions that separate surface-level recall from the conceptual understanding exams demand.
The most enduring campaigns often strip messaging down to a core idea that becomes inseparable from the brand itself. This approach leverages cognitive ease—simple, repeated messages create stronger memory associations and brand recall.
Compare: "Think Small" vs. "Get a Mac"—both used humor and simplicity to position against dominant competitors, but Volkswagen targeted cultural values while Apple targeted functional frustrations. If an FRQ asks about challenger brand positioning, either works as an example.
Some campaigns succeed by connecting products to deeper human experiences and social values. This approach activates emotional processing, which research shows creates stronger brand loyalty than rational appeals alone.
Compare: Dove's "Real Beauty" vs. P&G's "Thank You, Mom"—both use emotional appeals, but Dove challenged existing norms (disruptive positioning) while P&G reinforced universal values (affirmational positioning). Know the difference for questions about brand risk tolerance.
Modern PR increasingly relies on audiences to co-create and distribute content. Two-way symmetric communication—where organizations and publics influence each other—represents the ideal in contemporary PR theory.
Compare: "Share a Coke" vs. Ice Bucket Challenge—both relied on user participation, but Coca-Cola initiated and controlled the campaign while ALS went viral organically. This distinction matters for questions about owned vs. earned media strategy.
Brands increasingly position themselves as forces for social good, though execution determines success. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) campaigns work when authenticity aligns with brand identity—and fail when they appear opportunistic.
Compare: Pepsi's "Refresh Project" vs. "Got Milk?"—both attempted to build goodwill beyond direct product promotion, but "Got Milk?" succeeded through consistent execution over decades while Pepsi's short-term commitment undermined credibility. Use this contrast for questions about campaign sustainability.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Simple, memorable messaging | Nike "Just Do It," VW "Think Small," "Got Milk?" |
| Emotional/values-based appeals | Dove "Real Beauty," P&G "Thank You, Mom" |
| User-generated content | Coca-Cola "Share a Coke," ALS Ice Bucket Challenge |
| Humor as persuasion | Old Spice, Apple "Get a Mac," VW "Think Small" |
| Comparative positioning | Apple "Get a Mac," VW "Think Small" |
| Real-time engagement | Old Spice social media responses |
| Cause marketing/CSR | Dove "Real Beauty," ALS Ice Bucket Challenge, Pepsi "Refresh" |
| Viral/earned media | ALS Ice Bucket Challenge, Old Spice |
Which two campaigns used humor and simplicity to position against dominant competitors, and how did their target audiences differ?
Compare the user engagement strategies of Coca-Cola's "Share a Coke" and the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge. Which relied more heavily on earned vs. owned media?
If an FRQ asked you to analyze a failed CSR campaign, which example would you use and what strategic mistakes would you identify?
Both Dove's "Real Beauty" and P&G's "Thank You, Mom" use emotional appeals. How do their approaches to social values differ in terms of brand risk?
Explain how Old Spice's campaign demonstrated the shift from one-way to two-way communication in modern PR. What specific tactic made this possible?