upgrade
upgrade

⚔️Early Modern Europe – 1450 to 1750

Major Philosophers of the Enlightenment

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

The Enlightenment wasn't just a collection of smart people writing books—it was a fundamental rewiring of how Europeans thought about power, knowledge, and human nature. When you're tested on this period, you're being asked to demonstrate how philosophical ideas translated into political revolutions, economic systems, and social reforms that shaped the modern world. The connections matter: Locke's natural rights show up in the Declaration of Independence, Montesquieu's separation of powers structures the U.S. Constitution, and Smith's economic theories still fuel debates today.

Don't fall into the trap of memorizing philosopher-to-idea pairs in isolation. The real exam payoff comes from understanding how these thinkers built on, contradicted, or refined each other's arguments. Were humans naturally good or selfish? Should government be strong or limited? Is reason alone sufficient, or do emotions matter? These debates defined the Enlightenment and continue to echo through modern political discourse. Know the tensions between these philosophers, not just their individual contributions.


Political Theory and the Social Contract

The question of government legitimacy obsessed Enlightenment thinkers. If kings didn't rule by divine right, where did political authority come from? The answer—the consent of the governed through a social contract—revolutionized political thought, though philosophers disagreed sharply on what that contract should look like.

Thomas Hobbes

  • Argued human nature is fundamentally self-interested and competitive—without government, life would be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short"
  • Advocated for absolute sovereignty in Leviathan, reasoning that only a powerful central authority could prevent societal chaos
  • Pioneered secular political philosophy—grounded government legitimacy in rational self-interest rather than divine mandate

John Locke

  • Defined natural rights as life, liberty, and property—rights that exist before government and cannot be legitimately violated by it
  • Proposed government as a limited contract where rulers derive authority from the consent of the governed and can be overthrown if they violate natural rights
  • Championed empiricism—the idea that knowledge comes from sensory experience, not innate ideas, influencing both philosophy and education

Jean-Jacques Rousseau

  • Introduced the "general will" as the basis for legitimate government—collective decision-making that prioritizes the common good over individual interests
  • Critiqued civilization itself as corrupting humanity's natural goodness, arguing that inequality and private property degraded human nature
  • Influenced revolutionary thought—his ideas about popular sovereignty directly shaped French Revolutionary ideology

Compare: Hobbes vs. Locke—both used social contract theory, but Hobbes concluded humans need strong authoritarian control while Locke argued for limited government protecting natural rights. If an FRQ asks about Enlightenment influences on revolution, Locke is your go-to; for debates about state power, contrast both.


Government Structure and Reform

Beyond abstract theory, some philosophers focused on how governments should actually be organized. These thinkers analyzed existing systems and proposed structural reforms to prevent tyranny—ideas that directly shaped constitutional design.

Montesquieu

  • Developed the separation of powers doctrine—dividing government into executive, legislative, and judicial branches to prevent any single entity from becoming tyrannical
  • Analyzed comparative political systems in The Spirit of the Laws, examining how climate, culture, and geography shape effective governance
  • Directly influenced constitutional framers—his ideas appear explicitly in the U.S. Constitution's structure and the Federalist Papers

Voltaire

  • Championed freedom of speech and religious tolerance—famously (if apocryphally) declaring he'd defend others' right to speak even while disagreeing with them
  • Used satire as a weapon against religious dogma, superstition, and political abuse in works like Candide
  • Advocated for civil liberties and church-state separation—though he favored enlightened monarchy over democracy

Compare: Montesquieu vs. Voltaire—both sought to limit abuses of power, but Montesquieu focused on structural solutions (separating branches) while Voltaire emphasized cultural changes (tolerance, free expression). Both approaches influenced revolutionary constitutions.


Epistemology: How Do We Know What We Know?

Enlightenment thinkers didn't just debate politics—they questioned the foundations of knowledge itself. This epistemological revolution challenged religious authority and established reason and observation as the paths to truth, though philosophers disagreed on the limits of human understanding.

David Hume

  • Challenged the reliability of pure reason—argued that emotions and habits, not logic alone, drive human behavior and belief
  • Promoted radical empiricism—rejected innate ideas entirely, insisting all knowledge derives from sensory experience
  • Applied skepticism to religion—questioned miracles, causation, and traditional proofs of God's existence, influencing secular thought

Immanuel Kant

  • Synthesized rationalism and empiricism—argued that while knowledge begins with experience, the mind actively structures that experience through innate categories
  • Developed the categorical imperative—a universal moral law stating you should act only according to principles you'd want to become universal rules
  • Defined Enlightenment itself as humanity's emergence from self-imposed immaturity, captured in his motto: "Dare to know!"

Baruch Spinoza

  • Proposed pantheism—equating God with nature itself, rejecting the personal, interventionist God of traditional religion
  • Championed pure rationalism—believed understanding the universe through reason was the highest human achievement
  • Defended freedom of thought against religious and political censorship, making him a hero to later Enlightenment figures despite his controversial reputation

Compare: Hume vs. Kant—Hume's skepticism about reason's power "woke Kant from his dogmatic slumber," prompting Kant to develop his synthesis. Understanding this intellectual dialogue shows sophisticated grasp of Enlightenment development.


Knowledge Dissemination and Public Discourse

Ideas only matter if they spread. Some Enlightenment figures focused on making knowledge accessible to broader audiences, challenging the monopoly of church and university on intellectual life.

Denis Diderot

  • Co-edited the Encyclopédie—a massive 28-volume compilation aiming to systematize all human knowledge and make it publicly accessible
  • Promoted secularism and rational inquiry—the Encyclopédie subtly undermined religious authority by treating all subjects through empirical analysis
  • Faced censorship and persecution—the project was banned multiple times, demonstrating how threatening accessible knowledge was to established powers

Compare: Diderot vs. Voltaire—both challenged religious authority, but Diderot worked through systematic knowledge compilation while Voltaire wielded satirical wit. The Encyclopédie was a collaborative, institutional project; Voltaire was a one-man publicity machine.


Economic Theory

The Enlightenment extended rational analysis to economic life, challenging mercantilist assumptions about wealth and government's role in markets.

Adam Smith

  • Introduced the "invisible hand" metaphor—arguing that individuals pursuing self-interest unintentionally benefit society through market mechanisms
  • Advocated laissez-faire economics—minimal government intervention allows markets to self-regulate and maximize prosperity
  • Emphasized division of labor in The Wealth of Nations—specialization dramatically increases productivity, explaining industrial economic growth

Compare: Smith vs. Hobbes—both saw humans as self-interested, but drew opposite conclusions. Hobbes thought self-interest required strong government control; Smith argued self-interest, channeled through markets, produces social good without government direction.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Social Contract TheoryHobbes, Locke, Rousseau
Natural RightsLocke
Separation of PowersMontesquieu
Religious Tolerance/CriticismVoltaire, Hume, Spinoza
EmpiricismLocke, Hume
RationalismKant, Spinoza
Free Market EconomicsSmith
Knowledge DisseminationDiderot
Popular SovereigntyRousseau
Moral PhilosophyKant (categorical imperative)

Self-Check Questions

  1. Both Hobbes and Locke used social contract theory—what fundamentally different conclusions did they reach about government, and why?

  2. Which philosopher's ideas most directly influenced the structure of the U.S. Constitution, and what specific concept did he contribute?

  3. Compare Hume's and Kant's views on human reason: how did Hume's skepticism shape Kant's philosophical project?

  4. If an FRQ asked you to explain Enlightenment challenges to religious authority, which three philosophers would provide the strongest examples, and what specific arguments would you cite?

  5. How do Rousseau's ideas about human nature and civilization differ from both Hobbes and Locke, and why did his philosophy appeal to French revolutionaries?