Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
The Enlightenment wasn't just a collection of smart people writing books—it was a fundamental rewiring of how Europeans thought about power, knowledge, and human nature. When you're tested on this period, you're being asked to demonstrate how philosophical ideas translated into political revolutions, economic systems, and social reforms that shaped the modern world. The connections matter: Locke's natural rights show up in the Declaration of Independence, Montesquieu's separation of powers structures the U.S. Constitution, and Smith's economic theories still fuel debates today.
Don't fall into the trap of memorizing philosopher-to-idea pairs in isolation. The real exam payoff comes from understanding how these thinkers built on, contradicted, or refined each other's arguments. Were humans naturally good or selfish? Should government be strong or limited? Is reason alone sufficient, or do emotions matter? These debates defined the Enlightenment and continue to echo through modern political discourse. Know the tensions between these philosophers, not just their individual contributions.
The question of government legitimacy obsessed Enlightenment thinkers. If kings didn't rule by divine right, where did political authority come from? The answer—the consent of the governed through a social contract—revolutionized political thought, though philosophers disagreed sharply on what that contract should look like.
Compare: Hobbes vs. Locke—both used social contract theory, but Hobbes concluded humans need strong authoritarian control while Locke argued for limited government protecting natural rights. If an FRQ asks about Enlightenment influences on revolution, Locke is your go-to; for debates about state power, contrast both.
Beyond abstract theory, some philosophers focused on how governments should actually be organized. These thinkers analyzed existing systems and proposed structural reforms to prevent tyranny—ideas that directly shaped constitutional design.
Compare: Montesquieu vs. Voltaire—both sought to limit abuses of power, but Montesquieu focused on structural solutions (separating branches) while Voltaire emphasized cultural changes (tolerance, free expression). Both approaches influenced revolutionary constitutions.
Enlightenment thinkers didn't just debate politics—they questioned the foundations of knowledge itself. This epistemological revolution challenged religious authority and established reason and observation as the paths to truth, though philosophers disagreed on the limits of human understanding.
Compare: Hume vs. Kant—Hume's skepticism about reason's power "woke Kant from his dogmatic slumber," prompting Kant to develop his synthesis. Understanding this intellectual dialogue shows sophisticated grasp of Enlightenment development.
Ideas only matter if they spread. Some Enlightenment figures focused on making knowledge accessible to broader audiences, challenging the monopoly of church and university on intellectual life.
Compare: Diderot vs. Voltaire—both challenged religious authority, but Diderot worked through systematic knowledge compilation while Voltaire wielded satirical wit. The Encyclopédie was a collaborative, institutional project; Voltaire was a one-man publicity machine.
The Enlightenment extended rational analysis to economic life, challenging mercantilist assumptions about wealth and government's role in markets.
Compare: Smith vs. Hobbes—both saw humans as self-interested, but drew opposite conclusions. Hobbes thought self-interest required strong government control; Smith argued self-interest, channeled through markets, produces social good without government direction.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Social Contract Theory | Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau |
| Natural Rights | Locke |
| Separation of Powers | Montesquieu |
| Religious Tolerance/Criticism | Voltaire, Hume, Spinoza |
| Empiricism | Locke, Hume |
| Rationalism | Kant, Spinoza |
| Free Market Economics | Smith |
| Knowledge Dissemination | Diderot |
| Popular Sovereignty | Rousseau |
| Moral Philosophy | Kant (categorical imperative) |
Both Hobbes and Locke used social contract theory—what fundamentally different conclusions did they reach about government, and why?
Which philosopher's ideas most directly influenced the structure of the U.S. Constitution, and what specific concept did he contribute?
Compare Hume's and Kant's views on human reason: how did Hume's skepticism shape Kant's philosophical project?
If an FRQ asked you to explain Enlightenment challenges to religious authority, which three philosophers would provide the strongest examples, and what specific arguments would you cite?
How do Rousseau's ideas about human nature and civilization differ from both Hobbes and Locke, and why did his philosophy appeal to French revolutionaries?