Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
The Neolithic Revolution wasn't just about farming—it fundamentally rewired human society. When you study these settlements, you're being tested on your understanding of sedentism, social stratification, surplus production, and the emergence of specialized labor. These sites demonstrate how the shift from foraging to food production created the conditions for everything that followed: cities, writing, organized religion, and political hierarchies.
Don't just memorize dates and locations. Each settlement illustrates a specific concept about how human societies transformed. Ask yourself: What does this site reveal about the relationship between food production, population density, and social complexity? That's the thinking that earns you points on FRQs.
Some sites suggest that complex social organization and monumental construction may have preceded widespread agriculture—flipping the traditional "farming leads to civilization" model on its head.
The construction of walls and towers indicates not just architectural skill, but social organization capable of mobilizing labor for collective defense—a hallmark of emerging political authority.
Compare: Jericho vs. Göbekli Tepe—both date to the early Neolithic, but Jericho shows defensive monumentality while Göbekli Tepe shows ritual monumentality. If an FRQ asks about the origins of social complexity, these two sites offer contrasting pathways.
High population density required new forms of social regulation—shared walls, communal spaces, and standardized housing reflect emerging norms for living together at scale.
Compare: Çatalhöyük vs. Banpo—both show communal living patterns, but Çatalhöyük's roofless-entry design contrasts sharply with Banpo's open circular layout. This illustrates how different environments and cultural traditions produced distinct solutions to the same challenge of dense settlement.
These sites document the actual process of domestication—the genetic and behavioral changes in plants and animals that made surplus production possible.
Compare: Mehrgarh vs. Jarmo—both are early agricultural sites, but Mehrgarh developed independently in South Asia while Jarmo sits within the Fertile Crescent diffusion zone. This distinction matters for understanding whether agriculture spread from one center or emerged multiple times.
Not all Neolithic settlements developed in fertile river valleys—some communities adapted agricultural and pastoral strategies to challenging landscapes.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Pre-agricultural monumentality | Göbekli Tepe |
| Defensive architecture | Jericho, Tell es-Sultan |
| Dense communal living | Çatalhöyük, Banpo, Ain Ghazal |
| Independent domestication centers | Mehrgarh (South Asia), Banpo (East Asia) |
| Fertile Crescent diffusion | Jarmo, Çayönü, Jericho |
| Craft specialization and trade | Mehrgarh, Çatalhöyük |
| Environmental adaptation | Skara Brae |
| Ritual and ancestor veneration | Göbekli Tepe, Ain Ghazal, Çatalhöyük |
Which two sites challenge the traditional narrative that agriculture preceded complex social organization, and what evidence supports this challenge?
Compare the architectural layouts of Çatalhöyük and Banpo. What do their differences suggest about regional variation in Neolithic social organization?
If an FRQ asked you to discuss independent centers of agricultural development, which sites would you use as evidence for regions outside the Fertile Crescent?
How do the burial practices at Çatalhöyük and the statues at Ain Ghazal both reflect the importance of ancestor veneration in Neolithic communities?
Contrast the environmental challenges faced by settlers at Skara Brae versus Jericho. How did each community adapt their subsistence strategies to their specific landscape?