Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
New Mexico's identity has been fundamentally shaped by what lies beneath and above its land. From the uranium that fueled Cold War nuclear programs to the oil fields that now fund public education, you're being tested on how resource extraction drives economic development, creates human-environment conflicts, and forces communities to balance prosperity against sustainability. These resources don't exist in isolation—they connect to broader themes of federal-state relations, Indigenous land rights, boom-and-bust economic cycles, and environmental justice.
As you study these resources, don't just memorize what's mined where. Know what each resource illustrates about New Mexico's historical development: Which resources created dependency on federal policy? Which ones sparked environmental justice movements? Which are reshaping the state's economic future? Understanding the why behind resource development will serve you far better on exams than a list of facts ever could.
New Mexico's fossil fuel industry demonstrates the classic tension between economic dependence and environmental cost. These resources have funded schools, created jobs, and tied the state's fortunes to volatile global markets—a pattern you'll see repeated throughout Western resource history.
Compare: Oil/gas vs. coal—both fossil fuels driving state revenue, but oil remains economically dominant while coal faces terminal decline. If asked about energy transitions in New Mexico, coal's story is your clearest example of how market forces and environmental policy reshape regional economies.
New Mexico's mineral wealth tied the state directly to federal defense priorities, particularly during the Cold War. These resources illustrate how national security interests can transform—and sometimes devastate—local communities.
Compare: Uranium vs. copper—both created mining communities and environmental legacies, but uranium's story is uniquely tied to federal Cold War policy and Indigenous health impacts. Use uranium as your primary example when discussing federal influence on state development or environmental justice.
In an arid state, water is the resource that constrains all others. Every agricultural, industrial, and urban development decision in New Mexico ultimately comes back to water availability—making this the essential context for understanding the state's resource history.
Compare: Surface water (Rio Grande) vs. groundwater (aquifers)—rivers are governed by interstate compacts and visible to all users, while aquifers are "invisible" and easier to overexploit without immediate consequences. This distinction matters for understanding why groundwater depletion often goes unaddressed until crisis hits.
New Mexico's abundant sunshine and wind position it for leadership in the energy transition—but realizing this potential requires navigating the same economic and political tensions that have always shaped resource development here.
Compare: Solar vs. wind—both renewables offering economic diversification, but solar benefits from more widespread suitable locations while wind development concentrates in specific geographic corridors. Together they illustrate how New Mexico might transition from extraction-based to generation-based energy economy.
New Mexico's mountain forests provide resources beyond timber, including watershed protection, recreation, and wildlife habitat. Managing these forests connects directly to the state's water security and wildfire challenges.
Compare: Timber vs. water resources—forests and water are deeply interconnected in New Mexico. Degraded forests mean degraded watersheds, making forest management a water policy issue as much as a timber industry concern.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Fossil fuel economic dependence | Oil/gas (Permian Basin), Coal (San Juan Basin) |
| Federal policy shaping state development | Uranium (Cold War demand), Coal (Navajo Nation leases) |
| Environmental justice concerns | Uranium (Navajo miners), Copper (water depletion) |
| Water as limiting factor | Rio Grande, Ogallala Aquifer, Agricultural land |
| Energy transition dynamics | Coal decline, Solar potential, Wind development |
| Boom-and-bust cycles | Oil/gas prices, Uranium (Cold War to bust), Copper markets |
| Interstate/international resource conflicts | Rio Grande compacts, Ogallala Aquifer depletion |
| Renewable diversification strategy | Solar, Wind |
Which two resources best illustrate how federal policy decisions shaped New Mexico's economic development, and what role did the federal government play in each case?
Compare the environmental justice issues associated with uranium mining and coal mining—what communities were most affected, and how do the ongoing consequences differ?
If asked to explain why water scarcity constrains New Mexico's development options, which three resources would you connect to water availability, and how?
How do solar and wind energy represent a potential solution to the boom-and-bust economic cycles that have historically characterized New Mexico's resource economy?
Compare and contrast the Permian Basin's role in oil/gas production versus potash production—what does this geographic overlap suggest about resource concentration and regional economic dependence?