Major Nationalist Revolutions

Why This Matters

Nationalist revolutions are central to understanding how the modern world of nation-states emerged from empires, colonies, and monarchies. When you study these movements, you're being tested on more than dates and leaders—you need to grasp the underlying forces that drove people to risk everything for self-determination. These revolutions demonstrate key concepts like popular sovereignty, ethnic and civic nationalism, the spread of Enlightenment ideals, and the tension between liberal and conservative forces in shaping political boundaries.

Each revolution on this list illustrates a different pathway to nationhood, and AP exams love to ask you to compare them. Why did some succeed quickly while others took decades? How did geography, social structure, and international support shape outcomes? Don't just memorize which revolution happened when—know what type of nationalism each represents and what mechanisms allowed movements to succeed or fail.

---

Enlightenment-Driven Revolutions

These revolutions drew directly from Enlightenment philosophy, emphasizing natural rights, popular sovereignty, and the social contract. They challenged the legitimacy of monarchical and colonial rule through intellectual arguments as much as military force.

American Revolution (1765–1783)

• "No taxation without representation" became the rallying cry—colonists rejected Parliament's authority to govern without colonial consent
• Popular sovereignty replaced divine right as the basis for government legitimacy, codified in the Declaration of Independence
• Inspired global movements by proving that colonies could successfully break from European powers through organized resistance

French Revolution (1789–1799)

• Overthrew absolute monarchy and established the principle that sovereignty resided in the nation, not the king
• Radical phases demonstrated how revolutions can spiral—from constitutional monarchy to republic to Terror to Napoleon
• Spread nationalist ideology across Europe through both revolutionary wars and the Napoleonic Code's emphasis on citizenship

---

Anti-Colonial Liberation Movements

These revolutions challenged European imperial control, often combining Enlightenment rhetoric with local grievances about economic exploitation, racial hierarchy, and cultural suppression. They proved that colonized peoples could successfully claim the same rights Europeans demanded for themselves.

Haitian Revolution (1791–1804)

• First successful slave revolution in history—enslaved people defeated French, Spanish, and British forces to establish independence
• Toussaint Louverture emerged as a brilliant military and political leader before Napoleon's forces captured him
• Terrified slaveholding societies worldwide, leading the U.S. to refuse recognition and France to demand crippling indemnity payments

Latin American Wars of Independence (1808–1833)

• Creole elites (American-born Europeans) led most movements, seeking political power denied them under Spanish colonial hierarchy
• Simón Bolívar and José de San Martín became iconic liberators, though their visions of unified Latin America ultimately fragmented
• Napoleon's invasion of Spain created the power vacuum that made independence possible—colonial legitimacy collapsed when the mother country fell

Irish War of Independence (1919–1921)

• Guerrilla warfare tactics pioneered by Michael Collins influenced anti-colonial movements throughout the 20th century
• Easter Rising of 1916 failed militarily but succeeded politically by radicalizing Irish opinion against British rule
• Partition resulted in the Irish Free State and Northern Ireland—demonstrating how nationalist movements can achieve partial victories with lasting tensions

---

European Ethnic Nationalism

These movements emphasized shared language, culture, and historical identity as the basis for nationhood. They often emerged in reaction to multinational empires (Ottoman, Austrian, Russian) that ruled over distinct ethnic groups.

Greek War of Independence (1821–1832)

• Philhellenism attracted European romantics and volunteers who saw Greece as the cradle of Western civilization worth saving
• Great Power intervention (Britain, France, Russia) proved decisive—nationalism succeeded when it aligned with major powers' interests
• Orthodox Christian identity united Greeks against Ottoman Muslim rule, blending religious and ethnic nationalism

Hungarian Revolution of 1848

• Lajos Kossuth demanded Hungarian autonomy within the Habsburg Empire, emphasizing Magyar language and culture
• Crushed by Austrian and Russian forces—demonstrating that nationalist movements could fail when facing united conservative opposition
• "Springtime of Peoples" saw simultaneous revolutions across Europe in 1848, most of which failed but planted seeds for later success

Belgian Revolution (1830–1831)

• Catholic, French-speaking southerners rejected rule by Protestant, Dutch-speaking Netherlands after the 1815 Congress of Vienna merger
• Rapid success came partly because major powers preferred a neutral buffer state between France and the German states
• Constitutional monarchy established—showing nationalism could achieve liberal goals without republican revolution

---

Unification Nationalism

Unlike separatist movements seeking independence from empires, these revolutions aimed to consolidate fragmented territories into unified nation-states. They required overcoming regional identities and often relied on warfare and diplomacy rather than popular uprising.

Italian Unification (Risorgimento) (1815–1871)

• Three approaches competed: Mazzini's republican revolution, Cavour's Piedmont-led diplomacy, and Garibaldi's military campaigns
• Cavour's realpolitik proved decisive—he allied with France against Austria and manipulated circumstances to absorb other Italian states
• "We have made Italy; now we must make Italians"—regional identities remained strong, showing that political unification precedes cultural unity

German Unification (1866–1871)

• Bismarck's "blood and iron" strategy used three wars (Danish, Austro-Prussian, Franco-Prussian) to forge unity through shared military victory
• Kleindeutschland solution excluded Austria, creating a Prussian-dominated Protestant Germany rather than a larger Catholic-inclusive state
• Proclamation at Versailles (1871) deliberately humiliated France—sowing seeds for future conflict and demonstrating nationalism's aggressive potential

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two revolutions best illustrate how Great Power intervention could determine nationalist success or failure? What made the difference in each case?

2. Compare the social composition of revolutionary leadership in the Haitian Revolution versus the Latin American Wars of Independence. How did this affect post-independence societies?

3. Both Italian and German unification created new nation-states from fragmented territories. What were the key differences in how each unification was achieved, and what role did warfare play?

4. If an FRQ asked you to explain why the revolutions of 1848 mostly failed while earlier revolutions (American, French, Latin American) succeeded, which factors would you emphasize?

5. How do the American and French Revolutions illustrate different types of nationalism—civic (based on shared political values) versus ethnic (based on shared culture)? Which elements of each appear in later nationalist movements?