Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
When you're studying feminist philosophy, you're not just memorizing a list of "isms"—you're learning to identify different diagnoses of the same problem: why does gender-based oppression exist, and what would it take to end it? Each theory you'll encounter offers a distinct answer to these questions, locating the root cause of oppression in different places: law, economics, psychology, culture, or the very categories we use to think about gender. Your exam will test whether you can distinguish these theoretical frameworks and apply them to real-world scenarios.
The key to mastering this material is understanding that feminist theories aren't just abstract positions—they lead to different strategies for change. A liberal feminist and a radical feminist might both oppose workplace discrimination, but they'd disagree fundamentally about why it exists and what to do about it. Don't just memorize definitions; know what each theory identifies as the source of oppression, what kind of change it demands, and how it relates to (or critiques) other approaches.
These theories work within existing social, legal, and political structures, arguing that the system itself isn't the problem—unequal access to the system is. They emphasize rights, representation, and incremental change.
Compare: Liberal Feminism vs. Existentialist Feminism—both emphasize individual agency and freedom, but liberal feminism focuses on external barriers (laws, policies) while existentialist feminism targets internalized constraints (bad faith, self-deception). If asked to explain how oppression operates at the individual level, existentialism is your stronger example.
These theories argue that oppression is built into the foundation of social systems—whether that's patriarchy, capitalism, or both. Reform isn't enough; the structures themselves must be dismantled or fundamentally transformed.
Compare: Radical Feminism vs. Marxist/Socialist Feminism—both demand systemic transformation, but they disagree on what system is primary. Radical feminists see patriarchy as foundational (capitalism is one of its expressions); Marxist feminists see capitalism as foundational (patriarchy serves economic interests). This is a classic exam distinction.
These theories challenge the assumption that "woman" is a unified category with shared experiences. They emphasize how gender intersects with race, class, sexuality, and culture to produce different forms of oppression.
Compare: Intersectional Feminism vs. Postcolonial Feminism—both critique mainstream feminism for ignoring difference, but intersectionality focuses on domestic structures of race, class, and gender, while postcolonial feminism emphasizes global power relations and colonial history. Use intersectionality for U.S.-focused questions; postcolonial feminism for questions about globalization or non-Western contexts.
These theories focus on epistemology—how we know what we know about gender—and argue that language, culture, and unconscious processes construct our understanding of "woman" and "man."
Compare: Postmodern Feminism vs. Psychoanalytic Feminism—both analyze how gender is constructed rather than natural, but postmodernism emphasizes discourse and cultural performance, while psychoanalytic feminism emphasizes unconscious processes and early development. Postmodernism tends toward political skepticism; psychoanalytic feminism retains a depth model of the self.
These theories expand feminism's scope beyond human social relations, connecting gender oppression to broader patterns of domination—including the exploitation of nature and non-human life.
Compare: Ecofeminism vs. Radical Feminism—both identify patriarchy as a system of domination, but ecofeminism extends the analysis to include nature as a co-victim. If an exam question asks about feminism and environmental ethics, ecofeminism is your go-to theory.
| Core Question | Best Theories |
|---|---|
| What is the root cause of oppression? | Radical (patriarchy), Marxist/Socialist (capitalism), Postcolonial (colonialism) |
| Can we reform existing systems? | Liberal (yes), Radical/Marxist (no—revolutionary change needed) |
| Is "woman" a unified category? | Intersectional, Black, Postcolonial, Postmodern (no—difference matters) |
| How is gender constructed? | Postmodern (discourse/performance), Psychoanalytic (unconscious), Existentialist (situation/choice) |
| What is the relationship between gender and nature? | Ecofeminism (linked domination) |
| Whose experiences should center feminist analysis? | Black Feminism (Black women), Postcolonial (non-Western women), Intersectional (most marginalized) |
| What counts as feminist strategy? | Liberal (legislation), Radical (consciousness-raising), Marxist (collective action) |
Both radical feminism and Marxist/socialist feminism call for systemic transformation. What is the key disagreement between them about the source of women's oppression?
How would an intersectional feminist critique a liberal feminist campaign focused solely on the gender wage gap? What might be missing from that analysis?
Postmodern feminism and existentialist feminism both reject the idea that gender is a fixed, natural essence. How do their explanations of gender construction differ?
Compare Black feminism and postcolonial feminism: what do they share in their critique of mainstream feminism, and what distinguishes their primary focus?
An FRQ asks you to evaluate the claim that "feminism should focus on changing laws and policies." Which two theories would you use to present opposing perspectives, and what would each argue?