Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Educational theories aren't just abstract ideas you'll encounter on an exam—they're the foundational frameworks that explain why teachers teach the way they do and how students actually learn. You're being tested on your ability to recognize these theories in action, identify their key mechanisms, and understand when each approach is most effective. The concepts here—behaviorist conditioning, cognitive processing, social construction of knowledge, and critical consciousness—show up repeatedly in discussions of curriculum design, classroom management, assessment strategies, and educational reform.
Don't just memorize names and definitions. For each theory, know what it assumes about learners, what role the teacher plays, and how learning is measured or demonstrated. When you can compare theories and explain why a teacher might choose one approach over another, you're thinking like an educator—and that's exactly what exam questions will ask you to do.
These theories emphasize observable actions and how external factors shape what students do. The core assumption is that learning can be measured through behavioral change, and the environment is the primary driver of that change.
Compare: Behaviorism vs. Social Cognitive Theory—both focus on observable behavior, but behaviorism ignores internal processes while social cognitive theory emphasizes mental factors like self-efficacy and attention. If an FRQ asks about motivation, social cognitive theory gives you more to work with.
These theories shift attention to what happens inside the learner's head. Learning is understood as information processing, mental organization, and the active construction of meaning.
Compare: Cognitivism vs. Constructivism—both focus on mental activity, but cognitivism emphasizes how information is processed universally, while constructivism stresses that each learner constructs unique meaning. Cognitivism leads to structured lessons; constructivism leads to open-ended exploration.
These theories argue that learning is fundamentally social. Knowledge isn't just transmitted or individually constructed—it emerges through interaction, dialogue, and cultural participation.
Compare: Social Constructivism vs. Experiential Learning—both value active engagement over passive reception, but social constructivism emphasizes collaboration and dialogue while experiential learning can be individual. Both reject the idea that students learn best by listening to lectures.
These theories place the individual student's needs, potential, and identity at the center of education. The goal is personal growth and development of the whole person, not just academic achievement.
Compare: Humanism vs. Multiple Intelligences—both advocate for recognizing individual differences and moving beyond one-size-fits-all education. Humanism focuses on emotional and personal development; Multiple Intelligences focuses on cognitive diversity. Both challenge standardized approaches to assessment.
These theories argue that education should change learners and society. Learning isn't neutral—it either reinforces existing power structures or challenges them.
Compare: Transformative Learning vs. Critical Pedagogy—both seek fundamental change through critical reflection, but transformative learning focuses on individual perspective shifts while critical pedagogy explicitly targets social justice and collective action. Critical pedagogy is more overtly political.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| External factors drive learning | Behaviorism, Social Cognitive Theory |
| Mental processes and information | Cognitivism, Constructivism |
| Social interaction builds knowledge | Social Constructivism, Experiential Learning |
| Whole-person development | Humanism, Multiple Intelligences |
| Learning as social change | Transformative Learning, Critical Pedagogy |
| Teacher as facilitator | Humanism, Constructivism, Social Constructivism |
| Observable outcomes emphasized | Behaviorism, Social Cognitive Theory |
| Prior knowledge essential | Cognitivism, Constructivism |
Which two theories both emphasize observable behavior but differ in their treatment of internal mental processes? What specific concept distinguishes them?
A teacher designs a lesson where students work in groups to solve a community problem, with the teacher providing guidance only when students get stuck. Which two theories best support this approach, and why?
Compare and contrast cognitivism and constructivism: How does each theory view the role of the learner, and what type of instruction does each suggest?
If an FRQ asks you to explain how education can promote social justice, which theories would you draw on? Identify at least two and explain their key mechanisms.
A student struggles with traditional tests but excels when creating visual presentations. Which theory explains why this student's abilities might be undervalued in conventional schooling, and what does this theory recommend?