upgrade
upgrade

🔬Condensed Matter Physics

Magnetism Types

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Understanding magnetism types is fundamental to condensed matter physics because it reveals how quantum mechanical behavior at the atomic level produces macroscopic material properties. You're being tested on your ability to connect electron configurations, exchange interactions, and thermal effects to observable magnetic phenomena. These concepts appear throughout the AP curriculum—from explaining why some materials make permanent magnets to understanding the physics behind MRI machines and computer hard drives.

Don't just memorize which materials are ferromagnetic or paramagnetic—know why they behave differently. The key distinctions come down to three factors: whether electrons are paired or unpaired, how neighboring magnetic moments interact (parallel, antiparallel, or disordered), and how temperature competes with magnetic ordering. Master these principles, and you can reason through any magnetism question the exam throws at you.


Induced Response: No Permanent Moments

These materials lack intrinsic magnetic moments but still respond to applied fields. The response arises from how electron orbitals or unpaired spins react to external perturbation rather than from pre-existing magnetic order.

Diamagnetism

  • Universal but weak—present in all materials, but typically masked by stronger magnetic effects when unpaired electrons exist
  • Negative susceptibility creates a repulsive response; induced moments oppose the applied field due to Lenz's law applied to electron orbital motion
  • No unpaired electrons required—arises purely from orbital currents, making bismuth and copper classic examples

Paramagnetism

  • Unpaired electrons create permanent atomic moments that align with an applied field, producing positive susceptibility
  • No retained magnetization—thermal fluctuations randomize moment orientations once the external field is removed
  • Curie law behavior means susceptibility varies as χ1/T\chi \propto 1/T, with aluminum and transition metal ions as common examples

Compare: Diamagnetism vs. Paramagnetism—both lack spontaneous magnetization, but diamagnets repel fields (negative χ\chi) while paramagnets attract them (positive χ\chi). If an FRQ asks about material response to weak fields, identify whether unpaired electrons are present.


Cooperative Ordering: Parallel Alignment

In these materials, exchange interactions between neighboring atoms favor parallel spin alignment, creating strong, often permanent magnetization. Temperature plays a critical role in maintaining or destroying this order.

Ferromagnetism

  • Domain structure allows parallel spin alignment within regions, producing strong permanent magnets even without an applied field
  • Curie temperature (TCT_C) marks the thermal threshold above which ferromagnetic order breaks down and the material becomes paramagnetic
  • Hysteresis and remanence—iron, cobalt, and nickel retain magnetization after field removal, enabling permanent magnet applications

Itinerant Magnetism

  • Delocalized conduction electrons collectively produce magnetic order, rather than localized atomic moments
  • Band structure dependent—the Stoner criterion determines whether exchange splitting of electron bands favors ferromagnetic ordering
  • Sensitive to external conditions—temperature, pressure, and composition dramatically affect magnetic phases in metals and heavy fermion systems

Compare: Ferromagnetism vs. Itinerant Magnetism—both produce net magnetization, but ferromagnetism typically involves localized moments while itinerant magnetism arises from collective electron behavior. Know this distinction for questions about metallic magnets.


Cooperative Ordering: Antiparallel Alignment

Here, exchange interactions favor antiparallel spin arrangements between neighbors. The net magnetization depends on whether the opposing moments perfectly cancel or leave a residual.

Antiferromagnetism

  • Adjacent moments align antiparallel, resulting in zero net magnetization despite strong local ordering
  • Néel temperature (TNT_N) defines the transition point below which antiferromagnetic order emerges
  • Susceptibility peaks at TNT_N—manganese oxide (MnO) and iron oxide (FeO) demonstrate this characteristic behavior

Ferrimagnetism

  • Unequal antiparallel moments produce net magnetization, combining features of ferro- and antiferromagnetism
  • Two magnetic sublattices with different magnitudes create the imbalance; mixed-valence ions are key
  • Magnetite (Fe3O4\text{Fe}_3\text{O}_4) is the classic example, historically important as the first known magnetic material

Compare: Antiferromagnetism vs. Ferrimagnetism—both feature antiparallel alignment, but ferrimagnets have unequal sublattice moments yielding net magnetization. This distinction frequently appears in questions about magnetic oxides.


Size and Disorder Effects

When materials are nanostructured or contain competing interactions, conventional magnetic order breaks down and exotic behaviors emerge.

Superparamagnetism

  • Nanoparticle size threshold—below ~10-20 nm, thermal energy can flip the entire particle's magnetization direction
  • No hysteresis at room temperature despite ferromagnetic composition; behaves like a "super" paramagnet with giant moment
  • Critical for technology—MRI contrast agents and high-density magnetic storage exploit this size-dependent behavior

Spin Glass

  • Frozen disorder—magnetic moments lock into random orientations below the glass transition temperature (TgT_g)
  • Competing interactions between spins prevent long-range order; frustration is the key concept
  • Memory effects and slow dynamics—CuMn alloys show aging behavior where magnetic response depends on thermal history

Compare: Superparamagnetism vs. Spin Glass—both lack conventional long-range order, but superparamagnets have coherent particle moments that fluctuate thermally, while spin glasses have frozen random configurations. Size versus disorder is the key distinction.


Field-Induced and Complex Ordering

These materials exhibit magnetic structures that depend sensitively on applied fields or have non-collinear spin arrangements. The interplay between competing interactions produces rich phase diagrams.

Metamagnetism

  • Field-induced transition from antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic alignment at a critical field strength
  • Sudden magnetization jump occurs at the transition, distinguishing it from gradual paramagnetic response
  • Common in layered systems—certain Fe-Ni alloys and antiferromagnets with weak interlayer coupling exhibit this behavior

Helimagnetism

  • Spiral spin structure where moments rotate progressively along a crystallographic direction
  • Pitch varies with conditions—temperature and applied fields can compress or extend the helical wavelength
  • Supports magnetic skyrmions—topologically protected spin textures in materials like MnSi enable potential spintronic applications

Compare: Metamagnetism vs. Helimagnetism—both show field-dependent behavior, but metamagnets undergo discrete phase transitions while helimagnets continuously modify their spiral structure. FRQs may ask about field-dependent magnetic phases.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
No intrinsic moment (induced response)Diamagnetism, Paramagnetism
Parallel alignment (net magnetization)Ferromagnetism, Itinerant Magnetism
Antiparallel alignment (cancellation)Antiferromagnetism
Antiparallel alignment (partial cancellation)Ferrimagnetism
Thermal/size effects on orderingSuperparamagnetism
Disorder and frustrationSpin Glass
Field-induced transitionsMetamagnetism
Non-collinear spin structuresHelimagnetism

Self-Check Questions

  1. Which two magnetism types both feature antiparallel spin alignment, and what determines whether net magnetization exists?

  2. A material shows strong magnetization at room temperature but becomes paramagnetic when heated above 770°C. What type of magnetism is this, and what is the significance of that temperature?

  3. Compare superparamagnetism and paramagnetism: what do they share, and why does particle size matter for one but not the other?

  4. If an FRQ describes a material with "frozen random spin orientations" and "memory effects," which magnetism type should you identify, and what causes this behavior?

  5. Explain why ferrimagnets like magnetite show net magnetization while antiferromagnets like MnO do not, despite both having antiparallel spin arrangements.