Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Magnetic field formulas are the backbone of electromagnetism—one of the most heavily tested topics in Physics II. You're being tested on your ability to connect current flow to field generation, field geometry to symmetry, and changing flux to induced voltage. These aren't isolated equations; they form a coherent story about how moving charges create fields, how those fields exert forces, and how changing fields generate new currents. Understanding this chain of cause and effect is what separates students who ace FRQs from those who struggle to apply formulas.
The key principles you'll need to master include field generation (how currents produce magnetic fields), force interactions (how fields act on charges and wires), and electromagnetic induction (how changing fields create voltage). Don't just memorize formulas—know what physical situation each formula describes and when to apply it. If you can identify the symmetry of a problem and connect it to the right law, you'll navigate even the trickiest exam questions with confidence.
Moving charges produce magnetic fields, and the geometry of the current flow determines the field's shape and strength. These formulas let you calculate the magnetic field produced by different current configurations.
Compare: Long straight wire vs. solenoid—both use current to generate fields, but the wire produces a field that decreases with distance while the solenoid produces a uniform field inside. If an FRQ asks about creating a constant magnetic field region, the solenoid is your answer.
When current distributions have high symmetry, Ampère's Law provides an elegant path to calculating the magnetic field without integration.
Compare: Biot-Savart Law vs. Ampère's Law—Biot-Savart works for any current configuration but requires integration; Ampère's Law is faster but only applies to symmetric situations. Know which tool fits the problem's geometry.
Magnetic fields don't just exist—they exert forces on moving charges and current-carrying conductors. These formulas describe how fields and charges interact.
Compare: Force on a charge vs. force on a wire—both use cross products with , but the charge formula uses while the wire formula uses . Recognize that represents many charges moving together—same physics, different scale.
A changing magnetic environment induces electric effects—this is the principle behind generators, transformers, and wireless charging.
Compare: Faraday's Law vs. Lenz's Law—Faraday tells you the magnitude of induced emf; Lenz tells you the direction. On FRQs, you'll often need both: calculate the emf with Faraday, then use Lenz to explain which way current flows.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Field from steady current | Long straight wire, circular loop, solenoid |
| Symmetry-based calculation | Ampère's Law (solenoids, toroids, infinite wires) |
| General field calculation | Biot-Savart Law (any current geometry) |
| Force on moving charges | Lorentz Force (circular motion, mass spectrometers) |
| Force on conductors | Current-carrying wire in field (motors) |
| Quantifying field through surface | Magnetic flux |
| Induced voltage | Faraday's Law (generators, transformers) |
| Direction of induced effects | Lenz's Law (opposes change) |
A long straight wire and a solenoid both carry the same current. How does the magnetic field's spatial dependence differ between them, and why does this difference arise from their geometries?
You need to calculate the magnetic field around a current-carrying wire. Under what conditions would you choose Ampère's Law over the Biot-Savart Law, and what must be true about the field for Ampère's Law to be useful?
Compare the Lorentz force on a single moving charge to the force on a current-carrying wire. How are the formulas related, and why does a magnetic force do no work on a free charge but can do work on a wire?
A bar magnet approaches a conducting loop. Using both Faraday's Law and Lenz's Law, explain how to determine (a) whether an emf is induced, (b) its magnitude, and (c) the direction of the induced current.
If you wanted to maximize the induced emf in a generator, which variables in Faraday's Law would you optimize, and what practical trade-offs might limit each approach?