Levels of Linguistic Analysis

Why This Matters

When you study linguistics, you're essentially learning to take language apart like a mechanic examining an engine—each level of analysis reveals a different component of how human communication actually works. These seven levels aren't arbitrary divisions; they represent a hierarchy from the most concrete, physical aspects of language (the sounds coming out of your mouth) to the most abstract, context-dependent aspects (how entire conversations create meaning). You're being tested on your ability to identify which level of analysis applies to a given linguistic phenomenon and to explain how these levels interact and build upon each other.

The key insight here is that language operates simultaneously on all these levels at once. When you speak a single sentence, you're producing sounds (phonetics), following sound patterns (phonology), combining meaningful units (morphology), arranging words grammatically (syntax), conveying meaning (semantics), implying things beyond your literal words (pragmatics), and contributing to a larger conversation (discourse). Don't just memorize definitions—know what questions each level answers and where the boundaries between levels get fuzzy.

---

Sound-Level Analysis: The Physical and Cognitive Foundations

These two levels deal with the sounds of language, but from fundamentally different perspectives. Phonetics asks "what sounds exist and how are they made?" while phonology asks "how do sounds function in a particular language system?"

Phonetics

• Studies the physical properties of speech sounds—production, transmission, and perception as measurable, concrete phenomena
• Three branches divide the field: articulatory (how your mouth/throat produce sounds), acoustic (the sound waves themselves), and auditory (how ears and brains perceive sounds)
• Language-universal focus means phonetics describes all possible human speech sounds, not just those in one language—essential for understanding accents and pronunciation differences

Phonology

• Examines how sounds function within a specific language's system—the abstract, cognitive patterns rather than physical reality
• Phonemes vs. allophones is the central distinction: phonemes are contrastive (changing them changes meaning), while allophones are predictable variations of the same phoneme
• Explains phonotactic constraints—why English allows "str-" clusters but not "tsr-," governing what sounds can combine in a given language

---

Word-Level Analysis: Building Blocks of Meaning

Morphology sits at the crucial junction between sound and meaning, examining how languages package meaningful units into words.

Morphology

• Studies morphemes, the smallest meaningful units—"unhappiness" contains three: un- (negation), happy (core meaning), -ness (makes it a noun)
• Free vs. bound morphemes distinguishes words that stand alone (happy) from those that must attach to others (un-, -ness)
• Inflection vs. derivation captures two word-formation processes: inflection changes grammatical form (walk → walked) while derivation creates new words (walk → walker)

---

Sentence-Level Analysis: Structure and Meaning

These two levels both operate at the sentence level but ask different questions. Syntax asks "how are words arranged?" while semantics asks "what does it mean?"

Syntax

• Governs sentence structure and word arrangement—the rules determining grammaticality, not just meaning
• Word order typology varies across languages: English uses SVO (subject-verb-object), Japanese uses SOV, and some languages allow relatively free order
• Hierarchical structure matters more than linear order—syntax reveals that "the student from Paris" groups differently than word-by-word reading suggests

Semantics

• Investigates meaning at word and sentence levels—what expressions literally denote, independent of context
• Lexical vs. compositional semantics divides the field: lexical examines individual word meanings, while compositional explains how meanings combine (the meaning of "big red ball" derives from its parts plus combination rules)
• Handles ambiguity systematically—"I saw the man with the telescope" has two semantic readings based on different structural interpretations

---

Context-Level Analysis: Beyond Literal Meaning

These levels move beyond the sentence itself to examine how context, speaker intention, and social dynamics shape communication. The key shift is from what language means in isolation to what speakers mean when they use it.

Pragmatics

• Studies how context shapes meaning interpretation—what speakers intend versus what words literally say
• Implicature captures implied meaning: saying "It's cold in here" might implicate "Please close the window" without stating it
• Speech acts recognize that utterances do things: "I promise to help" doesn't just describe—it performs the act of promising

Discourse Analysis

• Analyzes language beyond single sentences—conversations, narratives, essays, and other extended texts
• Coherence and cohesion are central concepts: coherence is logical connection of ideas, while cohesion is linguistic devices (pronouns, conjunctions) that link sentences
• Social and cultural dimensions emerge at this level—how power, identity, and ideology operate through language patterns

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. A linguist notices that Korean speakers pronounce [r] and [l] as variants of the same sound, while English speakers treat them as distinct. Which level of analysis explains this difference, and what key terms would you use?

2. Compare and contrast morphology and syntax: both deal with combining units, so what distinguishes them? Give an example phenomenon that belongs to each.

3. If someone says "Nice weather we're having" during a thunderstorm, which level of analysis handles the intended sarcastic meaning—semantics or pragmatics? Explain why.

4. The sentence "The chicken is ready to eat" is ambiguous. Is this a semantic or syntactic ambiguity? What about "I saw her duck"?

5. A student claims that phonetics and phonology are "basically the same thing." Write a 2-3 sentence response explaining the key distinction, using the terms language-universal and language-specific.