Lattice Parameters

Why This Matters

Lattice parameters are the mathematical DNA of crystals—they encode everything about how atoms arrange themselves in three-dimensional space. When you're working through crystallography problems, you're being tested on your ability to connect geometric constraints to physical properties: how unit cell dimensions determine density, how interaxial angles dictate symmetry, and how these parameters ultimately predict diffraction patterns and material behavior. Mastering lattice parameters means understanding periodicity, symmetry operations, and the relationship between real and reciprocal space.

Don't just memorize that there are seven crystal systems or 14 Bravais lattices—know why certain parameter combinations produce specific symmetries, and how Miller indices translate geometric relationships into predictive tools. The concepts here form the foundation for everything from X-ray crystallography analysis to predicting electronic band structures. Focus on the underlying mathematics: if you understand how parameters constrain one another, you can derive relationships rather than recall them.

---

Defining the Unit Cell: Dimensions and Angles

The unit cell is your fundamental building block—the smallest repeating unit that, when translated through space, generates the entire crystal lattice. Two sets of parameters fully define any unit cell: edge lengths and interaxial angles.

Unit Cell Dimensions (a, b, c)

• Three edge lengths $a$, $b$, and $c$ define the unit cell's size along each crystallographic axis—these directly determine lattice spacing and crystal density
• Parameter relationships reveal symmetry: cubic systems require $a = b = c$, while triclinic systems have no constraints on relative lengths
• Experimental determination comes from diffraction data, where peak positions encode these dimensional parameters through Bragg's law

Interaxial Angles (α, β, γ)

• Three angles define unit cell geometry: $\alpha$ (between $b$ and $c$), $\beta$ (between $a$ and $c$), and $\gamma$ (between $a$ and $b$)
• Angular constraints distinguish crystal systems—cubic requires all angles equal $90°$, while triclinic permits $\alpha \neq \beta \neq \gamma \neq 90°$
• Combined with dimensions, these six parameters ($a, b, c, \alpha, \beta, \gamma$) provide a complete mathematical description of unit cell shape and orientation

---

Classification Systems: From Parameters to Categories

Crystal classification isn't arbitrary—it emerges directly from the mathematical constraints that lattice parameters impose on symmetry. Fewer constraints mean lower symmetry; more constraints mean higher symmetry.

Crystal Systems

• Seven crystal systems organize all possible unit cell geometries based on parameter constraints: cubic, tetragonal, orthorhombic, hexagonal, rhombohedral, monoclinic, and triclinic
• Symmetry hierarchy runs from triclinic (no constraints, lowest symmetry) to cubic ($a = b = c$, $\alpha = \beta = \gamma = 90°$, highest symmetry)
• Parameter conditions are testable: know that tetragonal requires $a = b \neq c$ with all right angles, while hexagonal requires $a = b \neq c$ with $\gamma = 120°$

Bravais Lattices

• 14 distinct lattices represent every possible three-dimensional periodic arrangement—derived by combining crystal systems with centering types
• Centering types include primitive (P), body-centered (I), face-centered (F), and base-centered (A, B, or C)—each adds lattice points to the unit cell
• Not all combinations exist: only mathematically distinct arrangements count, which is why there are 14 rather than 42 (7 systems × 6 possible centerings)

Primitive and Non-Primitive Unit Cells

• Primitive cells contain exactly one lattice point (corners contribute $\frac{1}{8}$ each, totaling 1)—they're the smallest possible repeating unit
• Non-primitive cells contain multiple lattice points (body-centered has 2, face-centered has 4) but often reveal symmetry more clearly
• Choice matters for calculations: non-primitive cells simplify symmetry analysis but require careful accounting when computing properties like density

---

Symmetry: The Mathematical Heart of Crystallography

Symmetry operations aren't just descriptive—they're predictive. The symmetry of a crystal constrains its physical properties, from optical behavior to mechanical response.

Symmetry Operations

• Four fundamental operations generate all crystal symmetry: translations, rotations ($n$-fold axes), reflections (mirror planes), and inversions (center of symmetry)
• Combination rules determine which operations are compatible—not every combination produces a valid crystal symmetry
• Property predictions follow from symmetry: crystals with inversion centers cannot exhibit piezoelectricity, while certain rotation axes enable optical activity

Space Groups

• 230 unique space groups enumerate every possible three-dimensional crystal symmetry by combining point group operations with lattice translations
• Notation encodes information: the space group symbol tells you the crystal system, centering type, and key symmetry elements (e.g., $Fm\bar{3}m$ indicates face-centered cubic with specific mirror and rotation symmetries)
• Structure determination relies on space group assignment—diffraction patterns contain systematic absences that identify the space group

---

Describing Orientations: Planes and Directions

Miller indices provide a universal language for specifying crystallographic directions and planes. This notation system converts geometric relationships into integer labels that simplify calculations and communication.

Miller Indices

• Integer notation $(hkl)$ describes plane orientation by taking reciprocals of axis intercepts and clearing fractions—a plane intercepting at $\frac{1}{2}a$, $\frac{1}{3}b$, $\frac{1}{4}c$ becomes $(2\,3\,4)$
• Negative indices use bar notation ($\bar{h}$) to indicate intercepts on negative axis directions—essential for describing all equivalent planes
• Family notation $\{hkl\}$ groups symmetrically equivalent planes, while $\langle hkl \rangle$ groups equivalent directions—crucial for understanding why certain planes dominate crystal faces

Lattice Planes and d-Spacing

• d-spacing $d_{hkl}$ measures perpendicular distance between adjacent $(hkl)$ planes—this is what diffraction experiments actually measure
• Bragg's law $n\lambda = 2d_{hkl}\sin\theta$ connects d-spacing to diffraction angles, making Miller indices experimentally accessible
• Calculation formulas depend on crystal system: for cubic, $d_{hkl} = \frac{a}{\sqrt{h^2 + k^2 + l^2}}$; other systems require more complex expressions involving all six lattice parameters

---

Reciprocal Space: The Diffraction Perspective

The reciprocal lattice transforms real-space periodicity into a framework for understanding wave interactions with crystals. Every diffraction spot corresponds to a reciprocal lattice point.

Reciprocal Lattice

• Mathematical dual of the real lattice where reciprocal vectors $\mathbf{a}^*$, $\mathbf{b}^*$, $\mathbf{c}^*$ are defined by $\mathbf{a}^* = \frac{\mathbf{b} \times \mathbf{c}}{V}$ (and cyclic permutations)
• Diffraction interpretation: each reciprocal lattice point $(hkl)$ represents a set of real-space planes, and diffraction occurs when the scattering vector equals a reciprocal lattice vector
• Inverse relationships mean large real-space dimensions produce small reciprocal-space dimensions—this is why fine structural details require wide-angle diffraction data

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two lattice parameters would you need to distinguish a tetragonal crystal from a cubic crystal, and what specific relationship differs between them?

2. Compare primitive and face-centered unit cells: if both describe the same material, how would calculated density differ if you mistakenly used the wrong lattice point count?

3. A diffraction experiment reveals systematic absences consistent with body-centering. What does this tell you about the Bravais lattice, and which crystal systems could still be possible?

4. Given Miller indices $(2\,1\,0)$ for a cubic crystal with $a = 4$ Å, calculate the d-spacing and explain why $(4\,2\,0)$ planes would have a different d-spacing value.

5. Compare and contrast real-space lattice parameters with reciprocal lattice vectors: how does doubling the real-space parameter $a$ affect the corresponding reciprocal parameter $a^*$, and why does this matter for diffraction experiments?