Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Language acquisition is one of the most remarkable feats of human cognition—children master complex grammatical systems without explicit instruction, following a predictable developmental trajectory across cultures. This topic sits at the intersection of several core cognitive science themes you'll be tested on: nativist vs. empiricist debates, critical periods, statistical learning, and the relationship between thought and language. Understanding these stages helps you grasp how the mind bootstraps itself into linguistic competence and why language serves as a window into cognitive architecture.
Don't just memorize the age ranges for each stage—know what cognitive capacities each stage reveals and what theoretical debates the evidence supports. When you see an exam question about language development, you're really being asked about underlying mechanisms: Is the child demonstrating innate grammatical knowledge? Statistical pattern recognition? Social learning? Each stage provides evidence for different theoretical positions, and that's where the points are.
Before producing recognizable words, infants are already building the cognitive and perceptual infrastructure for language. These stages demonstrate that language acquisition begins with pattern recognition and social engagement, not speech production.
Compare: Prelinguistic vs. Babbling—both precede meaningful speech, but prelinguistic focuses on receptive skills and social foundations while babbling develops productive vocal control. If asked about evidence for innate language capacity, babbling's universality is your go-to example.
The transition to meaningful speech reveals how children map sounds to concepts and begin using language symbolically. These stages highlight the tension between limited production capacity and sophisticated underlying comprehension.
Compare: Holophrastic vs. Telegraphic speech—both show comprehension exceeding production, but telegraphic speech reveals combinatorial ability and basic syntax. This transition is key evidence in debates about whether grammar emerges from general learning or innate principles.
As vocabulary grows, children begin acquiring the morphological and syntactic rules that give language its generative power. These stages provide critical evidence for rule-learning versus item-based learning debates.
Compare: Early vs. Later multiword stages—both involve grammatical development, but early multiword shows rule extraction (evidenced by errors) while later multiword shows rule refinement and pragmatic sophistication. Overregularization errors are prime exam material for arguing against pure imitation theories.
The final stage represents the achievement of adult-like linguistic ability, though language learning continues throughout life. This stage raises questions about what changes after the critical period closes.
Compare: Later multiword vs. Adult-like stage—both feature complex grammar, but the adult-like stage adds metalinguistic awareness and marks the transition from implicit to explicit language knowledge. This distinction matters for understanding why adult L2 learners struggle with aspects children acquire effortlessly.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Perceptual/Statistical Learning | Prelinguistic (phoneme discrimination), Babbling (phonetic drift) |
| Evidence for Innate Capacity | Babbling (universal, deaf signers), Two-word (consistent word order) |
| Comprehension Exceeds Production | Holophrastic, Telegraphic speech |
| Rule Extraction | Early multiword (overregularization errors) |
| Morpheme Acquisition Order | Later multiword stage |
| Critical Period Evidence | Adult-like stage (L1 vs. L2 differences) |
| Social/Pragmatic Development | Prelinguistic (joint attention), Later multiword (audience design) |
Which two stages provide the strongest evidence that children extract grammatical rules rather than simply memorizing adult utterances? What specific phenomena support this?
Compare the prelinguistic and babbling stages: both precede meaningful speech, but what different aspects of language readiness does each demonstrate?
A child says "my feets are cold." What stage does this represent, and why is this error actually evidence of sophisticated cognitive processing?
How does the transition from holophrastic to telegraphic speech inform the debate between nativist and empiricist theories of language acquisition?
If an FRQ asks you to evaluate the critical period hypothesis, which stages and what types of evidence would you draw on to construct your argument?