Why This Matters
The 1920s represent cinema's adolescence—a decade when filmmakers discovered what the medium could actually do. You're being tested not just on which films came out when, but on the formal innovations and stylistic movements that emerged during this period. Understanding how German Expressionism, Soviet montage theory, documentary ethics, and the transition to sound developed will help you trace the DNA of every film genre that followed.
Don't just memorize titles and directors. Know what visual technique or narrative breakthrough each film represents. When an exam question asks about the origins of horror cinematography or the ethics of documentary staging, you need to connect specific films to broader movements. These fifteen films aren't just historically important—they're the vocabulary you'll use to discuss everything from film noir to modern blockbusters.
Visual Style as Meaning: German Expressionism and Its Legacy
German Expressionism rejected realistic representation in favor of distorted sets, exaggerated shadows, and stylized performances that externalized psychological states. These films emerged from post-WWI trauma and anxiety, using visual design to convey inner turmoil.
The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920)
- Pioneering German Expressionist film—its painted sets with impossible angles and jagged shadows became the template for visualizing madness and unreliable narration
- Frame narrative structure reveals the storyteller may be insane, making it one of cinema's first twist endings and a study in subjective point of view
- Influenced horror and film noir through its demonstration that mise-en-scène itself could carry psychological meaning
Nosferatu (1922)
- First feature-length vampire film—established genre conventions including the vampire's vulnerability to sunlight and plague-like spread of evil
- Shadow and negative space create dread without expensive effects; Count Orlok's shadow climbing the stairs remains iconic visual shorthand for approaching menace
- Unauthorized Dracula adaptation that nearly got destroyed in a copyright lawsuit, surviving only through pirated prints
Metropolis (1927)
- Monumental science fiction with elaborate miniatures, the Schüfftan process, and a cast of thousands creating a dystopian cityscape
- Class struggle allegory—the film's division between underground workers and above-ground elites reflects Weimar-era anxieties about industrialization
- Visual influence extends everywhere from Blade Runner to music videos; the robot Maria design became the archetype for humanoid machines
Compare: Caligari vs. Metropolis—both use Expressionist distortion, but Caligari's painted flats create psychological unreality while Metropolis's massive sets create social unreality. If asked about Expressionism's range, these two show its intimate and epic possibilities.
Editing as Language: Soviet Montage Theory
Soviet filmmakers theorized that meaning emerges from the collision of shots rather than from individual images. Montage wasn't just cutting—it was intellectual argumentation through juxtaposition.
Battleship Potemkin (1925)
- Eisenstein's montage theory in action—the Odessa Steps sequence uses rhythmic editing, graphic matches, and temporal expansion to create emotional impact impossible in real time
- Propaganda with formal innovation—the film depicts the 1905 mutiny as revolutionary awakening, but its techniques transcended ideology to influence all narrative editing
- The Odessa Steps massacre (largely invented for the film) has been quoted, parodied, and studied more than almost any sequence in cinema history
Man with a Movie Camera (1929)
- Dziga Vertov's "Kino-Eye" manifesto realized—rejects narrative entirely in favor of pure cinema that reveals truths invisible to the naked eye
- Self-reflexive documentary shows the cameraman filming, the editor editing, and audiences watching, exposing the constructed nature of film itself
- Technical catalog of split screens, slow motion, freeze frames, superimposition, and stop-motion animation—a syllabus of what cameras can do
Compare: Potemkin vs. Man with a Movie Camera—both Soviet, both montage-driven, but Eisenstein uses editing to tell a story with emotional peaks while Vertov rejects story entirely for pure visual rhythm. Know the difference between narrative and non-narrative montage.
Documentary and the Ethics of Staging
The 1920s invented the feature documentary—and immediately raised questions about authenticity, staging, and whose stories get told that remain unresolved today.
Nanook of the North (1922)
- First feature-length documentary—Robert Flaherty lived with the Inuit for over a year, creating an intimate portrait that established documentary as viable theatrical form
- Staged authenticity is the film's central controversy: Nanook's "family" was assembled for the camera, and hunting scenes used outdated methods for dramatic effect
- Ethnographic gaze raises questions about who controls indigenous representation—Flaherty's romanticized "noble savage" framing influenced (and problematized) decades of documentary practice
Compare: Nanook vs. Man with a Movie Camera—both called documentaries, but Nanook stages scenes to capture a "disappearing" way of life while Vertov refuses staging entirely, showing urban life through pure observation. What does "documentary truth" mean? These films offer opposite answers.
The Art of Silent Comedy
Silent comedy demanded physical precision and visual storytelling that created meaning without words. These films prove that silence was never a limitation—it was a discipline.
Safety Last! (1923)
- Harold Lloyd's "glasses character"—an everyman striver whose ambition constantly exceeds his abilities, embodying aspirational middle-class anxiety
- The clock-hanging scene was filmed on actual buildings with real (if calculated) danger; the image became the icon of silent comedy's physical stakes
- Gag construction builds systematically—each floor of the climb introduces new obstacles, demonstrating escalating comic structure
The Gold Rush (1925)
- Chaplin's Tramp in the Klondike—blends slapstick with genuine pathos as the Little Tramp seeks fortune and love in brutal conditions
- Iconic set pieces include the cabin teetering on a cliff and the dance of the dinner rolls, showing Chaplin's ability to find poetry in objects
- Social commentary through comedy—hunger, isolation, and class difference are played for laughs that land because they hurt
Compare: Safety Last! vs. The Gold Rush—Lloyd's comedy is about striving upward (literally climbing), while Chaplin's is about surviving at the bottom. Both use physical comedy, but Lloyd creates suspense while Chaplin creates sympathy.
Spectacle and the Fantasy of Escape
Some 1920s films pushed production design and special effects to create immersive worlds that demonstrated cinema's unique capacity for visual wonder.
The Thief of Bagdad (1924)
- Douglas Fairbanks production with unprecedented scale—massive sets, thousands of extras, and innovative special effects including a flying carpet and magic rope
- Orientalist fantasy that established visual conventions for "exotic" adventure films, for better and worse influencing how Hollywood depicted the Middle East
- Star-driven spectacle proved audiences would pay for visual immersion and established the template for the blockbuster adventure film
The Big Parade (1925)
- First major WWI film to show combat's psychological toll rather than just its glory; soldiers bond, fight, and are destroyed with unprecedented realism
- King Vidor's direction balances intimate character work with large-scale battle sequences, proving war films could be both spectacular and humanist
- Commercial and critical success demonstrated that serious subject matter could draw mass audiences, paving the way for the prestige war film
Compare: Thief of Bagdad vs. The Big Parade—both large-scale spectacles, but one offers escape from reality while the other offers confrontation with reality. Both proved cinema could operate at epic scale; they just pointed that scale in opposite directions.
Cinematic Poetry: Visual Storytelling at Its Peak
By the late 1920s, silent film had achieved such sophistication that some filmmakers created works of pure visual poetry—films where every frame was composed like a painting and every cut carried emotional weight.
Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans (1927)
- F.W. Murnau's Hollywood debut—German Expressionist techniques applied to an American story, with elaborate tracking shots and forced-perspective sets
- City vs. country structures the entire film: the corrupting Woman from the City tempts a farmer to murder his innocent Wife, visualizing modernity's seductions
- First Academy Awards recognition (won "Unique and Artistic Picture")—the industry acknowledged this as silent cinema's artistic peak just as sound arrived
The Passion of Joan of Arc (1928)
- Carl Theodor Dreyer's masterpiece built almost entirely from close-ups of faces, particularly Maria Falconetti's Joan in what many consider the greatest film performance ever
- No makeup, low angles, white backgrounds create stark, almost abstract compositions that focus entirely on interior spiritual experience
- Emotional truth over historical accuracy—Dreyer compresses the trial into a single day, prioritizing psychological intensity over documentation
Compare: Sunrise vs. Passion of Joan of Arc—both late silent masterpieces, but Murnau uses elaborate camera movement and sets while Dreyer strips everything away except faces. One shows what the camera can do; the other shows what it can see.
The Avant-Garde: Cinema as Dream Logic
While mainstream cinema developed narrative conventions, avant-garde filmmakers rejected storytelling entirely, exploring film as pure visual experience or psychological provocation.
Un Chien Andalou (1929)
- Buñuel and Dalí's surrealist manifesto—images were chosen specifically because they couldn't be explained rationally (the sliced eyeball, ants emerging from a palm)
- Dream logic structure rejects cause-and-effect; scenes follow associative rather than narrative connections, influenced by Freudian ideas about the unconscious
- Intentionally shocking to provoke bourgeois audiences; Buñuel allegedly kept stones in his pockets at the premiere in case of riots
Compare: Un Chien Andalou vs. Man with a Movie Camera—both reject narrative, but Vertov believes film reveals objective truth while Buñuel believes it accesses subjective unconscious. Same rejection of story, opposite theories of what film is for.
The transition to synchronized sound wasn't just a technical upgrade—it was a complete industrial and aesthetic transformation that ended careers, created new genres, and changed what movies could be.
The Jazz Singer (1927)
- First feature with synchronized dialogue sequences—Al Jolson's ad-libbed "Wait a minute, you ain't heard nothin' yet!" became the moment cinema found its voice
- Vitaphone sound-on-disc system was technically primitive but commercially devastating; within two years, silent film production essentially ceased
- Blackface performance is the film's troubling center—Jolson's character achieves success by performing in blackface, embedding racial appropriation in sound cinema's origin story
Compare: The Jazz Singer vs. Sunrise (both 1927)—released the same year, one represents silent cinema's artistic peak, the other its commercial death sentence. The Academy gave Sunrise the art award and Jazz Singer a special award for innovation—Hollywood hedging its bets on which direction mattered more.
The Foundation: Where It All Started
The Birth of a Nation (1915)
- D.W. Griffith's technical innovations—cross-cutting between parallel actions, close-ups for emotional emphasis, and large-scale battle choreography established the grammar of narrative cinema
- Racist propaganda glorifying the Ku Klux Klan and depicting Black Americans (played by white actors in blackface) as threats to civilization; the film's technical brilliance is inseparable from its ideological poison
- Industry-shaping impact—proved feature films could be cultural events, inspired the formation of the NAACP's film protest movement, and forced the question: can formal innovation justify harmful content?
Compare: Birth of a Nation vs. Battleship Potemkin—both are propaganda films with revolutionary editing techniques. One argues for white supremacy, the other for workers' revolution. Both prove that cinema's formal power is never politically neutral.
Quick Reference Table
|
| German Expressionism | Caligari, Nosferatu, Metropolis |
| Soviet Montage | Battleship Potemkin, Man with a Movie Camera |
| Documentary Ethics | Nanook of the North, Man with a Movie Camera |
| Silent Comedy | Safety Last!, The Gold Rush |
| Visual Spectacle | Thief of Bagdad, The Big Parade, Metropolis |
| Late Silent Artistry | Sunrise, Passion of Joan of Arc |
| Avant-Garde/Surrealism | Un Chien Andalou |
| Sound Transition | The Jazz Singer |
Self-Check Questions
-
Which two films best demonstrate the difference between narrative montage and non-narrative montage, and what distinguishes their approaches to editing?
-
Both Nanook of the North and Man with a Movie Camera are considered documentaries. What fundamental disagreement about documentary truth do they represent?
-
If an FRQ asked you to discuss how German Expressionism influenced American genre filmmaking, which films would you cite and what specific visual techniques would you analyze?
-
Compare and contrast Sunrise and The Jazz Singer, both released in 1927. What does their simultaneous existence reveal about the state of cinema at that moment?
-
The Birth of a Nation and Battleship Potemkin are both technically innovative propaganda films. How would you discuss their formal achievements while addressing their ideological purposes?