Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Understanding AI's evolution isn't just tech history trivia—it's the foundation for grasping how modern business AI actually works. Each milestone you'll study represents a breakthrough in a specific capability: natural language processing, pattern recognition, strategic reasoning, or generative modeling. When you're analyzing AI implementation decisions in business cases, you're being tested on whether you can connect today's tools back to the underlying principles these breakthroughs established.
Don't just memorize dates and names. Know what capability each milestone unlocked and what limitations it revealed. The progression from rule-based systems to machine learning to deep learning to generative AI tells a story about how businesses moved from narrow automation to flexible, creative AI applications. That trajectory—and the trade-offs at each stage—is what exam questions will probe.
Before AI could transform business, researchers needed frameworks for understanding what "intelligent" machines even meant. These early milestones established the conceptual vocabulary and first practical demonstrations that shaped everything that followed.
Compare: Turing Test vs. ELIZA—both address human-machine conversation, but Turing proposed a theoretical benchmark while ELIZA provided practical demonstration. ELIZA proved machines could fool some users without actually passing the Turing Test, showing the gap between perceived and actual intelligence.
Expert systems encoded human knowledge into if-then rules, creating the first commercially viable AI applications. This approach dominated business AI for two decades and established patterns for how organizations capture and deploy specialized expertise.
Compare: ELIZA vs. Expert Systems—ELIZA mimicked conversation without domain knowledge, while expert systems encoded deep domain expertise without conversational ability. This split between interaction capability and reasoning capability persisted until modern LLMs merged both.
Games provided controlled environments to demonstrate AI's problem-solving power. These milestones captured public imagination and proved AI could match—then exceed—human strategic thinking, opening doors to business applications in optimization and decision support.
Compare: Deep Blue vs. AlphaGo—Deep Blue used brute-force search through programmed rules, while AlphaGo used self-taught neural networks. This represents the fundamental shift from rule-based to learning-based AI. If an exam asks about AI approaches to complex business problems, AlphaGo's reinforcement learning model is your modern example.
The 2010s saw neural networks finally deliver on decades of promise. Deep learning enabled machines to perceive and interpret unstructured data—images, speech, text—at scale, unlocking AI applications across every industry.
Compare: ImageNet vs. Watson—ImageNet advanced visual perception while Watson advanced language understanding. Both proved deep learning could handle unstructured data, but ImageNet's impact was more immediate because image recognition had clearer business applications with measurable accuracy metrics.
The latest wave of AI doesn't just classify or predict—it creates. Large language models and generative systems produce original content, fundamentally changing how businesses approach content creation, customer interaction, and creative work.
Compare: GPT-3 vs. ChatGPT—same underlying technology, but ChatGPT's conversational fine-tuning made the difference between a powerful tool for developers and a product for everyone. This illustrates how user experience design can be as important as technical capability in AI adoption.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Defining machine intelligence | Turing Test, ELIZA |
| Rule-based reasoning | Expert Systems |
| Strategic game-playing | Deep Blue, AlphaGo |
| Computer vision / perception | ImageNet breakthrough |
| Natural language understanding | IBM Watson, GPT-3 |
| Reinforcement learning | AlphaGo, ChatGPT (RLHF) |
| Generative AI | GPT-3, DALL-E, ChatGPT |
| Human-AI interaction design | ELIZA, ChatGPT |
Which two milestones both demonstrated natural language processing capabilities but revealed fundamentally different approaches—one using pattern matching and one using deep learning?
Compare and contrast Deep Blue and AlphaGo: What do they share as demonstrations of AI capability, and what fundamental difference in how they learned makes AlphaGo more relevant to modern business AI?
If a case study asks you to explain why businesses couldn't scale expert systems effectively, which limitation of 1970s-80s AI would you identify, and which later milestone addressed it?
The "ELIZA effect" describes users attributing understanding to machines that don't actually comprehend. How does this concept apply to businesses deploying ChatGPT for customer service today?
Arrange these milestones in order of their approach to learning: Expert Systems, AlphaGo, Deep Blue, GPT-3. Then explain what progression in AI capability this sequence represents.