Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Filtration media are the workhorses of separation processes, and understanding them means grasping why certain materials work for specific applications. You're being tested on more than just "what filters what"—exam questions probe the underlying mechanisms: surface vs. depth filtration, pore size selection, adsorption vs. mechanical sieving, and how material properties dictate performance under different conditions.
The key to mastering this topic is recognizing that each filtration medium operates on specific physical or chemical principles. A membrane and a bed of sand both "filter," but through entirely different mechanisms. When you encounter an FRQ asking you to select appropriate media for a given separation challenge, you need to connect material properties to separation requirements. Don't just memorize the list—know what mechanism each medium exploits and when that mechanism is your best option.
Surface filtration captures particles primarily on the outer face of the filter, creating a filter cake. The mechanism relies on pore openings smaller than the target particles, with efficiency determined by pore size distribution and uniformity.
Compare: Membranes vs. Ceramic Filters—both achieve fine particle removal through surface mechanisms, but ceramics offer superior thermal and chemical resistance while membranes provide tighter pore size control. If an FRQ involves high-temperature or corrosive process streams, ceramic is your answer; for precise molecular weight cutoffs, choose membranes.
Depth filters capture particles throughout the filter bed thickness, not just at the surface. Particles are trapped by a combination of interception, diffusion, and inertial impaction as fluid flows through tortuous paths.
Compare: Granular Media vs. Diatomaceous Earth—both provide depth filtration, but granular media handles high solids loads in continuous operations while diatomaceous earth excels at polishing applications requiring removal of fine particles and microorganisms. Granular beds regenerate by backwashing; DE requires periodic replacement.
These materials combine structural strength with controlled porosity, enabling operation under demanding pressure and temperature conditions. The rigid matrix maintains pore geometry under mechanical stress, unlike flexible media that can compress and alter filtration characteristics.
Compare: Sintered Metals vs. Glass Fiber Filters—both handle high temperatures, but sintered metals offer superior mechanical strength for high-pressure service while glass fibers provide better fine particle efficiency at lower cost. Choose sintered metals for process filtration; glass fibers for analytical and air quality applications.
Adsorptive media remove contaminants through chemical attraction to surface sites rather than mechanical sieving. The mechanism involves van der Waals forces, electrostatic attraction, or chemical bonding between contaminants and the media surface.
Compare: Activated Carbon vs. Cellulose Fibers—activated carbon excels at removing dissolved contaminants through adsorption, while cellulose primarily provides mechanical particle capture. For removing chlorine or organics from water, carbon is essential; for clarifying particulate-laden streams with minimal chemical contamination, cellulose suffices.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Surface filtration (cake formation) | Woven fabrics, Membranes, Ceramic filters |
| Depth filtration (tortuous path) | Nonwoven fabrics, Granular media, Diatomaceous earth |
| High-temperature service | Sintered metals, Ceramic filters, Glass fiber filters |
| High-pressure applications | Sintered metals, Ceramic filters |
| Adsorption mechanism | Activated carbon, Cellulose fibers (limited) |
| Fine particle/microbial removal | Membranes, Ceramic filters, Diatomaceous earth |
| Water treatment | Granular media, Activated carbon, Membranes |
| Disposable/single-use | Nonwoven fabrics, Cellulose fibers, Glass fiber filters |
Which two filtration media rely primarily on adsorption rather than mechanical sieving, and how do their applications differ?
A process stream at and requires fine particle removal. Compare the suitability of sintered metals versus glass fiber filters for this application.
Explain why diatomaceous earth and granular media are both classified as depth filters, yet are used in different applications. What operational factors drive the selection?
An FRQ asks you to design a multi-stage water treatment system. In what order would you arrange granular media, membranes, and activated carbon, and why does sequence matter?
Compare membranes and ceramic filters for pharmaceutical manufacturing. What property makes each advantageous, and under what conditions would you choose one over the other?