Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Thermodynamics is where energy conservation meets real-world applications—and the AP Physics 2 exam loves testing whether you understand how and why energy moves through systems. You're not just being tested on definitions; you're being tested on your ability to analyze PV diagrams, apply the first law (), and predict what happens to temperature, pressure, and volume when one variable is held constant. These processes form the foundation for understanding heat engines, refrigerators, and entropy—all fair game for both multiple choice and FRQs.
The key insight is that each thermodynamic process represents a constraint on the system: hold temperature constant, hold pressure constant, block heat transfer, or keep volume fixed. Each constraint produces different relationships between heat, work, and internal energy. Don't just memorize that "isothermal means constant temperature"—know that constant temperature means for an ideal gas, which forces . That's the level of reasoning that earns you points.
These processes define what stays fixed while the system changes. The constraint you impose determines how energy flows between heat and work.
Compare: Isothermal vs. Isochoric—both can involve heat transfer, but isothermal keeps (heat becomes work), while isochoric keeps (heat becomes internal energy). If an FRQ gives you a vertical line on a PV diagram, you know immediately that no work was done.
When a system can't exchange heat with its surroundings, all energy changes come from work alone. These processes are critical for understanding engine efficiency.
Compare: Adiabatic vs. Isentropic—all isentropic processes are adiabatic, but not all adiabatic processes are isentropic. Real-world adiabatic processes involve irreversibilities that increase entropy. The distinction matters when discussing why real engines can't reach Carnot efficiency.
Real applications involve sequences of processes that return the system to its starting point. The power of cycles is that internal energy resets, so net work equals net heat.
Compare: Heat engines vs. Refrigerators—both are cyclic processes, but engines extract work from heat flow (hot → cold), while refrigerators use work to force heat flow (cold → hot). FRQs often ask you to identify which direction energy flows and apply the appropriate efficiency formula.
These processes describe behavior that doesn't fit neatly into the idealized categories. Real gases and engineering applications often require more flexible models.
Compare: Adiabatic expansion vs. Throttling—both have , but adiabatic expansion does work (gas pushes a piston), while throttling does no useful work (gas expands freely through a valve). Throttling is irreversible and increases entropy.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| (no internal energy change) | Isothermal process, complete cycle |
| (no work done) | Isochoric process |
| (no heat transfer) | Adiabatic process, isentropic process, throttling |
| Constant pressure | Isobaric process |
| Maximum theoretical efficiency | Carnot cycle |
| Area enclosed = net work | Cyclic process |
| Real-world cooling mechanism | Throttling (Joule-Thomson effect) |
| Flexible model for real gases | Polytropic process |
For an ideal gas undergoing an isothermal expansion, why does ? What does this tell you about the relationship between heat input and work output?
Compare isochoric and adiabatic processes: which one has , and which has ? Explain why each relationship follows from the first law.
On a PV diagram, you see a closed loop traced clockwise. What can you immediately conclude about the net work and whether this represents a heat engine or refrigerator?
Why can no real heat engine exceed Carnot efficiency? Connect your answer to the second law of thermodynamics and entropy.
A gas undergoes throttling through a valve. Explain why this process is irreversible even though , and describe what happens to the entropy of the system.