Why This Matters
Middle English romances aren't just adventure stories—they're the medieval period's way of working through its biggest anxieties about identity, social order, loyalty, and what makes someone worthy of power. When you encounter these texts on an exam, you're being tested on your ability to recognize how narrative patterns reveal cultural values. The knight who faces a supernatural challenge, the prince raised as a commoner, the friendship tested by impossible circumstances—these aren't random plot devices. They're structured explorations of what medieval society believed about chivalric ideals, legitimate authority, and the tension between individual desire and social obligation.
As you study these romances, pay attention to the mechanisms each text uses to examine its central themes. Does it deploy supernatural elements to test a hero's character? Does it use disguise or hidden identity to question what makes someone noble? Understanding why a romance uses certain conventions matters far more than memorizing plot summaries. Don't just know what happens in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight—know what concept of honor it interrogates and how that compares to the treatment of honor in Amis and Amiloun.
Testing Chivalric Virtue Through Supernatural Challenge
Many romances use encounters with the supernatural as a kind of moral laboratory—the otherworldly threat strips away social pretense and reveals the knight's true character. These texts ask: what does honor actually mean when no one is watching, or when the stakes become impossibly high?
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight
- The beheading game tests Gawain's courage and honesty—the Green Knight's challenge forces Gawain to prove his reputation as Arthur's most virtuous knight through action, not just courtly performance
- The pentangle symbolizes interconnected virtues—Gawain's shield represents the five fives of knightly perfection, making his eventual failure a commentary on the impossibility of flawless chivalry
- The green girdle exposes the gap between ideal and reality—Gawain's choice to conceal the protective sash reveals how self-preservation conflicts with absolute honesty, a tension the poem treats with surprising sympathy
Sir Orfeo
- The Orpheus myth becomes a test of marital devotion—Sir Orfeo's descent into the fairy Otherworld transforms classical tragedy into a medieval exploration of love's power to transcend death
- Music functions as supernatural agency—Orfeo's harp gives him access to realms beyond human reach, suggesting that art itself possesses transformative, almost magical authority
- The happy ending revises classical fatalism—unlike Orpheus, Orfeo succeeds, reflecting medieval romance's investment in redemption and the restoration of proper order
Sir Launfal
- Fairy intervention rewards the unjustly marginalized knight—Launfal's fairy mistress provides wealth and love that Arthur's court denied him, creating a fantasy of supernatural justice
- The secrecy condition tests loyalty against social pressure—Launfal must keep his fairy lover secret, and his failure when Guinevere provokes him explores the impossible demands placed on courtly discretion
- Class critique operates through supernatural reward—the fairy's preference for Launfal over the corrupt court suggests that true nobility exists outside social hierarchies
Compare: Sir Gawain vs. Sir Launfal—both use supernatural encounters to test knightly virtue, but Gawain faces a test of honesty he partially fails, while Launfal faces a test of discretion he completely fails. If an FRQ asks about how romances critique chivalric ideals, these two offer contrasting models of sympathetic failure.
Identity, Lineage, and the Rightful Claim to Power
A recurring anxiety in Middle English romance concerns who deserves to rule and how that legitimacy becomes visible. These narratives often feature heroes whose noble identity is hidden or suppressed, only to be revealed through trials that prove their inherent worth.
Havelok the Dane
- The hidden prince narrative questions what makes kingship legitimate—Havelok is raised as a fisherman's son, yet his royal nature manifests through physical signs like the king-mark (a glowing light from his mouth)
- Supernatural markers confirm blood inheritance—the magical flame that identifies Havelok suggests that nobility is innate and cannot be fully suppressed by circumstance
- Justice requires restoration of proper hierarchy—the romance ends with Havelok reclaiming his throne, affirming that social order depends on rightful rulers occupying their destined positions
King Horn
- Exile and return structure the proof of noble identity—Horn's journey from dispossessed prince to triumphant king follows the exile-and-return pattern that defines many foundational romances
- Love and kingdom are intertwined rewards—Horn cannot marry Rymenhild until he reclaims his inheritance, linking romantic fulfillment to political legitimacy
- Disguise tests whether nobility transcends appearance—Horn's various disguises allow the narrative to ask whether those around him can recognize true worth beneath external markers
The Tale of Gamelyn
- Inheritance conflict exposes corruption in family structures—Gamelyn's elder brother cheats him of his birthright, framing the romance as a critique of primogeniture's potential for abuse
- Outlawry becomes a path to justice—Gamelyn joins forest outlaws, anticipating Robin Hood narratives and suggesting that legitimate authority can exist outside legal structures when those structures are corrupt
- Physical prowess proves moral worth—Gamelyn's strength and fighting ability serve as external signs of his inner nobility, a common romance convention
Compare: Havelok the Dane vs. The Tale of Gamelyn—both concern stolen inheritance and rightful claims to power, but Havelok's legitimacy is confirmed by supernatural signs, while Gamelyn must prove his worth through physical action and rebellion. This distinction reflects different attitudes toward how nobility becomes visible.
Loyalty, Friendship, and the Bonds Between Knights
Some romances focus less on individual quests than on relationships between men—friendships that must withstand betrayal, sacrifice, and competing obligations. These texts explore what loyalty actually requires and when it might demand the impossible.
Amis and Amiloun
- Identical appearance creates a test of substitution—the two knights look so alike that one can take the other's place, raising questions about individual identity versus interchangeable social roles
- Leprosy and child sacrifice test the limits of friendship—Amiloun contracts leprosy for Amis's sake, and Amis must sacrifice his children to cure him, pushing loyalty to extreme moral limits
- Divine intervention rewards impossible sacrifice—the children are miraculously restored, suggesting that God endorses the knights' radical commitment to each other
Ywain and Gawain
- Friendship and rivalry coexist in Arthurian brotherhood—Ywain and Gawain represent complementary models of knighthood, and their eventual combat (each unaware of the other's identity) dramatizes how chivalric obligations can conflict
- Ywain's madness results from broken promises—when Ywain fails to return to his wife on time, he loses his sanity, illustrating how personal relationships and knightly adventure exist in tension
- The lion companion symbolizes loyal service—Ywain's rescue of a lion, which then serves him faithfully, provides a model of the loyalty Ywain himself must learn to practice
Athelston
- Sworn brotherhood creates obligations that conflict with family—the four sworn brothers include a king, an archbishop, and a traitor, exploring how chosen bonds interact with blood ties and political power
- False accusation tests the justice system—the plot turns on treacherous lies and the question of how truth can be established when powerful people lie
- Trial by ordeal provides divine judgment—the romance uses judicial combat and ordeal to resolve questions that human judgment cannot settle, reflecting medieval legal culture
Compare: Amis and Amiloun vs. Athelston—both examine sworn brotherhood, but Amis and Amiloun presents friendship as an absolute good requiring any sacrifice, while Athelston shows how brotherhood can be corrupted by ambition. Use these together when discussing how romances idealize and complicate male bonds.
Love Across Boundaries: Class, Obligation, and Desire
Romances frequently explore what happens when love crosses social boundaries or conflicts with other duties. These narratives negotiate between individual desire and social structure, often using love as a lens for examining class mobility and personal merit.
The Squire of Low Degree
- Class difference creates the central obstacle to love—the squire's low birth means he must prove himself worthy of a princess through deeds, not lineage
- Seven years of adventure serve as proof of merit—the squire's long quest suggests that personal achievement can substitute for noble blood, a potentially radical social message
- The princess's constancy rewards patient devotion—her willingness to wait (and her mistaken belief that she keeps the squire's dead body) emphasizes female fidelity as a romance ideal
King Horn (revisited for love theme)
- Rymenhild's agency drives the romance plot—unlike passive romance heroines, Rymenhild actively pursues Horn and initiates their relationship
- Love tokens enable recognition across disguise—the ring Rymenhild gives Horn becomes crucial for identification, showing how material objects carry relational meaning
- Marriage requires political as well as personal readiness—Horn cannot marry until he has a kingdom to offer, linking romantic fulfillment to masculine achievement
Compare: The Squire of Low Degree vs. Sir Launfal—both feature love that crosses status boundaries, but the squire must earn his way up through merit, while Launfal is elevated by supernatural intervention. These represent different fantasy solutions to the problem of desire versus social hierarchy.
Quick Reference Table
|
| Supernatural testing of virtue | Sir Gawain, Sir Orfeo, Sir Launfal |
| Hidden identity / rightful inheritance | Havelok the Dane, King Horn, The Tale of Gamelyn |
| Male friendship and loyalty | Amis and Amiloun, Ywain and Gawain, Athelston |
| Love across class boundaries | The Squire of Low Degree, King Horn, Sir Launfal |
| Critique of chivalric ideals | Sir Gawain, Ywain and Gawain |
| Supernatural / fairy Otherworld | Sir Gawain, Sir Orfeo, Sir Launfal, Havelok |
| Justice and social order | Havelok, The Tale of Gamelyn, Athelston |
| Exile-and-return narrative pattern | King Horn, Havelok the Dane, Sir Orfeo |
Self-Check Questions
-
Which two romances use the hidden prince motif, and how do they differ in how the hero's true identity becomes known?
-
Compare the role of supernatural intervention in Sir Launfal and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. In one, the supernatural rewards the hero; in the other, it tests him. What does this difference reveal about each text's attitude toward chivalric virtue?
-
If an FRQ asked you to discuss how Middle English romances explore the limits of loyalty, which two texts would you choose, and what specific plot elements would you analyze?
-
Both The Tale of Gamelyn and Athelston involve betrayal within families. How does each romance resolve this betrayal, and what does the resolution suggest about medieval attitudes toward justice?
-
Identify a romance that critiques the gap between chivalric ideals and human reality. What specific narrative device does it use to expose this gap, and how does the text treat the hero's failure—with condemnation or sympathy?