Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Symbolism wasn't just an art movement—it was a deliberate rebellion against the rational, observable world that Realism and Impressionism celebrated. When you're studying these artists, you're being tested on your ability to recognize how subjective experience, mythology, dreams, and psychological states became legitimate artistic subjects. The exam wants you to understand that Symbolists believed art should evoke emotion and mystery rather than document reality, and each artist on this list demonstrates a different approach to that core principle.
Don't just memorize names and famous works. Know what concept each artist illustrates: Who explored the subconscious? Who drew from classical mythology? Who pushed into themes of death and sexuality that challenged Victorian norms? Understanding these categories will help you tackle comparison questions and FRQs that ask you to analyze how different artists approached similar themes through symbolic visual language.
These artists mined ancient myths and allegories not for historical accuracy, but as symbolic frameworks for exploring universal human experiences—love, death, fate, and transcendence.
Compare: Moreau vs. Puvis de Chavannes—both drew from classical sources, but Moreau's work is dense, jeweled, and emotionally intense while Puvis created calm, simplified, almost muted compositions. If an FRQ asks about different Symbolist approaches to mythology, these two represent opposite poles.
These artists turned inward, using fantastical imagery and dreamlike distortion to visualize psychological states that couldn't be photographed or rationally explained.
Compare: Redon vs. Khnopff—both explored inner psychological states, but Redon embraced fantastical, often grotesque imagery while Khnopff maintained a cool, polished realism that makes his work feel eerily detached. This contrast illustrates how Symbolists used radically different visual strategies to access the subconscious.
These artists confronted anxiety, mortality, and raw emotional experience directly, using distorted color and form to externalize internal turmoil.
Compare: Munch vs. Delville—both addressed profound existential questions, but Munch depicted anguish and psychological breakdown while Delville sought transcendence and spiritual idealism. This contrast shows Symbolism's range from dark introspection to mystical aspiration.
These artists used symbolic imagery to explore eroticism, temptation, and the darker aspects of human desire—subjects that challenged bourgeois Victorian morality.
Compare: Klimt vs. Rops—both explored sexuality, but Klimt aestheticized desire through decorative beauty and gold leaf while Rops confronted viewers with deliberately disturbing, satirical imagery linking eroticism to death. An FRQ might ask how Symbolists approached taboo subjects differently.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Mythology as psychological symbol | Moreau, Böcklin, Puvis de Chavannes |
| Dreams and the subconscious | Redon, Khnopff |
| Existential anxiety and emotion | Munch |
| Spiritual transcendence | Delville, Puvis de Chavannes |
| Sexuality and transgression | Klimt, Rops, Stuck |
| Death and the macabre | Böcklin, Rops, Munch |
| Decorative/Art Nouveau integration | Klimt, Moreau |
| Influence on later movements | Moreau (Fauvism), Munch (Expressionism), Redon (Surrealism) |
Which two artists both explored mythology but used radically different visual approaches—one ornate and jeweled, the other pale and simplified? What does this contrast reveal about Symbolism's range?
If an FRQ asks you to discuss how Symbolists visualized the subconscious, which artists would you choose, and how do their techniques differ?
Compare how Klimt and Rops approached themes of sexuality. What does each artist's style suggest about their attitude toward desire and transgression?
Which artist's work most directly anticipates Surrealism, and what specific visual strategies connect them to that later movement?
Munch and Delville both addressed existential questions about human existence. How do their conclusions—and their visual languages—differ? What does this tell you about Symbolism's philosophical diversity?