upgrade
upgrade

⚗️Analytical Chemistry

Key Spectroscopic Techniques

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Spectroscopy is the backbone of analytical chemistry—it's how we answer the fundamental questions of what's in this sample? and how much is there? You're being tested not just on knowing that UV-Vis measures absorbance or that NMR detects nuclear spin, but on understanding which technique solves which analytical problem. Exams love to present you with an unknown sample scenario and ask you to justify your method selection, so you need to think like an analyst, not a memorizer.

These techniques divide neatly by what they probe: electronic transitions, molecular vibrations, nuclear environments, or mass-to-charge ratios. Each approach reveals different structural information and has distinct sensitivity and selectivity trade-offs. Don't just memorize instrument names—know what physical phenomenon each technique exploits and when you'd reach for one over another.


Electronic Transition Techniques

These methods probe how electrons move between energy levels when molecules absorb or emit light. The energy gap between electronic states determines which wavelengths interact with your sample.

UV-Visible Spectroscopy

  • Measures electronic transitions—electrons jumping between bonding, nonbonding, and antibonding orbitals when absorbing UV or visible light (190–800 nm)
  • Beer-Lambert Law (A=εbcA = \varepsilon bc) enables quantitative analysis by relating absorbance to concentration, path length, and molar absorptivity
  • Best for conjugated systems and transition metals—the more extended the conjugation, the longer the wavelength absorbed (chromophores are your target functional groups)

Fluorescence Spectroscopy

  • Detects photon emission after excitation—molecules absorb light, then release lower-energy photons as electrons return to ground state (Stokes shift describes this energy difference)
  • Extremely sensitive (detection limits often in nanomolar range), making it ideal for trace biomolecule detection
  • Requires fluorophores—not all molecules fluoresce, but those that do provide exceptional selectivity for biological imaging and diagnostics

Compare: UV-Vis vs. Fluorescence—both probe electronic transitions, but UV-Vis measures absorption while fluorescence measures emission. Fluorescence offers 100–1000× greater sensitivity but requires your analyte to be fluorescent. If an FRQ asks about detecting trace concentrations of a fluorescent compound, fluorescence wins every time.


Vibrational Spectroscopy Techniques

These methods detect molecular vibrations—stretching, bending, and rotating of chemical bonds. Different functional groups vibrate at characteristic frequencies, creating a molecular fingerprint.

Infrared (IR) Spectroscopy

  • Probes bond vibrations through IR absorption—functional groups like C=O\text{C=O}, O-H\text{O-H}, and N-H\text{N-H} appear at predictable wavenumbers in the 4000–400 cm1\text{cm}^{-1} range
  • Requires a change in dipole moment—symmetric vibrations that don't alter dipole moment are IR-inactive (this is a classic exam distinction)
  • Fingerprint region (1500–400 cm1\text{cm}^{-1}) provides unique patterns for compound identification, even when functional groups are identical

Raman Spectroscopy

  • Uses inelastic light scattering—monochromatic light interacts with molecular vibrations, and the scattered light shifts in frequency (Stokes and anti-Stokes shifts)
  • Requires a change in polarizability—symmetric vibrations that are IR-inactive are often Raman-active, making these techniques complementary
  • Non-destructive and versatile—analyzes solids, liquids, and gases without sample preparation; water doesn't interfere (unlike IR)

Compare: IR vs. Raman—both reveal vibrational information, but they follow different selection rules. Symmetric stretches (like C=C\text{C=C} in alkenes) are Raman-active but IR-inactive. Use IR for polar bonds with strong dipole changes; use Raman for aqueous samples or symmetric molecules.


Nuclear and Magnetic Techniques

NMR exploits the quantum mechanical property of nuclear spin to reveal atomic environments and molecular connectivity. Nuclei in magnetic fields absorb radiofrequency radiation at frequencies determined by their chemical environment.

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy

  • Detects magnetically active nuclei (1H^1\text{H}, 13C^{13}\text{C}, 31P^{31}\text{P}) by measuring radiofrequency absorption in a strong magnetic field
  • Chemical shift (δ\delta, in ppm) reveals electronic environment—shielded nuclei resonate upfield, deshielded nuclei resonate downfield
  • Splitting patterns and integration—coupling constants (JJ) reveal connectivity between nuclei; peak integration gives relative proton counts

Compare: NMR vs. IR—both provide structural information, but NMR reveals atom connectivity and environment while IR identifies functional groups. For determining whether you have an aldehyde vs. ketone, IR shows C=O\text{C=O} stretch in both, but NMR distinguishes them by the aldehyde proton signal around 9–10 ppm.


Mass Analysis Techniques

Mass spectrometry separates ions by their mass-to-charge ratio, providing molecular weight and structural fragmentation data. Ionization creates charged species that are sorted by their response to electric and magnetic fields.

Mass Spectrometry (MS)

  • Measures m/zm/z ratio—ionized molecules are separated based on mass-to-charge ratio, with the molecular ion peak giving molecular weight
  • Fragmentation patterns reveal structure—bonds break predictably, creating diagnostic fragment ions (look for loss of 15 for CH3\text{CH}_3, 29 for CHO\text{CHO}, 45 for OC2H5\text{OC}_2\text{H}_5)
  • Hyphenated techniques (GC-MS, LC-MS) combine separation with identification, making MS essential for proteomics, metabolomics, and forensics

Compare: MS vs. NMR for structure determination—MS gives molecular weight and fragmentation clues quickly, while NMR provides detailed connectivity. For unknowns, MS tells you what mass you're dealing with; NMR tells you how atoms are arranged. Most structure elucidation problems require both.


Atomic Spectroscopy Techniques

These methods analyze elemental composition by exciting or absorbing light at the atomic level. Atoms have discrete energy levels, so each element produces characteristic spectral lines.

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS)

  • Measures light absorption by ground-state atoms—sample is atomized (usually by flame or graphite furnace), and element-specific hollow cathode lamps provide the light source
  • Highly selective and sensitive—detection limits reach ppb levels for many metals, with minimal spectral interference between elements
  • Single-element technique—each lamp measures one element, making AAS slower than multi-element methods but exceptionally reliable for trace metal analysis

Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (AES)

  • Measures light emitted by excited atoms—thermal energy (plasma, flame, or arc) excites atoms, which emit characteristic wavelengths as they relax
  • Multi-element capability—ICP-AES (inductively coupled plasma) can analyze 20+ elements simultaneously with excellent sensitivity
  • Complementary to AAS—emission works better for elements with low excitation energies; absorption works better for elements that don't emit strongly

Compare: AAS vs. AES—absorption measures what's taken in, emission measures what's given off. AAS offers superior sensitivity for single elements; AES (especially ICP-AES) provides faster multi-element screening. For regulatory testing of one specific metal, choose AAS; for comprehensive elemental surveys, choose ICP-AES.


X-ray and Advanced Techniques

X-ray methods probe deeper into atomic structure, revealing elemental composition and crystalline arrangements through high-energy radiation interactions.

X-ray Spectroscopy

  • X-ray fluorescence (XRF) measures characteristic X-rays emitted when inner-shell electrons are ejected and outer electrons fill the vacancy—provides rapid elemental analysis
  • X-ray diffraction (XRD) exploits Bragg's Law (nλ=2dsinθn\lambda = 2d\sin\theta) to determine crystal structure and phase identification from diffraction patterns
  • Non-destructive and versatile—used in materials science, geology, archaeology, and forensics for bulk elemental and structural analysis

Fourier Transform Spectroscopy

  • Mathematical enhancement technique—uses Fourier transform algorithms to convert interferogram data (time domain) into spectra (frequency domain)
  • Multiplexing advantage—all wavelengths measured simultaneously, dramatically improving signal-to-noise ratio and scan speed
  • Applied across spectroscopy—FT-IR and FT-NMR are now standard; the technique itself isn't a separate spectroscopy but an instrumental improvement

Compare: XRF vs. AAS for elemental analysis—XRF is non-destructive and requires minimal sample prep but has higher detection limits. AAS destroys the sample but reaches ppb sensitivity. For precious artifacts, use XRF; for trace contamination analysis, use AAS.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Electronic transitionsUV-Vis, Fluorescence
Molecular vibrationsIR, Raman
Nuclear environmentsNMR
Mass-to-charge separationMS
Atomic absorption/emissionAAS, AES
Elemental compositionXRF, AAS, ICP-AES
Structural elucidationNMR, MS, IR
Trace analysis (high sensitivity)Fluorescence, AAS, MS
Non-destructive analysisRaman, XRF, XRD
Quantitative analysisUV-Vis (Beer-Lambert), AAS, MS

Self-Check Questions

  1. Which two vibrational spectroscopy techniques have complementary selection rules, and what determines whether a vibration is active in each?

  2. You need to identify an unknown organic compound's functional groups AND determine how many equivalent protons it contains. Which two techniques would you use, and what specific information does each provide?

  3. Compare AAS and ICP-AES: under what analytical scenario would you choose each, and why?

  4. A sample contains a fluorescent compound at nanomolar concentration. Why would fluorescence spectroscopy outperform UV-Vis for this analysis, even though both probe electronic transitions?

  5. An FRQ asks you to propose a method for determining both the molecular weight and the carbon-hydrogen framework of an unknown organic molecule. Outline which techniques you'd use and what each contributes to solving the structure.