upgrade
upgrade

🔒Deviance and Social Control

Key Sociological Theories of Deviance

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

When you encounter questions about deviance on your exam, you're not just being tested on definitions—you're being asked to explain why people break rules and how society responds. These theories represent fundamentally different assumptions about human nature and social order. Some assume people are naturally conformist and need to be pushed toward deviance; others assume people are naturally self-interested and need to be pulled toward conformity. Understanding this distinction is the key to comparing theories effectively.

Each theory also implies different policy solutions to deviance. If deviance is learned, we should change peer environments. If it results from blocked opportunities, we should expand access to legitimate means. If it comes from labeling, we should be more cautious about who we criminalize. Don't just memorize what each theory says—know what concept each illustrates and what it suggests we should do about deviance.


Structural Theories: Society Creates the Conditions for Deviance

These theories locate the cause of deviance in social structures rather than individual pathology. The key insight: when society is organized in certain ways, deviance becomes a predictable outcome.

Strain Theory

  • Merton's five adaptations—conformity, innovation, ritualism, retreatism, and rebellion—describe how people respond when cultural goals and institutional means don't align
  • Innovation is the classic criminal adaptation: accepting society's success goals but using illegitimate means (think: drug dealing as entrepreneurship)
  • Structural inequality drives strain; this theory explains why deviance concentrates in disadvantaged communities facing blocked opportunities

Anomie Theory

  • Durkheim's concept of normlessness—anomie occurs when social norms break down, leaving individuals without clear guidance for behavior
  • Rapid social change triggers anomie; periods of economic boom or bust, migration, or cultural upheaval create normative confusion
  • Suicide rates were Durkheim's evidence; he showed that weakened social integration correlates with self-destructive behavior

Social Disorganization Theory

  • Neighborhood characteristics—not individual traits—predict crime rates in this ecological approach developed by the Chicago School
  • Residential instability, poverty, and ethnic heterogeneity weaken informal social controls and community cohesion
  • Concentric zone model showed crime concentrated in transitional urban areas regardless of which ethnic groups lived there (the place, not the people)

Compare: Strain Theory vs. Anomie Theory—both identify structural conditions that produce deviance, but strain focuses on goal-means discrepancy while anomie emphasizes normative breakdown. On an FRQ, strain explains property crime better; anomie explains suicide and addiction.


Learning Theories: Deviance Is Taught and Reinforced

These theories reject the idea that deviance is pathological. Instead, deviant behavior is learned the same way conforming behavior is learned—through social interaction and reinforcement.

Differential Association Theory

  • Sutherland's core claim—criminal behavior is learned through intimate personal groups, not media or casual contact
  • Frequency, duration, priority, and intensity of associations determine influence; early, close, and repeated exposure matters most
  • Definitions favorable to law violation must exceed definitions unfavorable; it's about the balance of messages received

Social Learning Theory

  • Bandura's expansion adds reinforcement and imitation to the learning process—we don't just absorb norms, we observe consequences
  • Differential reinforcement explains persistence: behaviors that are rewarded (or not punished) continue; those that are punished decrease
  • Modeling matters; observing others succeed through deviance teaches that such behavior is effective and acceptable

Compare: Differential Association vs. Social Learning Theory—both emphasize learned deviance, but differential association focuses on transmitted definitions while social learning adds observation and reinforcement mechanisms. Social learning theory explains why some exposed individuals don't become deviant (they saw negative consequences).


Control Theories: What Prevents Deviance?

These theories flip the question. Instead of asking "why do people deviate?" they ask "why do most people conform?" The answer: social bonds constrain behavior.

Control Theory

  • Hirschi's four bonds—attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief—tie individuals to conventional society and raise the cost of deviance
  • Attachment to others creates stakes in conformity; we don't want to disappoint people we care about
  • Weak bonds predict delinquency; this explains why family disruption and school disconnection correlate with youth crime

Rational Choice Theory

  • Cost-benefit calculation—individuals weigh potential rewards against risks of detection and punishment before acting
  • Deterrence logic follows directly: increase certainty and severity of punishment to tip the calculation toward conformity
  • Situational crime prevention applies this theory; make deviance harder and less rewarding through environmental design

Compare: Control Theory vs. Rational Choice Theory—both assume people need reasons not to deviate, but control theory emphasizes social bonds while rational choice emphasizes calculated self-interest. Control theory better explains why some people never consider crime; rational choice better explains why offenders choose specific targets.


Labeling and Power: Society Creates Deviants

These theories shift focus from the act to the reaction. Deviance isn't inherent in behavior—it's created through social definitions and power dynamics.

Labeling Theory

  • Primary vs. secondary deviance—initial rule-breaking (primary) becomes a master status only after societal reaction (secondary)
  • Self-fulfilling prophecy occurs when labeled individuals internalize the deviant identity and act accordingly
  • Power determines labels; the same behavior may be criminalized or excused depending on who does it (think: crack vs. powder cocaine sentencing)

Conflict Theory

  • Laws reflect ruling class interests—what counts as deviance is defined by those with power to make and enforce rules
  • Criminalization of poverty illustrates this; vagrancy laws, loitering ordinances, and property crimes are policed more heavily than white-collar crime
  • Race, class, and gender shape who gets labeled deviant; the theory explains disparities in arrest, prosecution, and sentencing

Compare: Labeling Theory vs. Conflict Theory—both emphasize power in defining deviance, but labeling theory focuses on micro-level interactions and identity transformation while conflict theory emphasizes macro-level inequality and class interests. Use labeling for questions about individual trajectories; use conflict for questions about systemic bias.


Functionalist Perspective: Deviance Serves Society

This perspective asks a counterintuitive question: if deviance is harmful, why does every society have it? The answer: deviance performs necessary social functions.

Functionalist Theory

  • Durkheim argued deviance is normal—it exists in all societies because it serves essential functions, not because social control fails
  • Boundary maintenance clarifies norms; punishing deviants reminds everyone what the rules are and strengthens collective conscience
  • Social change often begins as deviance; today's criminal may be tomorrow's hero (think: civil rights protesters)

Compare: Functionalist Theory vs. Conflict Theory—both are macro-level perspectives, but functionalism sees deviance as serving society's needs while conflict theory sees it as reflecting power struggles. Functionalism assumes consensus about norms; conflict theory assumes norms benefit some groups over others.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Structure causes devianceStrain Theory, Anomie Theory, Social Disorganization Theory
Deviance is learnedDifferential Association Theory, Social Learning Theory
Bonds prevent devianceControl Theory, Rational Choice Theory
Labels create deviantsLabeling Theory, Conflict Theory
Deviance serves functionsFunctionalist Theory
Emphasizes power/inequalityConflict Theory, Labeling Theory
Micro-level focusLabeling Theory, Social Learning Theory, Differential Association Theory
Macro-level focusFunctionalist Theory, Conflict Theory, Anomie Theory

Self-Check Questions

  1. Which two theories both emphasize that deviance is learned through social interaction, and what distinguishes their explanations of how learning occurs?

  2. A student from a low-income neighborhood turns to drug dealing after being unable to find legitimate employment. Which theory best explains this, and which of Merton's five adaptations does it represent?

  3. Compare and contrast Control Theory and Labeling Theory: one asks why people conform, the other examines what happens after rule-breaking. How do their assumptions about human nature differ?

  4. An FRQ asks you to explain why crime rates are higher in some neighborhoods than others without blaming individual residents. Which theory provides the best framework, and what three neighborhood characteristics would you cite?

  5. How would a functionalist and a conflict theorist disagree about the purpose of criminal law? Use a specific example (such as drug laws or property crime) to illustrate the contrast.