Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Puritan literature isn't just a collection of old religious texts—it's the foundation of American literary identity. When you're tested on this material, you're being asked to understand how these authors established enduring themes: the tension between individual conscience and community obligation, the belief in America as a divinely ordained project, and the struggle to reconcile human experience with theological doctrine. These writers created the first distinctly American voice, one that echoes through Hawthorne, Melville, Emerson, and beyond.
Don't just memorize names and titles. Know what each author reveals about Puritan worldview: Bradford and Winthrop established the communal vision; Bradstreet and Taylor explored private devotion; Edwards and Wigglesworth dramatized salvation anxiety; Rowlandson created the captivity narrative genre. When an essay prompt asks you to analyze Puritan literature, you're being tested on your ability to connect individual works to these larger cultural and theological currents.
These authors articulated the foundational myth of American exceptionalism—the idea that the colonial project was divinely sanctioned and that settlers bore collective responsibility for its success. Their works function as both historical record and theological argument.
Compare: Bradford vs. Winthrop—both articulate providential history and communal responsibility, but Bradford writes retrospectively as historian while Winthrop writes prospectively as visionary. If an FRQ asks about Puritan community ideals, Winthrop's sermon is your go-to primary source.
While public sermons shaped community life, these poets explored the interior landscape of Puritan faith. Their work reveals the personal cost of maintaining spiritual vigilance and the surprising range of emotion within Puritan devotional practice.
Compare: Bradstreet vs. Taylor—both use poetry for devotional purposes, but Bradstreet's work entered public discourse while Taylor's remained private. Bradstreet grapples openly with doubt and worldly attachment; Taylor's meditations are more consistently focused on preparing the soul for divine encounter.
These authors confronted their audiences with the terrifying stakes of Puritan theology: eternal damnation was real, imminent, and avoidable only through genuine conversion. Their rhetorical strategies—vivid imagery, emotional intensity, apocalyptic framing—aimed to shake listeners out of spiritual complacency.
Compare: Edwards vs. Wigglesworth—both use fear as spiritual motivation, but Wigglesworth writes in accessible verse for broad audiences while Edwards crafts sophisticated prose sermons. Edwards represents the Great Awakening's emotional intensity; Wigglesworth represents earlier, more systematic Puritan didacticism.
These figures wielded influence through institutional positions—as ministers, college presidents, and public intellectuals. Their writings address not just individual salvation but the governance of churches, the nature of evil, and the relationship between faith and reason.
Compare: Cotton Mather vs. Increase Mather—father and son both addressed witchcraft, but Increase's work actually urged judicial caution while Cotton's has been more associated with prosecutorial zeal. This distinction matters for understanding the range of Puritan responses to the Salem crisis.
Mary Rowlandson's account established a distinctly American genre that would influence literature for centuries. The captivity narrative combines adventure, spiritual autobiography, and cultural encounter, using the structure of trial and deliverance to reinforce Puritan theology.
Compare: Rowlandson vs. Bradford—both interpret hardship as divine testing, but Rowlandson's narrative is intensely personal while Bradford's is communal history. Rowlandson's genre (captivity narrative) influenced American literature through Cooper, Sedgwick, and beyond.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Providential history | Bradford, Winthrop, Rowlandson |
| "City upon a hill" / American exceptionalism | Winthrop |
| Devotional poetry | Bradstreet, Taylor |
| Great Awakening / emotional revivalism | Edwards |
| Salvation anxiety / Last Judgment | Edwards, Wigglesworth |
| Captivity narrative genre | Rowlandson |
| Institutional Puritan authority | Cotton Mather, Increase Mather, Shepard |
| Women's voices in colonial literature | Bradstreet, Rowlandson |
Which two authors best represent the tension between public community vision and private devotional practice in Puritan literature? What distinguishes their approaches?
How do Edwards and Wigglesworth both use fear as a rhetorical strategy, and what key differences in style and audience separate their works?
Compare Bradstreet and Rowlandson as female voices in Puritan literature. What genres do they work in, and how do their works address women's experience differently?
If an FRQ asked you to analyze how Puritan authors interpreted hardship as divine providence, which three authors would provide the strongest evidence, and why?
Explain the difference between Cotton Mather's and Increase Mather's positions on the Salem witch trials. Why does this distinction matter for understanding the range of Puritan thought?