Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Understanding psychology's major theorists isn't just about memorizing names and dates—it's about grasping the fundamental debates that define the field. You're being tested on how these thinkers answered the big questions: What drives human behavior? How do we learn? What shapes personality? How much does environment matter versus biology? Each theorist represents a different perspective, and the AP exam loves asking you to compare their approaches or apply their concepts to novel scenarios.
These theorists also demonstrate how psychology evolved as a science. From Wundt's first laboratory to modern cognitive-behavioral approaches, you'll see shifts from introspection to behaviorism to cognition—and the exam expects you to know why those shifts happened. Don't just memorize what each person believed; understand which psychological perspective they represent and how their ideas connect to the broader curriculum. That's what earns you points on FRQs.
Psychology had to establish itself as a science separate from philosophy. These pioneers created the methods and frameworks that made modern psychology possible.
Compare: Wundt vs. James—both founded psychology as a discipline, but Wundt asked "what are the structures of consciousness?" while James asked "what are the functions of mental processes?" If an FRQ asks about early schools of psychology, contrast structuralism's focus on elements with functionalism's focus on purpose.
Behaviorists revolutionized psychology by insisting that only observable behavior—not internal mental states—could be studied scientifically. Their core principle: behavior is shaped by environmental consequences.
Compare: Pavlov vs. Skinner—both studied learning, but Pavlov focused on involuntary responses to stimuli (classical conditioning) while Skinner focused on voluntary behaviors shaped by consequences (operant conditioning). The AP exam frequently asks you to identify which type of conditioning is operating in a scenario.
Compare: Skinner vs. Bandura—Skinner required direct reinforcement for learning, while Bandura showed learning occurs through observation alone. This challenged strict behaviorism and opened the door to cognitive approaches.
These psychologists mapped how humans change across the lifespan. Their shared insight: development follows predictable stages, though they disagreed on what drives progression.
Compare: Piaget vs. Erikson—Piaget focused on cognitive development (how we think), while Erikson focused on psychosocial development (how we relate to others and form identity). Both used stage theories, but Erikson's extends across the entire lifespan.
Freud's psychoanalytic approach dominated early personality theory, proposing that unconscious forces drive behavior. His influence persists even as many of his specific claims have been challenged.
Compare: Freud vs. Erikson—both proposed developmental stages, but Freud emphasized psychosexual conflicts driven by biological urges while Erikson emphasized psychosocial conflicts shaped by social relationships. Erikson was neo-Freudian, building on but modifying Freud's ideas.
Humanistic psychologists rejected both behaviorism's environmental determinism and psychoanalysis's focus on dysfunction. Their core belief: humans are inherently good and motivated toward growth.
Compare: Maslow vs. Rogers—both humanistic psychologists emphasizing growth and potential, but Maslow focused on motivation (hierarchy of needs) while Rogers focused on therapy and self-concept. Both appear in questions about the humanistic perspective.
Cognitive psychologists brought mental processes back into scientific psychology, while clinical researchers developed evidence-based treatments.
Compare: Beck vs. Freud—both focused on treating psychological disorders, but Freud emphasized unconscious conflicts requiring lengthy analysis while Beck targeted conscious thought patterns with structured, shorter-term interventions.
Social psychologists study how situations and social contexts influence behavior. Their key insight: the power of the situation often overrides individual personality traits.
Compare: Milgram vs. Zimbardo—both demonstrated situational power over behavior, but Milgram studied obedience to authority while Zimbardo studied effects of social roles. Both are essential examples for questions about social influence and ethics in research.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Learning/Conditioning | Pavlov (classical), Skinner (operant), Watson (behaviorism), Bandura (observational) |
| Developmental Stages | Piaget (cognitive), Erikson (psychosocial), Freud (psychosexual) |
| Humanistic Psychology | Maslow (hierarchy of needs), Rogers (client-centered therapy) |
| Founding the Discipline | Wundt (structuralism), James (functionalism) |
| Social Influence | Milgram (obedience), Zimbardo (roles/situations) |
| Cognitive/Clinical | Beck (cognitive therapy), Loftus (memory) |
| Unconscious/Personality | Freud (psychoanalysis) |
Both Piaget and Erikson proposed stage theories of development. What is the key difference in what each theorist believed developed through stages?
A child watches an older sibling get praised for sharing toys, then begins sharing more often. Which theorist's work best explains this, and how does it differ from Skinner's operant conditioning?
Compare the approaches of Freud and Beck to treating psychological disorders. How do their assumptions about the source of problems differ?
Milgram and Zimbardo both conducted studies with significant ethical concerns. What common conclusion about human behavior did their research support, and how might you use both studies to answer an FRQ about situational influences on behavior?
A therapist tells a client, "I accept you completely as you are, and I believe you have the capacity to grow." Which theorist's approach does this reflect, and what key concepts from their theory are being applied?