Key Properties of Thermoplastic Polymers

Why This Matters

Thermoplastic polymers represent one of the most commercially important classes of materials you'll encounter in polymer chemistry, and understanding their properties connects directly to core concepts like intermolecular forces, crystallinity, glass transition temperature, and structure-property relationships. When you're asked about why one polymer works for beverage bottles while another excels in bulletproof glass, you're really being tested on how molecular structure—chain branching, polarity, hydrogen bonding, and backbone rigidity—translates into macroscopic behavior.

These materials also illustrate the fundamental distinction between thermoplastics and thermosets: thermoplastics can be repeatedly melted and reshaped because their polymer chains are held together by secondary forces rather than covalent crosslinks. This processability makes them ubiquitous in manufacturing, but it also means their thermal and mechanical limits depend entirely on those weaker interactions. Don't just memorize melting points and applications—know what structural feature gives each polymer its signature properties, because that's what FRQs will probe.

---

Crystallinity and Chain Structure

The degree of crystallinity in a thermoplastic directly controls its density, stiffness, and thermal behavior. Linear chains pack efficiently into crystalline regions, while branching disrupts packing and creates amorphous domains.

Polyethylene (PE)

• Simplest hydrocarbon backbone $\text{—(CH}_2\text{—CH}_2\text{)}_n\text{—}$—the degree of branching determines whether you get LDPE (low density, flexible) or HDPE (high density, rigid)
• High crystallinity in HDPE creates excellent chemical resistance and moisture barrier properties due to tightly packed chains
• Low polarity means PE cannot hydrogen bond, limiting its use where adhesion or polar solvent resistance matters

Polypropylene (PP)

• Methyl side groups create steric effects that influence chain packing—isotactic PP achieves high crystallinity while atactic PP remains amorphous
• Higher melting point than PE ($\sim$160°C vs. $\sim$130°C) due to restricted chain mobility from the methyl substituent
• Excellent fatigue resistance makes it ideal for living hinges—a direct consequence of its semicrystalline structure allowing controlled deformation

Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)

• Aromatic rings in the backbone increase chain stiffness and raise both $T_g$ and $T_m$, giving PET excellent thermal stability
• Polar ester groups enable hydrogen bonding with water but also create strong interchain attractions that enhance barrier properties against $\text{CO}_2$ and $\text{O}_2$
• Strain-induced crystallization during bottle blowing dramatically improves mechanical strength—this processing-structure relationship is highly testable

---

Polar Interactions and Hydrogen Bonding

Polymers with electronegative atoms in their structure exhibit stronger intermolecular forces, raising thermal transitions and often improving toughness. Hydrogen bonding capability dramatically affects moisture sensitivity and mechanical properties.

Nylon (Polyamide)

• Amide linkages $\text{—CO—NH—}$ enable extensive interchain hydrogen bonding, creating high crystallinity and exceptional tensile strength
• Moisture absorption (up to 8-10% by weight) occurs because water molecules compete for hydrogen bonding sites—this plasticizes the polymer and reduces $T_g$
• Excellent abrasion resistance results from the combination of crystallinity and strong secondary forces, making nylon ideal for gears and fibers

Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC)

• Chlorine substituents create dipole-dipole interactions that raise $T_g$ to $\sim$80°C—rigid PVC results when no plasticizers are added
• Plasticizer addition (typically phthalates) disrupts chain packing and lowers $T_g$, transforming rigid pipe material into flexible tubing
• Thermal degradation releases HCl gas through dehydrochlorination—stabilizers are essential during processing, a common exam topic

Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA)

• Bulky ester side groups restrict chain mobility and create a high $T_g$ ($\sim$105°C), keeping PMMA glassy at room temperature
• Excellent optical clarity (92% light transmission) results from its amorphous structure—no crystalline regions to scatter light
• Polar ester groups provide better adhesion and paintability than nonpolar alternatives like PS

---

Impact Resistance and Toughness

Some applications demand polymers that absorb energy without fracturing. Rubber-modified phases, flexible backbone segments, or inherently tough molecular structures provide impact resistance.

Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS)

• Two-phase morphology—rubbery polybutadiene domains dispersed in rigid SAN (styrene-acrylonitrile) matrix create an energy-absorbing microstructure
• Impact resistance comes from rubber particles that initiate controlled crazing and cavitation, dissipating fracture energy
• Balance of properties (stiffness from styrene, toughness from butadiene, chemical resistance from acrylonitrile) makes ABS a workhorse engineering plastic

Polycarbonate (PC)

• Carbonate linkages and bisphenol A units create a stiff backbone with enough segmental mobility to undergo ductile yielding rather than brittle fracture
• Exceptional impact strength (250× greater than glass) combined with optical clarity makes PC essential for safety glazing and eyewear
• High $T_g$ ($\sim$150°C) allows use in demanding thermal environments, though PC is susceptible to stress cracking in certain solvents

Polystyrene (PS)

• Bulky phenyl rings create a high $T_g$ ($\sim$100°C) but also restrict chain mobility, resulting in brittle fracture under impact
• Low cost and easy processability make PS economical for disposable applications despite its mechanical limitations
• Expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam exploits low thermal conductivity for insulation—the cellular structure, not the polymer itself, provides the property

---

Special Performance Properties

Certain thermoplastics exhibit unique characteristics—extreme chemical resistance, optical properties, or surface behavior—that place them in specialized niches. These often result from unusual backbone chemistry or fluorine substitution.

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)

• Complete fluorine substitution creates the lowest surface energy of any solid polymer—nothing sticks because intermolecular attractions with other materials are negligible
• Exceptional chemical resistance (inert to virtually all chemicals except molten alkali metals) results from the strength of $\text{C—F}$ bonds ($\sim$485 kJ/mol)
• High melting point ($\sim$327°C) but cannot be melt-processed conventionally due to extremely high melt viscosity—requires sintering techniques

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Both PE and PP have nonpolar hydrocarbon backbones, yet PP has a higher melting point. What structural feature explains this difference, and how does it affect chain packing?

2. Which two polymers from this guide rely on hydrogen bonding for their mechanical properties, and how does this make them respond differently to moisture exposure?

3. Compare ABS and PS: what specific structural modification transforms brittle polystyrene into a tough engineering plastic, and what mechanism provides the energy absorption?

4. An FRQ asks you to select a polymer for outdoor safety glazing that must be transparent, impact-resistant, and thermally stable. Which polymer would you choose, and what three structural features justify your selection?

5. PTFE and PE are both nonpolar polymers, yet PTFE has far superior chemical and thermal resistance. Explain this difference in terms of bond energies and atomic properties, then identify why PTFE is more difficult to process than PE.