Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
In chemical engineering, process control isn't just about keeping numbers in range—it's about understanding why certain variables behave the way they do and how they interact to determine reaction outcomes, product quality, and plant safety. You're being tested on your ability to identify which variables to manipulate, which to monitor, and how changes in one affect the others. This systems-thinking approach separates engineers who can troubleshoot real problems from those who just memorize setpoints.
The variables covered here fall into distinct categories: thermodynamic drivers like temperature and pressure that govern reaction feasibility, transport variables like flow rate and viscosity that control material movement, and composition indicators that tell you what's actually happening chemically. Don't just memorize definitions—know what each variable controls, what controls it, and how it connects to mass balances, energy balances, and reaction kinetics.
These variables establish the fundamental conditions under which reactions occur. Temperature and pressure define the thermodynamic landscape—they determine whether a reaction is even possible and how far it can proceed toward equilibrium.
Compare: Temperature vs. Pressure—both shift equilibrium positions, but temperature changes itself while pressure only shifts composition at constant . FRQs often ask you to predict which variable to manipulate for a given reaction optimization.
These variables govern how materials move through your process. Mass transfer, heat transfer, and residence time all depend on getting the right amount of material to the right place at the right speed.
Compare: Flow rate vs. Viscosity—both affect how material moves, but flow rate is a controlled variable you set, while viscosity is a property you must accommodate. High-viscosity fluids at low flow rates create residence time challenges that compound.
Level control maintains material balances and prevents dangerous operating conditions. This is where your experiment-scale intuition meets industrial-scale consequences.
Compare: Level vs. Flow Rate—level is an inventory variable (how much you have) while flow rate is a throughput variable (how fast it moves). Control systems often manipulate flow rate to maintain level setpoints.
These variables tell you what you have, not just how much. Composition monitoring closes the loop between process conditions and product specifications.
Compare: Composition vs. Concentration—composition is a ratio (mole fractions sum to 1), while concentration is an absolute amount (moles per volume). You can change concentration without changing composition by dilution or compression.
Some variables aren't measured directly but are calculated from other measurements or inferred from process conditions. These connect your measurable inputs to your desired outputs.
Compare: Reaction rate vs. Flow rate—reaction rate describes chemical transformation speed while flow rate describes physical movement speed. Matching these in continuous reactors determines steady-state conversion.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Thermodynamic equilibrium | Temperature, Pressure |
| Reaction kinetics | Temperature, Concentration, Reaction rate |
| Material transport | Flow rate, Viscosity, Density |
| Inventory management | Level, Flow rate |
| Product quality | Composition, Concentration, pH |
| Safety-critical control | Temperature, Pressure, Level |
| Equipment design drivers | Pressure, Density, Viscosity |
| Biological processes | pH, Temperature, Concentration |
Which two variables both affect equilibrium position but through different thermodynamic mechanisms? Explain how their effects differ mathematically.
A reactor is producing lower conversion than expected. Which variables would you check first, and in what order? Justify your troubleshooting sequence.
Compare and contrast how concentration and composition are used in reaction engineering—when would you report each, and why might one change while the other stays constant?
An FRQ describes a continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) with residence time issues. Which variables determine residence time, and how would you manipulate them to increase conversion?
Why is level considered a safety-critical variable even though it doesn't directly affect reaction chemistry? Connect your answer to both upstream and downstream process implications.